Mercedes Falls Behind BMW In India

by Cammy Corrigan

Published: January 4th, 2010

If you hear a loud screeching noise coming from the Stuttgart area, that’ll probably be Dieter Zetsche berating his Asian management team. The Economic Times of India reported that the Mercedes-Benz marque has lost its leadership of the luxury car segment in India to BMW after nearly ten years on top. Daimler also posted a 10.43% decline in sales in India, as volume fell to 3,247 units (if that doesn’t seem like much, consider that Mercedes also trails BMW in China by about 60k units to about 90k). And just like that, out come the excuses: “We are behind BMW in 2009 because of limited availability of our E-Class car … I don’t want to focus on leadership. We want to have a profitable growth,” Mercedes Benz India Managing Director and CEO Wilfried Aulbur told reporters. “We see a very strong growth in 2009 and it will be a blockbuster year for us. We are very bullish and we expect, it will be a high double-digit growth.”

However, Daimler have not hit the (semi) nuclear option of offering discounts to move vehicles. Wilfried Aulbur said “The focus is on profitable growth, overall discount is detrimental and it is not our focus. Just to generate volume is not a good strategy.” Herr Aulbur also believes that lack of uniform taxes on cars are also to blame. Aulbur said, “We need fair treatment across the line that will lead to volume and it will lead to investment. I want uniform tax for all car.” . According to the Economic Times of India, small cars are subject to an 8% excise duty while bigger cars are levied at 20%, with an additional 15,000 Indian Rupees for cars having engines between 1500cc and 2000cc, while cars with engines bigger than 2000cc have to pay 20000 Indian Rupees. Is Herr Aulbur seriously suggesting that a Hyundai i10 should have the same tax as a Mercedes-Benz E class? With logic like that, no wonder they’re losing market share in India.

#BMW #Daimler #India #Luxury #Mercedes #Sales

Cammy Corrigan

More by Cammy Corrigan

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 7 comments

BuzzDog on Jan 04, 2010

I wish that Herr Zetsche would focus less on production volume, and more on the quality of build and materials. The Mercedes-Benzes I coveted as I was growing up had two key characteristics: Rock-solid quality and relative scarcity. Those things well justified their premium price.

Like Reply
Psarhjinian on Jan 04, 2010

Mercedes' problem is that they're not really able to understand that they make mistakes. All of the German marques do this, but Daimler is the worst: in their minds, everything they do is brilliant. On top of that, there's whole rafts of people who've built their careers enforcing this echo chamber. You can't fight this once it's taken hold, because any sign of reticence or admission of fault is seen as a critical weakness. You can never be wrong, because if you're wrong about one thing, you might be wrong about everything. So you make damn sure you're never seen as being wrong, and you build the house of cards ever higher until it collapses spectacularly. If this sounds a lot like the D3 in general, and the General in particular, it should.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.