Wikidiarrhea: How The Rooskies Blew The Opel Deal

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt
wikidiarrhea how the rooskies blew the opel deal

Good morning! Two years after GM reneged on the Opel sale to Magna and Sperbank, the Times of London has the big scoop. GM cancelled the sale of Opel because the buyers wanted the right to sell its factories to a Russian state-owned car maker, says the Times, citing U.S. diplomatic cables revealed in Wikileaks. Really? You don’t say! We are shocked!

Now if The Times would have read the highly confidential TTAC, it would have known two years ago that Russia’s GAZ was in on the Magna-Sperbank deal from day one. A little further reading would have revealed that GM had no problems with GAZ right after the deal collapsed and wanted to “pick up with Magna and GAZ and continue to try to develop this business –but obviously now as part of a GM-retained Opel, not as part of a Magna-Sberbank consortium,” as then GM Group Vice President John Smith said two years ago. Even more reading would have revealed that the same GAZ has “signed an agreement for the contract assembly of the new Chevrolet Aveo small car at GAZ’s facility in Nizhniy Novgorod, Russia” in February. Which caused us to write:

“Remember Oleg Deripaska? The Russian oligarch that had been under suspicion of money laundering and organized crime activities? The very same Deripaska GM did not want to have close to Opel for fear of losing their precious intellectual property ? Yes, him. GM just handed him the blueprints and the tooling for the Chevy Aveo.”

I don’t know who’s more asleep at the wheel, the Times of London, Wikileaks, or the U.S. Embassy in Berlin that dispatched the cable to Foggy Bottom.

Comments
Join the conversation
 3 comments
  • Friedclams Friedclams on Jul 25, 2011

    Handing someone the tooling for the Aveo might be considered an act of war against the giftee... maybe GM is still fighting the Reds.

    • Dadude53 Dadude53 on Jul 25, 2011

      +1. GAZ also had the vehicle blueprints and some of the plant production tooling on the old Sebring.Just drove them deeper into the hole.

  • Siuol11.2 Siuol11.2 on Jul 26, 2011

    I want to know where that original image came from. It looks like a slightly racy Hardy Boys novel.

  • Skippity “Things To Watch Out For When Buying a 1979 Mercury Cougar XR-7.” A 1979 Mercury Cougar XR-7.
  • Mike Beranek Would you cross this man? No way!
  • Skippity I kinda like styling. There’s plenty of lookalike boxes on the road. Nice to see something unique.
  • Make_light I drive a 2015 A4 and had one of these as a loaner once. It was a huge disappointment (and I would have considered purchasing one as my next car--I'm something of a small crossover apologist). The engine sounded insanely coarse and unrefined (to the point that I wasn't sure if it was poor insulation or there was something wrong with my loaner). The seats, interior materials, and NVH were a huge downgrade compared to my dated A4. I get that they are a completely different class of car, but the contrast struck me. The Q3 just didn't feel like a luxury vehicle at all. Friends of mine drive a Tiguan and I can't think of one way in which the Q3 feels worth the extra cost. My mom's CX-5 is better than either in every conceivable way.
  • Arthur Dailey Personally I prefer a 1970s velour interior to the leather interior. And also prefer the instrument panel and steering wheel introduced later in the Mark series to the ones in the photograph. I have never seen a Mark III or IV with a 'centre console'. Was that even an option for the Mark IV? Rather than bucket seats they had the exceptional and sorely missed 60/40 front seating. The most comfortable seats of all for a man of a 'certain size'. In retrospect this may mark the point when Cadillac lost it mojo. Through the early to mid/late 70's Lincoln surpassed Cadillac in 'prestige/pride of place'. Then the 'imports' took over in the 1980s with the rise of the 'yuppies'.
Next