Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against South Carolina Speed Trap

The Newspaper
by The Newspaper

A federal class action lawsuit was filed Monday against the notorious speed camera trap in Ridgeland, South Carolina. Three law firms teamed up to make the case against the town’s outspoken mayor, Gary Hodges, members of “the local police department and iTraffic, the private company that operates the cameras on Interstate 95. The case was filed on behalf of residents of Greer, South Carolina; and Dunnellon and Kissimmee, Florida.

“Defendants have conspired to deprive plaintiffs’ and class members’ property through illegal and unlawful arrests and have collected fines and bonds absent jurisdiction in violation of the constitution, the Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments and 42 U.S.C. Section 1985,” attorney Pete Strom wrote in his filing with the court.

The lawsuit questions whether Ridgeland can legally use a state uniform traffic ticket to issue a citation under a municipal ordinance. It questions whether a municipal court can take jurisdiction over a driver served with a ticket in the mail, or whether personal service is required. It also asks whether the ticket issuing procedure represents a violation of the constitutional right to due process.

“The plaintiffs and the class alleged that defendants conspired to violate their civil rights to issue and improperly serve illegal State of South Carolina Uniform Traffic Tickets primarily for the purpose to generate revenue for the town,” Strom wrote. “The plaintiffs and the class have suffered damages as a result of the defendants’ civil rights violations, resulting in improper forfeiture of bond and costs associated with court procedures.”

The suit seeks an injunction prohibiting use of the freeway speed camera program and monetary damages. Speed cameras and red light cameras are illegal under South Carolina law ( view statute). The Strom Law Firm, Rutherford Law Firm, and Lord Law Firm will argue the case.

[Courtesy: Thenewspaper.com]

The Newspaper
The Newspaper

More by The Newspaper

Comments
Join the conversation
 2 comments
  • .5MT .5MT on Dec 23, 2010
    The case was filed on behalf of residents of Greer, South Carolina; and Dunnellon and Kissimmee, Florida. I'm surpised the power structure of Ludowicci(?) GA didn't join in. Also.... Atapulgus... :(
  • Speedlaw Speedlaw on Dec 23, 2010

    If the cameras are illegal under South Carolina law, ignoring the photo summons should not cause action by the SC DMV. if DMV won't do anything, then there is no effective enforcement, especially if you are from another state...... This looks like an Arizona situation. Just ignore the letter.

  • Jeff Good find I cannot remember when I last saw one of these but in the 70s they were all over the place.
  • CoastieLenn Could be a smart move though. Once the standard (that Tesla owns and designed) is set, Tesla bows out of the market while still owning the rights to the design. Other companies come in and purchase rights to use it, and Tesla can sit back and profit off the design without having to lay out capital to continue to build the network.
  • FreedMike "...it may also be true that they worry that the platform is influencing an entire generation with quick hits of liberal political thought and economic theory."Uh...have you been on TikTok lately? Plenty of FJB/MAGA stuff going on there.
  • AZFelix As a child I loved the look and feel of the 'woven' black vinyl seat inserts.
  • Aja8888 Maybe he's putting the cost savings into Cybertruck production?
Next