VW's Indian Division Outsourced To Suzuki?

Cammy Corrigan
by Cammy Corrigan

Running a multi-national car company the size of, say, General Motors, Ford or Toyota means having lean, efficient operations. In the SUV/light trucks segment, turning a profit is easy. Because of the inherent profitability of these products, your operations don’t need to be that efficient to turn a decent profit. Where you really need to concentrate on profits is the other end of the scale. The small car market. This is where raiding the parts bin, nicking a platform from another division and moving production to a low cost country are taken as read when producing a plan for your next small car. But what if you’re trying to break into a market where small cars need to be firmly in the “four figures” price bracket? Well, this is the problem that Volkswagen is having in India. Like China, every car maker wants a piece of this Asian Tiger Elephant, but Volkswagen just simply doesn’t have the presence there to make their cars profitably. Or do they?

DNAIndia reports that Volkswagen and Suzuki may have found a solution on how to both expand in India. Maruti Suzuki says that contract manufacturing is possible with Volkswagen India. The MD of Maruti Suzuki, Shinzo Nakanishi, said “…there is a possibility of an original equipment manufacturing deal with VW, like the way with have with Nissan…Maybe.” What a tease! Especially if you know a little about Asian ambivalence. In short, Suzuki may manufacture cars like the Polo or Jetta for Volkswagen using their existing infrastructure. Much like Nissan buying Suzuki Altos, which are manufactured in India, and re-selling them as a “ Nissan Pixo“. The idea would make a hell of a lot of sense. Volkswagen, by simply leveraging an investment which they own, wouldn’t need to spend any more money to invest in India, Suzuki would increase their production volume, which, in turn, would make their cars more profitable and further cement their reputation as “India’s number one car maker”. And goodness knows Maruti Suzuki needs profits; in fact, they need some good news as soon as possible.

Cammy Corrigan
Cammy Corrigan

More by Cammy Corrigan

Comments
Join the conversation
 4 comments
  • Goacom Goacom on Aug 05, 2010

    But VW has just opened up a huge factory in India to produce the Polo and Vento (extended platform of the Polo with a trunk)there. I think they are targeting around 150K/yr during the initial phase. They will probably also rationalize production with Skoda who are also in India. Until Suzuki and VW start sharing components, I don't see much happening. A good start would be for VW to share its diesel engines with Suzuki. Likewise, VW could utilize Suzuki's small gasoline engines. The base version of the Polo has a 1.2L 3 cylinder engine, which is relatively unrefined and probably costlier than Suzuki's new generation 1.2L 4 cylinder engines.

  • Th009 Th009 on Aug 05, 2010

    Automotive News reports that the contract manufacturing would be for export, not for Indian domestic market.

  • Joe65688619 My last new car was a 2020 Acura RDX. Left it parked in the Florida sun for a few hours with the windows up the first day I had it, and was literally coughing and hacking on the offgassing. No doubt there is a problem here, but are there regs for the makeup of the interiors? The article notes that that "shockingly"...it's only shocking to me if they are not supposed to be there to begin with.
  • MaintenanceCosts "GLX" with the 2.slow? I'm confused. I thought that during the Mk3 and Mk4 era "GLX" meant the car had a VR6.
  • Dr.Nick What about Infiniti? Some of those cars might be interesting, whereas not much at Nissan interest me other than the Z which is probably big bucks.
  • Dave Holzman My '08 Civic (stick, 159k on the clock) is my favorite car that I've ever owned. If I had to choose between the current Civic and Corolla, I'd test drive 'em (with stick), and see how they felt. But I'd be approaching this choice partial to the Civic. I would not want any sort of automatic transmission, or the turbo engine.
  • Merc190 I would say Civic Si all the way if it still revved to 8300 rpm with no turbo. But nowadays I would pick the Corolla because I think they have a more clear idea on their respective models identity and mission. I also believe Toyota has a higher standard for quality.
Next