GM To UAW: Take This Job And Keep It

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer
gm to uaw take this job and keep it

When the music finally stopped at Old GM, the UAW’s VEBA fund was left holding a lot of IOUs. On those merits, the union’s benefit trust was given about 17.5 percent of the equity in the bailed-out and re-organized New GM. UAW leadership has always maintained that having its membership’s benefits staked on the company’s financial performance would not change its mission, and that VEBA’s representative on GM’s board, Steve Girsky, would operate free from union influence. And one hopes he would, considering he’s being paid well to advise CEO Ed Whitacre. But the tension between GM’s IPO sprint and the UAW’s non-VEBA interests never goes away, and the Wall Street Journal [sub] is reporting that the latest spat is over the old hobbyhorse of buyouts.

The UAW apparently thinks its 2006 again, and is “pressing” GM to bring back buyouts. These cash-for-quitting offers were the preferred method of getting rid of workers who had become too senior to afford, under such great GM CEOs as Rick Wagoner. And the union’s argument is rife with the attitudes of the bad, old days. Let’s not sully the subtleties of the WSJ’s take:

If GM doesn’t thin its ranks, scores of veteran factory workers in the next few years will find themselves without jobs or unemployment benefits.Laid-off factory workers once could remain on GM’s payroll for years receiving almost full pay and benefits, but now they can remain on the rolls no longer than two years before their company-paid unemployement benefits run out.

See? Before, laid-off workers could receive full pay and benefits for years, and now laid-off workers only receive benefits for years. And now, having cut costs all over, GM isn’t interested in paying experienced workers to learn. With production steadily expanding, GM has “restored or created 9,100 jobs” since bankruptcy, and under two-tier wage structures those new workers are being paid competitively. So the old guys who are making nearly twice as much should get their own private bailouts, at the expense of GM’s financial health (on which the larger union’s benefits depend)? Time Magazine knows what’s up, and chronicles the toxic effects of two-tier wages on the union, complete with quotes like “It destroys solidarity.”

But GM doesn’t want to go back to 2006, when it paid $3.8b to buyout 34,000 workers (do the math). With today’s announcement it has essentially ruled out any further buyouts. Now it’s up to the UAW to balance its own competing interests and do the right thing.

Join the conversation
2 of 6 comments
  • Greg Locock Greg Locock on May 19, 2010

    Those redundacy payements were negotiated in good faith by adults on both sides. They traded off higher immediate pay rises for long term benefits. With 20/20 hindsight, perhaps one side or the other miscalculated. If in your wage negotiations you never had to consider the long term implications of your contract that merely demosntrates your misunderstanding of the situation.

  • Boyphenom666 Boyphenom666 on May 20, 2010

    Somebody needs to get it through the union's head that the old days are over. The customer comes first and if the customer isn't getting the best car for his money, he is going to go somewhere where he can. You would think that riding market share from 50% down to 20% (and even less in passenger cars) would have been enough to teach them this lesson, but apparently they haven't learned. The same customer-first mentality is also applicable to shareholders. Shareholders are also your customers and if shareholders can't get an adequate return on their investment, the stock price is going to go nowhere. The UAW may not care, but what about all those shares of GM and Ford stock that are going to be in the 401K plans of employees?

  • JMII Its an SUV so I am shocked they don't already offer it.
  • Analoggrotto As we Tesla owners receive our life energy from the greatest son of the gods of all time, Elon Musk; His cherubs and His nephilim may remove whatever they wish from us for unto him we owe all for our superiority above all the rest of humanity.
  • Kcflyer Nice to see California giving NY some competition to be the worst run state in the union.
  • Wolfwagen I see my comment was deleted (BTW nice way to censor) so i will say it again:GTFO here with the pseudo "wealth distribution" BS. A crime is a crime is a crime.Its a slippery slope, what happens next, Jail a rich guy when he kills a pedestrian and let the poor guy who kills a pedestrian walk? What about if the poor guy is a crappy driver and has the record to prove it then what?Or we could go crazy and just institute the death penalty across the board for every driving infraction. That will make people better drivers or stop driving altogether which will make the greenies happy (damm it I just gave them an idea - SOB!!!)
  • Wolfwagen No. Bring back the J80 with an inline six and reduced electronics (i.e. no giant touch screen) and they will probably sell like hotcakes