Arizona: 127,000 Voters Pledge Opposition To Photo Radar

The Newspaper
by The Newspaper
We’re committed to finding, researching, and recommending the best products. We earn commissions from purchases you make using links in our articles. Learn more here
arizona 127 000 voters pledge opposition to photo radar

The group announced yesterday that 127,000 Arizona voters had made it clear that they want voters decide the future of automated enforcement in the state. The figure fell short by about ten percent of the number legally required to force a measure onto the ballot against the will of lawmakers. Initiative proponents see this as a merely temporary setback. Arizonans Against Photo Radar Chairman Shawn Dow believes that his group is stronger than ever and will be able to flex its political muscle to force change in the state.

“We received more signatures than all of the candidates for governor combined, yet they can get on the ballot and we can’t,” Arizonans Against Photo Radar Chairman Shawn Dow told TheNewspaper.

A team of volunteers delivered 8000 fully signed sheets of signatures, each containing fifteen names, yielding 120,000 names. Another 1000 half-filled sheets were counted in a preliminary look by officials from the secretary of state’s office. The final figure is the equivalent of 12.8 percent of the votes cast in the 2008 presidential primaries and 5.5 percent of votes cast in the general election. The initiative got just 66,000 fewer signatures than Barack Obama received votes in the primary.

“With an all-volunteer crew, you’re limited to working on weekends — and there wasn’t a single weekend without an event,” Dow said. “It was hard work getting that far. We did not stop, not for one minute.”

The group brought the signed petitions to Governor Jan Brewer’s office to convince her to push the legislature to place the initiative on the ballot and let voters have the final say in the matter. If Brewer fails to act, Dow suggests one of Brewer’s primary opponents may be interested in picking up the support of photo radar opponents. The second prong of the group’s revised strategy involves taking the referendum effort to individual cities where collecting hundreds of signatures — as opposed to hundreds of thousands of signatures — is a much easier task.

Maryland residents took the same strategy after just barely falling short of collecting enough signatures for a statewide anti-camera referendum on a tight deadline. Under a local battle strategy, 62 percent of voters in the town of Sykesville insisted in May on sending the traffic camera companies packing. No photo enforcement program has ever survived a public vote.


The Newspaper
The Newspaper

More by The Newspaper

Join the conversation
2 of 6 comments
  • 68camaro 68camaro on Jul 30, 2010

    I don't like the idea of banning the cameras. I think you can do things to make the systems work better and make sure that the city's don't game the systems. Banning technology that has the ability to keep us safer on the streets without really sacrificing anything seems ridiculous to me.

  • Truthhurts Truthhurts on Aug 02, 2010

    There is always a group of people that are opposed to enforcing laws- in this case, apparently they couldn't find enough people in AZ that would fall for it. The cameras keep the roads safer because they change driver behavior- which is the point.

  • Analoggrotto Buyers are skipping these in droves and heading down to sign the golden paperwork for a new Telluride. ATPs speak volumes and we have 'em. Our customers are telling us that we offer Mercedes quality for a better deal, and our suite of luxury features rivals any luxury automaker. Insult me all you want, but AVMs, DSDs and BSODs tell the truth.
  • Ted Lulis The Exodus from California is mind-boggling. No surprise from the rectum of the country
  • Mr Imperial Seeing the adjusted-for-inflation amount always makes me sick, I can't believe how much it has gone up in my 40-some-odd trips around the sun. Still fondly remember seeing these and Ford Explorers everywhere.
  • Kyl65759578 👋
  • ToolGuy I appreciate the thoughtful comments from the little people here, and I would like to remind everyone that Ford Motor Company offers a full range of vehicles which are ideal for any driving environment including New York City. The size and weight our of product portfolio has been fully and completely optimized to be friendly to the planet and friendly to pedestrians while consuming the bare minimum of resources from our precious planet (I am of course a lifelong environmentalist). Plus, our performance models will help you move forward and upward by conquering obstacles and limits such as congestion and your fellow humans more quickly at a higher rate of speed. I invite you to learn more at our website.Signed, William Clay Ford Jr.