Piston Slap: Dusting Off Love for a Swedish Meatball

Sajeev Mehta
by Sajeev Mehta

James writes:

Hey Sajeev, James here (well duh.) I’m at a conundrum of logic-versus-emotion and I need someone to talk me out of this idea. My current car is an ’07 Accord EX sedan, 4-cylinder, 5-speed, low miles (like 42k, hardly broken in.) It’s a great car – costs almost nothing to maintain,comfortable, great shifter, good gas mileage. The only thing is, I don’t actually… well… like it.

I’ve always had a thing for turbocharged Swedish cars (oh lord.) My last car was a beautiful Saab 900 SPG that blew up in dramatic fashion despite me throwing a frankly insane amount of money at it while I owned it. Thus the appliance-like Honda now.

However, I’ve always had an attraction to Volvo T-5 powered cars, in particular the 850 and S70/V70 (first-generation). My first car was a non-turbo 850 auto sedan, and I always said I’d have kept it if it had a clutch pedal or a turbo motor. I seem to have come across the perfect T-5 and I’m considering selling the Honda, buying the T5, and investing the rest of the money somewhere more useful (than a depreciating asset I don’t like all that much.)

The car’s a ’98 V70 T-5 wagon with a (rather rare) 5-speed transmission. Just got a new timing belt, tensioners, and rollers like a month ago. It’s totally stock except for a set of 17″ V70R wheels, it’s got just over 100k miles on it, and from the pictures it looks immaculate. I know the weak spots on these cars (mainly the rear main seal, clutches, ABS pumps) but this one has records since new and has been Volvo-nut maintained. It’s also worth about 5k less than my Honda, which would be a useful chunk of savings for me since I’m pretty young. So from my optimistic standpoint it seems win-win – get a car I’ve always wanted that seems perfect, and save money on insurance, while putting away some money in savings. But maybe I’m just creating my own logic to justify buying a 14 year old European turbo wagon. What say you?

Sajeev answers:

I think you’d be almost as happy upgrading the dampers, wheels/tires, swaybars on your Accord, with a better (value) car in the end. But hey, what the heart wants, the heart sometimes gets: those older turbo Volvos are quirky, cool and fairly reasonable to wrench on. So let’s give it a chance, and pull in TTAC’s own Swedish Surgeon, Alex Dykes.

Alex Dykes answers:

James, you managed to pick one of the best years for the V70 T5. The only thing better than a 1998 T5 wagon with the 5-speed manual is a 2000 V70R with the 5-speed manual grafted to it. As you have probably researched, the 1999 and 2000 V70s had a problematic drive-by-wire throttle. By sticking with ’98 models you can keep the maintenance cheap and cheerful. The major S70/V70 quibbles tend to be the ABS controller which can be repaired rather than replaced, the soft OEM upper engine mount wears rapidly, the door trim panels “bubble” due to some questionable adhesives being used and the T5 can chew through caps and rotors in as little as 15,000 miles.

Compared to your ’07 Accord, I’d probably take the cheap Swedish hauler if you like some wrenching. The S70/V70 is incredibly easy to work on, the 5-cylinder is a funky engine that quickly earns your love, torque steer be damned! And FWD wheel hop is pretty fun in the T5, which it will do aplenty while laying down some rubber.

Since you say it has about 100,000 miles on it, be sure the previous owner has changed the timing belt AND the tensioner. The ’98 models used a hydraulic tensioner that must be changed at 70,000 miles. Since Volvo’s T5 is an interference engine, broken timing belts are the only thing that stands in your way of many carefree miles. IPD sells belts and all the tools you need to make the change. Be sure the climate control works properly before you buy, flashing lights mean the blend doors are sticking. If the door panels show any signs of the pleater “bubbling” then know that the only solution is new door panels from Volvo at a couple hundred a pop (ask me how I know). My 1998 S70 T5 is still running, now on it’s third owner (friend of mine) and has just crested 280,000 miles with it’s original engine, turbo, and transmission. The clutch finally gave out around 250,000 miles. If the V has been well treated, then it’s only barely broken in. Buy it, get your self a set of Torx sockets and burn some front wheel rubber.

Send your queries to mehta@ttac.com. Spare no details and ask for a speedy resolution if you’re in a hurry.

Sajeev Mehta
Sajeev Mehta

More by Sajeev Mehta

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 20 comments
  • Diseasel Diseasel on Apr 19, 2011

    James's story sounds really familiar, and I get the feeling that I read it somewhere on the interwebs within the last six months or so. Was it here at TTAC?

  • Durailer Durailer on Apr 19, 2011

    Get the Volvo, when it turns into a money pit (which could be many miles from now), your heart may long for another quirky and less troublesome drive. My '99 S70 base had 200k miles on it, still drove like new, anyone that's taken a look underneath the car complimented me that it still looked factory new. My only complaint was the need to top up oil mid-cycle, and that the A/C compressor clutch would overheat and disengage. I wish I didn't have to give it up but my girlfriend wanted to drive a much newer car. So I say... follow your heart!

  • El scotto They should be supping with a very, very long spoon.
  • El scotto [list=1][*]Please make an EV that's not butt-ugly. Not Jaguar gorgeous but Buick handsome will do.[/*][*] For all the golf cart dudes: A Tesla S in Plaid mode will be the fastest ride you'll ever take.[/*][*]We have actual EV owners posting on here. Just calmly stated facts and real world experience. This always seems to bring out those who would argue math.[/*][/list=1]For some people an EV will never do, too far out in the country, taking trips where an EV will need recharged, etc. If you own a home and can charge overnight an EV makes perfect sense. You're refueling while you're sleeping.My condo association is allowing owners to install chargers. You have to pay all of the owners of the parking spaces the new electric service will cross. Suggested fee is 100$ and the one getting a charger pays all the legal and filing fees. I held out for a bottle of 30 year old single malt.Perhaps high end apartments will feature reserved parking spaces with chargers in the future. Until then non home owners are relying on public charge and one of my neighbors is in IT and he charges at work. It's call a perk.I don't see company owned delivery vehicles that are EV's. The USPS and the smiley boxes should be the 1st to do this. Nor are any of our mega car dealerships doing this and but of course advertising this fact.I think a great many of the EV haters haven't came to the self-actualization that no one really cares what you drive. I can respect and appreciate what you drive but if I was pushed to answer, no I really don't care what you drive. Before everyone goes into umbrage over my last sentence, I still like cars. Especially yours.I have heated tiles in my bathroom and my kitchen. The two places you're most likely to be barefoot. An EV may fall into to the one less thing to mess with for many people.Macallan for those who were wondering.
  • EBFlex The way things look in the next 5-10 years no. There are no breakthroughs in battery technology coming, the charging infrastructure is essentially nonexistent, and the price of entry is still way too high.As soon as an EV can meet the bar set by ICE in range, refueling times, and price it will take off.
  • Jalop1991 Way to bury the lead. "Toyota to offer two EVs in the states"!
  • Jalop1991 I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that.
Next