By on December 16, 2010

Class action attorneys have set their sights on a South Carolina town that set up a freeway speed camera in defiance of state law. Since August, the town of Ridgeland has allowed the private company iTraffic to operate a speed camera system to mail tickets worth $133 to $300 each to the owners of vehicles photographed as they pass through a tiny stretch of Interstate 95. The fully automated system is housed in a recreational vehicle that is usually concealed behind a bridge. When state legislators heard of the town’s plan, they unanimously enacted a law to prohibit the use of speed cameras (view law).

“We have been told by some of the top legal minds in the state that statute don’t have anything to do with us, so that’s why we’re continuing with the program,” Ridgeland Mayor Gary W. Hodges said at a press conference earlier this month.

Hodges did not identify the “top legal minds,” but it did not include state’s chief legal authority, Attorney General Henry McMaster, who issued two opinions finding that Ridgeland had no authority to use speed cameras or mail citations (view opinions). As the town of 2500 has already issued around 4000 tickets worth at least $533,000, Hodges has a significant incentive to keep the program running for as long as possible. He argues that having a police officer paid by iTraffic sitting in the RV constitutes legally permissible “operation” of a speed detection machine. Attorney Pete Strom is not convinced and wants to hear from ticket recipients in anticipation of a lawsuit that would, if successful, end the program.

“The Strom Law Firm is currently investigating the legality of this issue,” Strom wrote. “We have issued a Freedom of Information Act request in an effort to discover exactly what the relationship between iTraffic and the city is and how the money is being collected and distributed between the town of Ridgeland and the state of South Carolina.”

Another attorney, Ray Lord, has also expressed interest in filing suit. If Lord and Strom are right, it could prove costly for the town. Last year, a federal judge ordered Minneapolis, Minnesota to issue $2.6 million in refunds to motorists who received tickets in the mail from a red light camera program that lacked state legal authority (view decision). The controversy has upset Hodges, but he vowed to defend the iTraffic program fully.

“We’re quite bitter over here,” Hodges said. “We’ve been pounded over and over… We’re going to stand up and fight.”


Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

5 Comments on “South Carolina: Legal Challenge to Renegade Speed Trap Town...”

  • avatar

    If I were an enterprising business owner I’d rent billboards just outside the city limits of Ridgeland warning tourists about the speedtrap,  I’d offer a free happy meal to anyone who got ticketed and can show me proof.  I’d also encourage folks to voice their opinion about the trap to the civic fathers and boycott businesses of the town.  This would get wrapped up quickly!

  • avatar
    Dr. Kenneth Noisewater

    Doesn’t the state police have a tow truck (or can contract out one) to pull this RV off the road?

  • avatar
    Mr Carpenter

    Yes.  State Police should impound the truck then go arrest the “city fathers” of this burge and the state D.A. should immediately indict them on extortion with menaces charges – amongst other things – and leave them rotting in jail (by means of a $10 million bail). 

    I bet it would get cleaned up in about a week. 

    Won’t it be nice if/when we ever can get a society put together where EVERYBODY – including those who Swear to God and Man to uphold the law – actually make an honest attempt to do so?

    I know, I know, I’m expecting way too much of humanity.  But I can dream, can’t I? 

  • avatar

    From what I’ve heard, is how a lot of small towns in South Carolina operate.

  • avatar

    @Mikeolan- sources?
    Ridgeland is a throwback. 25 years or more, there were a lot of towns in the Deep South that preyed on out of towners (Yankees) for revenue. Tickets for 37 in a 35, impossibly short deceleration zones, etc. Most of them have disappeared but you still occasionally run across a mayor like Buford T. Pusser Hodges.

Read all comments

Recent Comments

  • BOJO: It seems to me Honda has a plan for their vehicle owners to upgrade to a new car. Rust is part of that plan. In...
  • DenverMike: When was the last time it did? 1963? The danger of death is about zero, more of an annoyance, common to...
  • FreedMike: @Art: Supply issues and inflation contributed, but consumers were clearly the ones who “jacked...
  • FreedMike: Good point. I read somewhere that Tesla sources almost all of its’ batteries from Panasonic; the...
  • speedlaw: As someone who has kept a Honda product running 230k miles, in Salt Land. Honda is very good at knowing...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber