California Legislature Considers Limiting DUI Roadblock Use

The Newspaper
by The Newspaper

Confiscating automobiles has become a significant source of revenue for cash-strapped California cities. Last Tuesday, the state legislature gave preliminary approval to legislation to impose limits on the practice.

Under current law, municipalities run sobriety checkpoints funded almost entirely by $30 million in federal grant money. The drunk-driving (DUI) roadblocks catch comparatively few drunk drivers, so officers often focus on issuing as many tickets as possible for minor violations while cars are stopped. Assembly Bill 353 separates vehicle inspection checkpoints from DUI roadblocks and prohibits impounding of vehicles unless the alleged offense meets certain criteria.


Cars will be impounded from anyone suspected of driving while drunk or on a suspended license, unless the driver or a police officer can safely park the vehicle until a properly licensed driver can take it away. Some lawmakers see racial motivation behind current practice.

“Despite their original intent, sobriety checkpoints are increasingly being used to target drivers that are ineligible to obtain licenses in order to increase local revenue,” the bill’s sponsor, Assemblyman Gil Cedillo (D-Los Angeles), explained. “Frequently these checkpoints are set up in the areas that do not have a high correlation of DUI arrests or accidents; instead, they are placed in neighborhoods and, or locations where there are higher populations of low-income families and communities.”

Cedillo cited the Investigative Reporting Program at the University of California, Berkeley which calculated that at 3200 roadblocks in the past two years, 61 percent took place in locations with a heavy Hispanic population.

“While impoundments for DUIs are usually overnight, impoundment for driving without a license typically last for a term of 30 days,” Cedillo said. “Often, this effectively results in the forfeiture of the vehicle because the towing and impoundment fees may well exceed the value of the vehicle, which is apart from the fines already paid to local governments.”

Municipalities collect $150 from license fines imposed at roadblocks plus receive hundreds of thousands of dollars in fees from towing companies. Out of 24,000 vehicle impounds at DUI roadblocks in 2009, a mere 13 percent were related to drunk driving.

A copy of the legislation is available in a 160k PDF file at the source link below.

Source: Assembly Bill 353 (California State Legislature, 8/16/2011)

[Courtesy: Thenewspaper.com]

The Newspaper
The Newspaper

More by The Newspaper

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 17 comments
  • Jkross22 Jkross22 on Aug 23, 2011

    Consider the source. For those who don't live in CA, just Google "One Bill Gil" Cedillo's name and you'll see where this is coming from. If the man was white, he'd be wearing a KKK hat. Even though he allegedly represents a wide swath of Angelenos, he cares only for those whose skin color matches his. He represents the worst of the worst of us.

    • See 1 previous
    • Cfclark Cfclark on Aug 23, 2011

      You beat me to the "One Bill Gil" comment...so I guess this is his second bill. For the poster who asked, he is indeed a kindred spirit to Maxine Waters. DUI checkpoints are well-publicized in California (by law, I guess? I'm a fairly recent transplant), so anyone heading out for a drive on a busy weekend night should avail himself/herself of their location, so as to plan an alternate route. (If you run into one, you may well have forgotten because you are drunk.)

  • Mikey Mikey on Aug 23, 2011

    Here In Ontario it called "Reduce Impaired Driving Everywhere" or R.I.D.E.. They check for seat belts,drunks,dopers, unsafe cars. If you arn't drunk,stoned, unbelted or driving a beater, the Cops don't even ask for I.D. I don't 100 percent agree with the RIDE program. I personally believe that it puts a strain,on the already strained Police. However I don't care, my car is safe and I'm not drunk. A few years ago, after a string of rapes and murders, the cops set up a phony RIDE check. They were not looking for drunks. What they were looking for was a grey SUV with a particular tread pattern. So they stop an Airforce Colonel driving a grey Pathfinder. A Candian air force base comander,no less. The guy used to fly the Prime Minister around. He pleaded guilty to multiple rapes, and two murders. Declared "a dangerous offender" he will never be released. If hadn't of been stopped,who knows how many more he would have killed. So maybe RIDE programs do work.

  • CFS I can’t believe these comments aren’t 100% in favor of CarPlay/Android Auto. They don’t add much for music and other audio that you don’t get with just a Bluetooth connection, but they make navigation so so much better. Why is it better? Because inputting the destination address is so much easier. And I don’t need to think about updating my car’s maps. Plus, I can switch between Google Maps, Waze, Apple Maps, or whatever else seems best suited for my trip. Hands-free calling features are OK, but not such a big deal for me.
  • TheEndlessEnigma I've owned a VW in the past and learned my lesson. Any kind of repair was absurdly expensive which I understand is typical of VW nowadays.
  • TheEndlessEnigma Interesting how Stellantis (and can we take a moment to acknowledge how piss-poor a company name this is - it invokes....what....MBA marketeers failing at their job) is pursuing cuts to reduce costs instead of, oh I don't know, designing-building-marketing vehicles people *WANT* to buy? What has Stella done with what was Chrysler? Suck off the cash flow generated by Chrysler brands, essentially kill the Chrysler brand by cancelling successful models, eliminate any market advantage Dodge had by killing successful models (G Caravan was the #1 minivan until it was killed, Charger & Challenger *were* profitable, etc,) and progressively and continually neuter Jeep all this while ignoring component and build quality. What's done in return? Push Fiat as the new and exciting brand then watch as it fails in North America (did you know ONLY 603 Fiats were sold in the US in 2023). All new Stellantis releases in North America are Euro designs......that then fail in North America because they are not design for our market. The Stellanis solution? Fire Fred, Hank, and Jim and replace them with Apu, Jose and Bernardo. Yup, that will work.
  • 3-On-The-Tree To say your people are total monsters is an unfair statement. You can judge the Japanese government but to say the citizens are culpable or responsible is wrong. That’s like saying every Caucasian person in the U.S is responsible for slavery or the civil rights era of violence and discrimination against African Americans and are benefiting from it. That’s 79 years ago, the average Japanese citizen born during WWII has nothing to do with what happened. Even my Japanese grandmother who was living in Yokohama whose home was firebombed was just trying to survive with 3 kids and a husband fighting in the war. Just like every war the citizens suffer, I saw it in Iraq. You can’t judge the people from the misdeeds of their government, my mom was born after the war, you really think she is responsible for what happened?
  • Irvingklaws Was a must have for my wife's new car. After years of windshield mounts, trying to keep the sun off the phone, wires running across the dash, etc...it's been a welcome upgrade. Don't have it in my current (old) car, just a stock stereo with the aforementioned windshield phone mount and wires...which is fine enough for me. But if I upgrade the radio with an aftermarket unit, the first thing I'm looking for, after separate volume and tuning KNOBS, is Carplay. Note, I've yet to find an aftermarket head unit meeting these basic qualifications. The infotainment in my '17 GTI had both of these and was near perfect, I'd be happy with that unit in any car.
Next