Daimler Probed By Russia After DOJ Shakedown

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

Have you ever done serious business in Russia? Nyet? If you want to keep your conscience pure, don’t. It’s a “gotta pay to play” country. If you don’t make regular payments, the best that can happen to you is that you are out of business. In more serious cases, you pay with your life – a common currency in that country.

Behind that backdrop, it’s humorous to read that “the Russian Prosecutor-General’s Office has asked the United States to provide information about corruption that reportedly accompanied the sale of Mercedes limousines by Russian law enforcement agencies, Prosecutor-General Yuri Chaika told the Federation Council.” That according to Russia’s news agency ITAR-TASS. (It’s “sale to law enforcement agencies.” Someone with lesser English may have made a payment. See video.)

“When the news was broken that the US Department of Justice exposed corruption that accompanied the sale of Mercedes cars to Russian law enforcement agencies, we called a special meeting at once,” Prosecutor-General Yuri Chaika said. The meeting was most likely about who got how much money, and were the proper amounts forwarded to the higher-ups. Chaika said he sent the letter to DC three weeks ago. No reply has been received in Moscow: “We are waiting for the results from the United States,” Chaika said.

On March 25, the Russian Kommersant newspaper reported that officials may have received more than $5 million between 2000 and 2005 as payoffs. ITAR-TASS’s competition at RIA Novosti says that was “7.8 percent of the total worth of the contracts signed during that period.” The meetings will most likely center on the fact that Daimler got a good deal. The “commission” payments should be higher. The New York Times reported that “ordinary Russians pay more than $3 billion in bribes annually and that businesses paid $316 billion.”

The Russian Defense Ministry already complained that they received no money. “Russia’s Defense Ministry rubbished on Saturday media reports of corruption linked to purchases of Daimler AG vehicles,” says RIA Novosti. (Re “rubbished,” refer to video.) Simple: “The Defense Ministry has never purchased and does not purchase Mercedes vehicles,” a Defense Ministry spokesman said. No sale, no kickback. Vy ponimayete meniya?

The SEC ordered Daimler’s Russian unit to pay $27.4 million in fines, as part of a $185m settlement between Daimler, the Department of Justice (DOJ,) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

Is that a case of “Thank you, I already gave in Washington?” That won’t work, it will just make the Russians angrier. Given that the U.S. Treasury made $185m out of a measly $5m payment to the Russians over 5 years, one can have sympathy with the Russians: “Discrimination! Those bleeping Amerikanski got all the money and bought nothing!”

Daimler spokeswoman Ute von Vellberg said the company is willing to cooperate fully with the local authorities. And by now, we should have developed an idea how that works. The cost of doing business is spiraling out of control.

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 15 comments
  • Juniper Juniper on Apr 29, 2010

    Sorry Bertel but it's still corruption and those involved are corrupt. Smear all the honey on it you want if you're involved you are just a business whore, nothing more.

    • Bertel Schmitt Bertel Schmitt on Apr 29, 2010

      Now there is another honorable profession that can sell its services unencumbered in many parts of the world.

  • Tricky Dicky Tricky Dicky on Apr 30, 2010

    Thanks Bertel - once again your sardonic humo(u)r re: the Russian bribery has cheered up my Friday afternoon.

  • Theflyersfan The wheel and tire combo is tragic and the "M Stripe" has to go, but overall, this one is a keeper. Provided the mileage isn't 300,000 and the service records don't read like a horror novel, this could be one of the last (almost) unmodified E34s out there that isn't rotting in a barn. I can see this ad being taken down quickly due to someone taking the chance. Recently had some good finds here. Which means Monday, we'll see a 1999 Honda Civic with falling off body mods from Pep Boys, a rusted fart can, Honda Rot with bad paint, 400,000 miles, and a biohazard interior, all for the unrealistic price of $10,000.
  • Theflyersfan Expect a press report about an expansion of VW's Mexican plant any day now. I'm all for worker's rights to get the best (and fair) wages and benefits possible, but didn't VW, and for that matter many of the Asian and European carmaker plants in the south, already have as good of, if not better wages already? This can drive a wedge in those plants and this might be a case of be careful what you wish for.
  • Jkross22 When I think about products that I buy that are of the highest quality or are of great value, I have no idea if they are made as a whole or in parts by unionized employees. As a customer, that's really all I care about. When I think about services I receive from unionized and non-unionized employees, it varies from C- to F levels of service. Will unionizing make the cars better or worse?
  • Namesakeone I think it's the age old conundrum: Every company (or industry) wants every other one to pay its workers well; well-paid workers make great customers. But nobody wants to pay their own workers well; that would eat into profits. So instead of what Henry Ford (the first) did over a century ago, we will have a lot of companies copying Nike in the 1980s: third-world employees (with a few highly-paid celebrity athlete endorsers) selling overpriced products to upper-middle-class Americans (with a few urban street youths willing to literally kill for that product), until there are no more upper-middle-class Americans left.
  • ToolGuy I was challenged by Tim's incisive opinion, but thankfully Jeff's multiple vanilla truisms have set me straight. Or something. 😉
Next