Volkswagen-Suzuki Row: Bloomberg Lost In Translation

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

Yesterday, Bloomberg poured gasoline into the smoldering embers that used to be a Volkswagen-Suzuki relationship. Bloomberg said that Suzuki doesn’t want to talk to Volkswagen. The trouble is: Bloomberg most likely is wrong. Bloomberg and the world at large became a victim of Lost in Translation.

It is no secret that the bloom is off the rose between Suzuki and Volkswagen. Nothing new had transpired about the strained relationship ever since Osamu Suzuki himself turned into a blogger and said that he was “somewhat uncomfortable with the statement” that Volkswagen can influence corporate policy at Suzuki. Osamu Suzuki stressed that “the two companies agreed to remain independent partners on an equal footing when we signed the partnership in the first place.”

A little later, Hans Demant, now at Volkswagen responsible for strategic alliances and partnerships, tried to calm the waters: “Volkswagen and Suzuki are and remain independent,” Demant told Manager Magazin. After that it became quiet – until yesterday.

Yesterday, Bloomberg had a piece out that was mainly warmed-over material from the archives, except for one explosive sentence:

“Volkswagen is not talking to us,” Osamu Suzuki, the Hamamatsu City, Japan-based company’s chairman, said in an interview. “We have no plans to talk to them.”

Suzuki and Volkswagen no longer on taking terms? That’s BIG! The wire piece raced around the world and was eagerly picked up, from Automotive News [sub] to World News. The trouble is: It is most likely bunk. No official confirmation can be obtained. However, amongst the tight-knit gaggle of Tokyo auto business beat reporters, the following version is making the rounds:

The interview is so short because Bloomberg waylaid Osamu Suzuki in Hamamatsu. They were brushed off with one sentence. Which then was mangled in the Japanese to English translation. This according to a source familiar with the rumor.

Instead of “Volkswagen is not talking to us. We have no plans to talk to them,” Osamu Suzuki allegedly mumbled “How can we comment when VW hasn’t said anything to us?”

Off he was. End of interview. Now that would change things a lot, wouldn’t you say?

Of course, if Bloomberg provides a video where Osamu Suzuki says “Volkswagen wa watashi tachi ni hanasanai. Watashi tachi no karera to hanasu yotei wa nai” (or Japanese words to that effect) and not “Dono you ni watashi tachi wa. Volkswagen ni tai shite comment sure ba yoi no daroka” (or Japanese words to that effect), then we take it all back and provide the requisite 90 degree bow. In front of running cameras.


Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 4 comments
  • -Cole- -Cole- on Sep 07, 2011

    Who But Bertel, would provide this correction.

  • I_godzuki I_godzuki on Sep 08, 2011

    Given it's a rumor, maybe someone should ask the Bloomberg reporters who wrote the story for more detail. Suzuki or whoever it is may have a good reason to say it's a mistranslation if Osamu has spoken out of turn. Also, they have their email addresses at the bottom of the story, so it's not like they're hard to find.

  • Dave Holzman My '08 Civic (stick, 159k on the clock) is my favorite car that I've ever owned. If I had to choose between the current Civic and Corolla, I'd test drive 'em (with stick), and see how they felt. But I'd be approaching this choice partial to the Civic. I would not want any sort of automatic transmission, or the turbo engine.
  • Merc190 I would say Civic Si all the way if it still revved to 8300 rpm with no turbo. But nowadays I would pick the Corolla because I think they have a more clear idea on their respective models identity and mission. I also believe Toyota has a higher standard for quality.
  • Dave Holzman I think we're mixing up a few things here. I won't swear to it, but I'd be damned surprised if they were putting fire retardant in the seats of any cars from the '50s, or even the '60s. I can't quite conjure up the new car smell of the '57 Chevy my parents bought on October 17th of that year... but I could do so--vividly--until the last five years or so. I loved that scent, and when I smelled it, I could see the snow on Hollis Street in Cambridge Mass, as one or the other parent got ready to drive me to nursery school, and I could remember staring up at the sky on Christmas Eve, 1957, wondering if I might see Santa Claus flying overhead in his sleigh. No, I don't think the fire retardant on the foam in the seats of 21st (and maybe late 20th) century cars has anything to do with new car smell. (That doesn't mean new car small lacked toxicity--it probably had some.)
  • ToolGuy Is this a website or a podcast with homework? You want me to answer the QOTD before I listen to the podcast? Last time I worked on one of our vehicles (2010 RAV4 2.5L L4) was this past week -- replaced the right front passenger window regulator (only problem turned out to be two loose screws, but went ahead and installed the new part), replaced a bulb in the dash, finally ordered new upper dash finishers (non-OEM) because I cracked one of them ~2 years ago.Looked at the mileage (157K) and scratched my head and proactively ordered plugs, coils, PCV valve, air filter and a spare oil filter, plus a new oil filter housing (for the weirdo cartridge-type filter). Those might go in tomorrow. Is this interesting to you? It ain't that interesting to me. 😉The more intriguing part to me, is I have noticed some 'blowby' (but is it) when the oil filler cap is removed which I don't think was there before. But of course I'm old and forgetful. Is it worth doing a compression test? Leakdown test? Perhaps if a guy were already replacing the plugs...
  • Crown No surprise there. The toxic chemical stew of outgassing.
Next