By on April 23, 2010

Automotive News [sub] reports that 19 rejected Canadian GM dealers have been given the green light to sue GM as a class, rather than go through the arbitration process that is being used to resolve dealer cull disputes in the US. The dealers are suing GM for breach of their dealer agreements, and for failing to provide compensation beyond wind-down costs. They argue that the arbitration process would be expensive for dealers, non-transparent to the taxpayers who funded GM’s reorganization, and would put GM at an unfair advantage.

One dealer explains:

For GM it would have been divide and conquer and control the flow of information.

Superior Court Judge Sarah Pepall agreed, ruling that the dealers have a common cause against GM and should be able to pursue their claims jointly in public court. Another lawsuit by Canadian GM dealers, naming both General Motors and its Canadian counsel, and alleging misconduct in the execution of the Canadian dealer cull is still pending. The very public drama between GM and its dealers that began with its bankruptcy-era cull of 1,573 dealerships may be nearly a year old now, but it’s showing few signs of stopping any time soon.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

8 Comments on “Canadian Judge: Forget Arbitration, Culled Dealers Can Sue GM...”

  • avatar

    i’d like to see the dealers win but wouldn’t the money to settle the lawsuits ultimately come from taxpayers?

  • avatar

    television ads can be fictional. the truth about cars is GM in court.

  • avatar

    There is a certain irony that the dealers who required their customers to sign arbitration agreements are also being forced to arbitrate their disagreements with GM Corporate.

    • 0 avatar


      While the irony is delicious, the BK really should have eliminated this as an option.

      Proving once again that the blind chick’s scales are balanced merely by whomever throws the biggest pile of cash on one side. Even in Canada.

  • avatar

    BTW, nice picture of rural Quebec in high summer, Ed.

    GM Canada did not file for bankruptcy. You are applying US sensibilities to a different situation entirely.

  • avatar

    Being a dual citizen, I spent many years working north of the border. Franchise laws vary from province to province, and are much more stringent than in the US, as is the market. Hell, I know of a Mercury dealer in Alberta that sold 300+ new cars last year. There are states that don’t achieve that number. The comparison is invalid.

  • avatar
    Geo. Levecque

    Somehow there would be no dealer anywhere in this Country(Canada) selling the Mercury brand, it was killed years ago by Ford!

    Also the picture may be of Quebec in Winter, its certainly not Winter now, temperature this week in Eastern Canada averaged 16 to 20C!

    Warmer weather on the way too!

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Corey Lewis: No internet yet, so no.
  • Tagbert: Yes, Elon would spread doubt on pouch cells because that is not what Tesla uses. In fact there are lots of...
  • Corey Lewis: What an amazing and powerful marketing thing AWD has become, eh?
  • dal20402: I leased one of these Civics (a 2006 EX manual) for three years. It was basic transportation that was...
  • bd2: This move to only-AWD is likely a temp move until the arrival of the RWD models (FWD is not seen as...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber