At Home With The Toyodas - And A Mysterious Cherry Tree

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

Today, I went on a very early morning Shinkansen to Nagoya. The idea was to have me kind of certified as a Toyota-accredited journalist. I don’t know whether I qualified. I flunked the required rattling-off of the 12 Toyota plants in Japan. However, I was invited into Toyoda’s house.

Not Akio Toyoda’s house. His grandfather Kiichiro Toyoda’s house. He was the founder of Toyota. The house was built in 1933, and as you can see, the house would be just as much at home up the Hudson or in Georgetown as it is in the green hills near Toyota City.

What was interesting is what I found in the somehow unruly weeds next to the house: A little cherry tree. What makes a little cherry tree in Japan so interesting? A little sign. It says in Japanese and English: “Commemorating Toyota’s New Start.” And then a date: “2011-2-24.”

What happened on February 24, 2011? Not much. But what happened a year before? That’s right: Akio Toyoda took to The Hill and was grilled by Congress. A little bit less than a year later, on February 8, 2011, Toyota was formally exonerated. Nobody apologized. There wasn’t even a “thank you” for the three times $16.4 million the NHTSA had collected from Toyota.

It is fascinating that the congressional barbecue is remembered as a new start somewhere in the woods near Toyota City.



Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 49 comments
  • Jkk6 Jkk6 on Jul 06, 2011

    Cannot wait to ses how that tree get's cut down. Real grudges go down generations in East-Asian society.

  • Robert.Walter Robert.Walter on Jul 06, 2011

    Thanks for the amplifications Bertel. (I did also find somebody's comment about the english-subtitled tablet under the tree instructive and enlightening ... which aligns well with the adage: "with a message, always consider your audience" ... and wondered if the real message is "the only way to go forward, is by going back and honoring that which served us so well for so long...") I got to thinking about the whole "companies often fail in the 2nd or 3rd generation (because the values of the founder fail to become a transending theme because they fail to be imbued into his descendents, or the values themselves are not adaptable to change) thing. Was thinking about Krupp: - the family kept the little cabin of the founder in the Werksgelände, long after the earlier descendents had built Villa Hugel, or were sodomizing their boy toys on Capri, or the last descendent flying around in his Jet-Star and living a decadent lifestyle on Sylt and Rio (as the business, the family tradition, the legacy his father built-up for him; in short, his birth-right cratered into bankruptcy, restructuring, care-taker ownership, and a kind of GM-like rudderless existance... Then thought of Thyssen: - the old man found his success much quicker, restored a castle, rubbed elbows with Adenauer (German Chancellor), but in the end, the family devolved into a bunch of unhappy, squabbling, drunk collectors of often-derided, oftentimes minor, artwork. Or Carnegie (US-Steel), or the New York Central System (the pride of the Vanderbilts), or newer technologies that came after steel, connected with names like Westinghouse, Edison, or Bell, or that came after cars (like Douglas, McDonnel, Grumman, Northrup, Hughes, Lougheed, Wright, Curtiss, etc., or Galvin Mfg.) And all of the car companies, even with a much shorter time-span between the founder, the descendents who sold-out or were taken-over, and in the process whos founding families and principles have been washed out to sea over time... And it occurred to me, that Toyota is really very unusual, in that it is probably the most stable (from a DNA perspective) of all the companies with a family member somewhere in the management (like Ford, Peugeot, or holding shares like BMW or re-agglomerated like VW ) ... But, I am still wondering how Kiichiro-san's descendents are living today, do they have the little house on the hill sensibility, or have they also moved-on to the often G5-flying, mega-yacht sailing, sometimes scandal-sheet-sizzling-affair lifestyles of many of their competitor companies founding families? p.s. House looks like a japanese-interpretation of a swiss-style cottage... here's an austrian-interpretation of the swiss-cottage motif: http://www.feldkirch.at/stadt/bildergalerie/11.-mai-2011-besichtigung-der-parkanlage-margarethenkapf/img_5639.jpg

  • Ravenuer Not into F1. Started watching NASCAR back when they raced actual cars. (yeah I'm that old). Not any more. They aren't "stock cars" now. Not even close. Even drag races don't interest me anymore. Races are over in 3 seconds.
  • Wjtinfwb No confusion on my end, Ghost. The Government has zero role in job creation outside of the legitimate opportunities' created by Government going about it's responsibilities, namely keeping the American people and territory safe from foreign intrusion. Of course, they're failing epically at that but that's a different topic. The American free enterprise system is what enables job creation. Government's role is to stay out of the way of that system, but they seem incapable of doing so. Oil & Gas exploration is just one example. If a National Job Policy is what you're looking for, there are other countries that will be happy to accept your application for residency.
  • Michael Smith I drive 100-300 miles a day in new BMWs, Mercedes-Benzes, and GM SUVs. Some are already equipped with automatic braking.It's the first thing I turn off when I start the car.I've had experiences where (as the author notes) the system gave false alarms and stabbed the brake pedal, threatening my ability to control the car.Further, every driver encounters situations where, for example, legal following distance must be momentarily compromised in order to avoid a difficult situation. When the system intervenes, it disrupts the driver's plan of action. This can lead to a collision as the driver has to suddenly react not to his surroundings, but to the system.Not only is automatic braking an insult to skilled drivers, it's dangerous to everyone.
  • Dave M. My hipster daughter is greatly into it. We watched the race together this weekend. It was interesting but I'm not devoted to it like she is. She'll be at the Austin race in October.
  • Bd2 I'll watch F1 when Kia and/or Hyundai pony (pun intended) up the cash to field a class leading team. Hyundai is leading many series with the Elantra N with it's incredible 350HP Smartstream-R engine.
Next