By on December 8, 2009

GOP Rep. Steve LaTourette and local auto dealer Alan Spitzer (courtesy:cleveland.com)As soon as GM and Chrysler agreed to review their dealer cull decisions, the culled dealers in question began complaining that the review would not improve their situations. According to the aggrieved dealers, the new review would be based on the same allegedly flawed data as the initial cull, meaning nothing would be changed. By GM’s own admission, only 39-51 of the over 1,000 dealers cut would even stand a chance at reinstatement. Now, Automotive News [sub] reports that a new measure has passed the House of Representatives which would allow dealers to “present any kind of relevant information during the arbitration.” The measure comes in the form of an amendment to the House Financial Services bill, which is headed to a conference committee in which House and Senate leaders must arrive at a compromise in order to send the bill to President Obama.

The National Automotive Dealer Association had criticized the GM and Chrysler review process, saying:

NADA appreciates the good faith and constructive dialogue we have had with GM as we try to build a consensus to ensure that GM and its dealer network are as successful as possible. GM’s announced plan to address the issue of dealership closings is a positive step, but we do not believe it establishes a sufficiently meaningful process that provides for a reasonable opportunity for dealer reinstatement.

But strangely, the passage of this revision has not drawn NADA’s unqualified support:

NADA supports this approach unless GM and Chrysler agree to an alternative that addresses dealer concerns. The revised amendment would give affected dealers transparency and the right to arbitrate. The arbitrator would balance the interests of the dealer, the manufacturer and the general public. Regrettably, the revised amendment would not provide compensation for affected dealers.

The revised LaTourette amendment is part of the final negotiations on a year-end spending bill necessary to keep the government operating. These leadership-driven negotiations on the broader bill will occur during the next few days. The language could be accepted, rejected or modified. NADA is working aggressively with all parties to achieve a meaningful opportunity for dealer reinstatements.

The Detroit News reports that another round of meetings between GM, Chrysler and their culled dealers is under way. The battle continues…

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

One Comment on “Culled Dealers Dig In Over Deal...”


  • avatar
    gslippy

    Bring ’em all back and let them die natural deaths.  Then they can complain to the consumers.  I’m tired of hearing about dealer welfare.

    One mega-dealer near me is losing Saturn, Hummer, Saab, and Pontiac.  Good thing they took on Nissan, Infiniti, Subaru, Hyundai, and Kia a few years ago, to help out their GMC, Buick, and Cadillac sales.  What timing.

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • volvo: Maybe the range is comfortable because as Some wit once told me that “To Americans 200 years is a long...
  • 28-Cars-Later: Not in the market but maybe a Conti. Maybe, and I imagine they’d want $700/mo for it the way...
  • Hummer: Even accounting for the change in SAE ratings, the engine still produced much more power than 190 at its...
  • PandaBear: If I read correctly, he also went from 16″ to 15″.
  • Mike-NB2: I have steelies and winter tires on my ’19 GLI but wasn’t able to drop a rim size due to brake...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Contributors

  • Timothy Cain, Canada
  • Matthew Guy, Canada
  • Ronnie Schreiber, United States
  • Bozi Tatarevic, United States
  • Chris Tonn, United States
  • Corey Lewis, United States
  • Mark Baruth, United States