Marchionne Wants The Unions To Show Some Respect

Cammy Corrigan
by Cammy Corrigan

Sergio Marchionne’s turnaround of Fiat was a weird one. He turned around a company, which most people thought had died already. Sergio’s turnaround was helped by GM’s unwitting “ re-capitalization” of Fiat, too. Recently, worker relations in Italy have been strained, to say the least. If you thought the situation with the UAW in the United States was bad enough, in Italy, things are spicier than Mamma’s Arrabbiata sauce. The Financial Times UK reports that Sergio Marchionne has finally lost patience with unionized Italian workers and has threatened them to change their mindsets or else be out of a job. The end of September is their deadline. Mr Marchionne wants Italy to help drag Fiat (and Chrysler) into one of the top five car companies in the world. But to do that, he needs concessions from his Italian workers. Big ones.

One of his main bugbears is the Pomigliano plant near Naples. He’s going to invest €700m into re-tooling it for the new Fiat Panda. In return for his largesse, he wants the unions there to achieve productivity on par with Fiat’s Polish plant (the Pomigliano plant only runs at 25 percent capacity at the moment), which will mean jobs cuts. The unions put it to a vote and came out 62 percent in favor of changing their ways. Great, eh? No. Fiat claims that 62 percent isn’t enough for the union to guarantee the changes that Fiat want in a sustainable fashion. If Fiat can’t get resolution on this deal, then this will severely hamper Marchionne’s 5 year plan, and as far as Marchionne is concerned, that isn’t happening! What makes this story interesting (as the Financial Times points out) is that this isn’t a game of poker where there are bluffs and counter bluffs. Fiat has stated quite clearly that if the unions don’t change their ways, production will move. There’s very little ambiguity. Now, if the unions don’t change their ways and Fiat does move production to a plant that will play ball, who will the Italian unions blame? Whatever the outcome, one thing is clear. Tony Soprano never had this trouble.

Cammy Corrigan
Cammy Corrigan

More by Cammy Corrigan

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 11 comments
  • Djn Djn on Jul 01, 2010

    That plant, near Naples was built by then government owned Alfa Romeo to build the Alfa Sud in the 1970's. The location was chosen by the government to create employment in the south. Its been a disaster every since with poor quality and labor problems. They should probably shut it down. Government running companies.....

  • Tricky Dicky Tricky Dicky on Jul 01, 2010

    There's four different unions in the plant and three of them can see the benefit of Marchionne's plans, even if they don't smile at the same time. The difficulty is really with the far left FIOM union. Fiat don't want to leave the Panda in Tychy because they'd love to expand their production of the 500, which shares a line with the Ford Ka. That's running over 100% capacity. Interestingly, Fiat haven't yet suggested what an alternative would be to not taking the Panda to Pomigliano. I think there will be more hard ball, union-baiting comments to come, before any decisions are made. It's going to be a long, hot summer in Napoli.

  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
Next