By on January 16, 2011

The first of some 400 lawsuits pending against Toyota in the wake of the unintended acceleration scandal will go to trial by 2013, reports Bloomberg. U.S. District Judge James V. Selna has asked plaintiff lawyers to select “bellwether” cases from the hundreds of personal-injury, wrongful-death and economic-loss suits pending against Toyota to go to trial by 2013. Selna didn’t specify what types of cases would become bellwethers, cases which crystallize the case’s arguments and provide precedent for damages in other cases, but he did state that evidence discovery for them should be wrapped up in 2012. But before any of the federal trials open, there are still state-level trials to be heard. According to Bloomberg

Selna told the lawyers today that two state-court cases involving sudden-acceleration allegations are scheduled to go to trial in Texas in February and March of next year. Wylie Aitken, who is the attorney maintaining a liaison with state cases, said during a break in the hearing that both of those cases are personal injury claims.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

8 Comments on “Toyota Trials Start In 2013...”

  • avatar

    No doubt the venue-shopping in this installment of the witch hunt has been well-orchestrated. And any judge who wants to eventually get promoted by a Democrat administration will know just what to do…

  • avatar

    When those seeking wealth and lacking “proof” via the USA legal (not justice) system a jury trial is demanded while legal pundits maintain that when emotionality is not the best method to “win” a case that a jury trial be avoided and to request that a  judge determine who wind and who loses the case.
    Exceptions surely exists but the above is what I have read in various venues discussing the USA legal system designed to maximize the wealth/income of  those involved in the USA legal system.

  • avatar

    This should be interesting. In watching the football this weekend the Toyota ads were pervasive. They’re pushing the “Safe” system hard. Coincidence? Doubtful.

    • 0 avatar
      Sammy Hagar

      All the manufacturers exploit the safety spiel; they need a gimmick to sell you on buying their latest model…even though your 4-year old Accord/Fusion/Passat/etc. was safer than any car that came before it.

      Why look at Daimler & their latest ad spots: They’re trying to guilt people into buying a Benz by directing us to their website to view owner videos about crashes. Apparently, the children of relative wealth need to be better protected than the rest of us, right?

      If you’re really concerned about your life, keep your most recent car and get a treadmill or elliptical. It’s definitely cheaper…

  • avatar

    A family man has gone free based on Toyota problems:

    Toyota also settled $10m lawsuit for the Lexus ES300 with the wrong floor matts.

    Some cases Toyota will win, some they’ll loose. It’s factored in the price of a car.

    • 0 avatar

      “Family man” was guilty, he got off because a judge was a ignorant about cars or jumping on the blame Toyota bandwagon apparently. 1996 camrys didn’t have a computer controlled throttle, it was the old cable system.

  • avatar
    Sammy Hagar

    I’m actually surprised that I’ve yet to see a personal injury lawyer commercial on daytime television targeting Toyota.  Though I think these lawsuits are mostly a pathetic money grab, it would be nice to shake up the normal commercial block of “The-Scooter-Store/Wilfred Brimley/Vince Shlomi & his “Slap Chop”/Extenze cockhardner/Tax Masters/Roni Deutch/Etc.”

  • avatar

    So let me get this straight- hundreds of people, who are too stupid to be driving a car, got their gas pedals and brake pedals mixed up, many of them removing themselves from the gene pool in the process but some of them taking out innocent people.  The result of this is a lot of vampires, vultures, and ambulance chasers (oops, Freudian slip- personal injury/tort lawyers) get richer instead of having productive jobs that actually contribute to society and cars are a little more expensive.  Nice.
    Note, none of my negativity is directed towards legal system professionals who actually DO contribute to society and make the world a better place.  Just the other ones on billboards and giant ads in the yellow pages.

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • DenverMike: It’s fine if you leave it stock, tires everything. It’s hilarious though when you have the dude in the...
  • Jeff S: @Master Baiter–Ohio charges about $200 per year for EVs and $100 for hybrids with other states like...
  • FreedMike: Body by Line-X. Classic. Probably durable, though.
  • FreedMike: Congrats, Jeff! Just saw one of those in that neat metallic orange today.
  • Jeff S: @Dave M.–It is the HOA that will not allow the solar panels but that could change. I am downsizing from...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber