Chart Of The Day: Does The EcoBoost F-150 "Fail" At Fuel Economy?

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

Bringing out a V6 version of a full-size truck like the F-150 is a good way to get truck guys suspicious, especially if you try to assuage their fears by talking about the engine’s direct-injection, turbocharging and other high-tech frippery. Ford’s solution: emphasize the “power of a V8, efficiency of a V6” simplification, and hope the market catches on as gas prices rise. But does Ford’s marketing concept actually hold true in real life? Does an Ecoboost F-150 get the mileage of a six cylinder even when doing tough truck-guy work? Thanks to some great work by Pickuptrucks.com, you can decide for yourself using the data from a fantastic infographic used to illustrate their test of a loaded and unloaded Ecoboost F-150.

As the chart portion above shows, the Ecoboost’s solid unloaded mileage (the green line) takes a serious beating when it has to haul a 9,000-lb trailer (the blue line), a fact that’s hardly surprising in itself. Because the test didn’t include non-Ecoboost trucks, Pickuptrucks.com’s results don’t tell us conclusively whether Ford’s 5.0 V8 would return comparable mileage hauling the same load, but the Ecoboost’s disappointing loaded mileage was cause for at least one major car blog to deem it a “failure.” That seems harsh, as even if the V8 does match the Ecoboost’s towing efficiency, the V6 should still offer considerably better mileage under nearly all other conditions. Besides, most people buy trucks in order to have towing capability, not because they need to tow on a daily basis… for those buyers, the Ecoboost’s improved non-towing mileage would be welcome, even if towing itself isn’t especially efficient.

Still, Ford’s made something of a gamble by bringing a turbocharged V6 into the world of full-sized trucks, and yet another by marketing it as a considerably more efficient replacement for a V8. And ultimately, whether the Ecoboost V6 makes a worthwhile truck engine is something that each truck buyer will have to decide for themselves. Luckily, even if you think the Ecoboost isn’t worth its downsides, at least Ford gives you plenty of options.


Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 46 comments
  • Mikemannn Mikemannn on Apr 19, 2011

    I can't wait for the followup where they test and prove the *gasp* the 30MPG Ford Mustang V6 gets much worse mileage around the Streets of Willow when driven at 10/10ths.

  • Benzaholic Benzaholic on Apr 20, 2011

    "efficiency of a V6" Hmm. You mean they're selling a V6 and claiming it has the efficiency of a V6? I just don't believe them. How can that possibly be true?

  • Analoggrotto Another brilliant decision from a company known for making brilliant decisions. In 5 years or less we will be reading about how they plan to fully refurbish the building (thanks tax payers) and move right back in. Hyundai should buy this building and use it as a Nexus of Affluence.
  • SCE to AUX Hmm, must be part of Detroit's ongoing renewal.
  • SCE to AUX Polls about electric cars are worthless, but the media loves them."35 percent saying they might consider one"... Ridiculously untrue, unless that fraction meant 'might' = 50% and 'consider' = 20%, so you get a more realistic 10%.Likewise, the variance in unreliable polls only makes things worse, so comparing this year's bad poll to last year's bad poll is just dumb.
  • Ras815 "Showroom quality"? Which showroom would that be - a rural small-town used car lot?
  • TheMrFreeze Whenever I see "Junior" used like this, in my mind I hear Sean Connery calling Harrison Ford "Junior" in "Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade"
Next