By on February 11, 2011

The South Dakota House of Representatives voted 43 to 24 on Tuesday to prohibit the use of red light cameras and speed cameras in the state. A bipartisan group of lawmakers led by state Representative Peggy Gibson (D-Huron) took aim at the controversial automated ticketing machine set up in Sioux Falls, describing the due process denied innocent motorists ticketed by the system.

“My constituent not only did not own the car that was photographed, but she was not even in Sioux Falls at the time,” Gibson said Tuesday. “In other words, she was presumed guilty of a traffic violation she did not commit in a car she did not own, but she had to go to great lengths to prove her innocence.”

Sioux Falls hired the Australian contractor Redflex Traffic Systems to set up the cameras without legislative authorization. A lower court judge has already ruled the system violates state law (view decision). To address the issue, the House-passed legislation provides a straight-up ban on “photo radar speed detection” and use of a “photo monitoring device to detect any red light violation” by any “state, county, municipal or township authority.” At the request of the state attorney general, an amendment was added to clarify that dashcams may still be used by law enforcement. That did not satisfy a handful of members who defended automated ticketing.

“This situation right here is a matter that should be addressed to the Sioux Falls city council,” state Representative Stace Nelson (R-Fulton) said, using material provided by the local police chief. “This is a local issue, they have jurisdiction on this…. I want to remind you that the reason the light was there to begin with is the loss of a human life. Now I’m not going to ask you to quantify how much the life of one of your loved ones is worth.”

State Representative Gene G. Abdallah (R-Sioux Falls) took issue with that characterization, pointing out that the camera was set up at the intersection specifically because it was one of a handful in the state where right turns on red are prohibited. Many motorists get tickets at the location not knowing they have done anything wrong.

“That is nothing but a traffic trap,” Abdallah said. “Unfortunately, someone was killed on that corner. Is there a camera on every corner where someone is killed?”

If the bill is passed by the full state Senate and signed by the governor, South Dakota would become the sixteenth state to ban automated ticketing machines. Five other states are considering joining the list by enacting photo enforcement prohibitions. The bill’s other primary co-sponsors included Jamie M. Boomgarden (R-Chancellor), Elaine Elliott (D-Aberdeen), Jenna Haggar (I-Sioux Falls), Mark Kirkeby (R-Rapid City), Betty Olson (R-Prairie City), Lance S. Russell (R-Hot Springs) and Charles M. Turbiville (R-Deadwood).

Source: PDF File House Bill 1161 as passed (South Dakota Legislature, 2/8/2011)

[Courtesy:Thenewspaper.com]

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

5 Comments on “South Dakota House Votes to Ban Photo Enforcement...”


  • avatar
    340-4

    Good for the people of South Dakota!
     
    Also pleasant to see that Montana has banned them as well.
     
    They don’t sound that popular. From Wikipedia:
     
    “Redflex has lost in every ballot against photo enforcement of traffic laws where the referendums allowing voting on the matter were not legally challenged.”
     
    Five minutes on the internet tells me all I need to know about this company. Sell, sell!

  • avatar
    jjster6

    “This situation right here is a matter that should be addressed to the Sioux Falls city council,” state Representative Stace Nelson (R-Fulton) said, using material provided by the local police chief. “This is a local issue, they have jurisdiction on this…. I want to remind you that the reason the light was there to begin with is the loss of a human life. Now I’m not going to ask you to quantify how much the life of one of your loved ones is worth.”

    To Respresentative Stace Nelson… you just quantified what you think of a human life.  Give the job of protecting human life to a for-profit company, that shortens yellow light lengths to up revenue, and causes far mor accidents than it ever prevents.  And do that while denying the protections afforded by the US Constitution.

    Apparently South Dakota is not populated by a bunch of sheep that listen to the spoutings of Representative Nelson.  Remember him/her at election time!!!

  • avatar
    DXPower

    In the 2000’s, many speed cameras were installed in France. People started to trick the system for example by transforming a “6” into an “8” with black tape, putting mud on the plate number or steeling plate numbers in airports. Some people even attacked the speed camera with a hammer, an other guy was placing explosives until he lost his hands after a wrong manipulation. No matter the stupidity and stubbornness of people, speed cameras helped to tremendously reduce the number of death on the road.
    Speed is now more enforced; it’s annoying because you constantly have to check your speedmeter, but it apparently saves lives.

    • 0 avatar
      George B

      DXPower, most automated camera enforcement in the US is clearly to generate local government revenue, not to improve safety.  The most common violation is not stopping behind an arbitrary white line before making a right turn at a red light.  The second most common violation is to be making a left turn and getting caught by an unexpectedly short yellow.  Since the private companies earn more money when more people break the law, intersections are modified to make it more likely that motorists are caught on camera making a minor infraction.  Whenever there is a trade-off between revenue and safety, length of yellow timing for example, local governments seem to always pick the more revenue option.
       
      Analysis by former Duncanville, TX city councilman Paul Ford.
      http://www.paulfordreports.com/4701.html

  • avatar
    DXPower

    In the case of an intersection as described in the link, this is indeed a very likely possibility. But what about a speed camera on the highway ? What about a speed camera in a school zone ? I also would like to see a system to detect car that refuses priority to pedestrian when they cross and it’s green for the pedestrians. I,m fed up risking my life everyday. There isn’t enough cops, and we don’t want more cops, but people are not always respectful either.

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • AK: @theflyersfan – I totally get it. I got lucky and a local dealer had two BRZ in stock in late November AND...
  • FreedMike: I don’t think you have to be a constitutional scholar or scientist to weigh in on this.
  • Master Baiter: “month-long clouds of wildfire smoke that lower air quality to New Delhi levels…”...
  • Master Baiter: “Also look for loopholes being exploited as for what constitues a non-light duty vehicle.”...
  • TR4: @ ollicat: Batteries have been around for over 200yrs. Mr. Volta built the first one around 1800. They became...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber