Ford September Sales Slip 5 Percent
If you’re looking for proof that shoppers are avoiding the auto industry’s bailout babies, here’s the final piece of evidence you need: Not only did Ford outperform GM and Chrysler during Cash For Clunkers, but it’s also weathering the post-clunker decline with a mere five percent September decline compared to GM and ChryCo’s 45 and 42 percent drops. Across every segment, Ford is proving resilience that cannot be explained by mere product comparisons. Perception feeds reality, and the perception that Ford has not received a federal bailout is clearly helping the Blue Oval move metal.
Ford-branded vehicles led the way for Ford’s “core” brands, with a mere four percent decline. Mercury (-16 percent) and Lincoln (-21 percent) followed with 5,443 and 5,980 units sold respectively. Volvo was the big surprise, actually increasing 16.3 percent to 4,716 units sold.
The new Taurus was the biggest Ford-brand gainer, enjoying a 60 percent sales increase and cresting 5,000 units sold. Fusion also increased, although by only nine percent. Still, that was enough to drive sales over the 10k mark. Mustang was up a flat .1 percent, while Focus slid 11.3 percent. Flex gained 3.8 percent, continuing that model’s steady growth. Escape was down only 5.1 percent while Edge dropped 32.5 percent. F-Series and Ford Heavy Trucks increased 3.5 percent and 4.5 percent respectively, with Ranger dropping 47.6 percent and Eonoline off 10.9 percent. Transit Connect kicked off US sales with 1,527 units sold.
Mercury saw Grand Marquis gaining 34.2 percent, but with only 2,146 units sold, the victory was purely Pyrrhic. Merc’s next-best competitor was Milan, down 5 percent. Otherwise, Mariner was down 32.3 percent, Mountaineer fell 36.8 percent and Sable tanked 88.3 percent to an anemic 92 units sold.
Lincoln was down across the board, with a 2.7 percent decline in MKZ sales the only number resembling a ray of light. MKX was down 13.6 percent, MKS dropped 27.5 percent, Navigator fell 31.8 percent and Town Car shed 54.5 percent, ending under 500 units.
Volvo’s relative increase was strong, but volume numbers tell the real story. S40 (+114 percent) was the top volume nameplate with 903 sales. XC90 (-20.3) hit 882 units, while the new XC60 cracked 828. S80 was down only 13.1 percent, but at 502 units, the volume was insignificant. XC70, S60, V50 and C70 all failed to reach 300 units. The C30 barely escaped that category by adding 19.6 percent to 317 units.
Ford’s non-Ford brands continue to struggle to make a case for their continued existence. In fact, the only thing you can say for them is how surprisingly stable they are, given all the turmoil in the luxury segment. On the other hand, stability at volumes of under 6,000 units per month is nothing to write home about. If Ford can keep making easy profit on these brands it will face no motivation to eliminate or significantly improve them. However, it will be sowing the seeds of its own decline once its bailout-free halo fades. With more premium Ford-brand products like the Taurus and Flex showing signs of strength, one imagines that either Lincoln or (more likely) Mercury will be phased out in the foreseeable future.
Join the conversation
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- Art Vandelay Dodge should bring this back. They could sell it as the classic classic classic model
- Surferjoe Still have a 2013 RDX, naturally aspirated V6, just can't get behind a 4 banger turbo.Also gloriously absent, ESS, lane departure warnings, etc.
- ToolGuy Is it a genuine Top Hand? Oh, I forgot, I don't care. 🙂
- ToolGuy I did truck things with my truck this past week, twenty-odd miles from home (farther than usual). Recall that the interior bed space of my (modified) truck is 98" x 74". On the ride home yesterday the bed carried a 20 foot extension ladder (10 feet long, flagged 14 inches past the rear bumper), two other ladders, a smallish air compressor, a largish shop vac, three large bins, some materials, some scrap, and a slew of tool cases/bags. It was pretty full, is what I'm saying.The range of the Cybertruck would have been just fine. Nothing I carried had any substantial weight to it, in truck terms. The frunk would have been extremely useful (lock the tool cases there, out of the way of the Bed Stuff, away from prying eyes and grasping fingers -- you say I can charge my cordless tools there? bonus). Stainless steel plus no paint is a plus.Apparently the Cybertruck bed will be 78" long (but over 96" with the tailgate folded down) and 60-65" wide. And then Tesla promises "100 cubic feet of exterior, lockable storage — including the under-bed, frunk and sail pillars." Underbed storage requires the bed to be clear of other stuff, but bottom line everything would have fit, especially when we consider the second row of seats (tools and some materials out of the weather).Some days I was hauling mostly air on one leg of the trip. There were several store runs involved, some for 8-foot stock. One day I bummed a ride in a Roush Mustang. Three separate times other drivers tried to run into my truck (stainless steel panels, yes please). The fuel savings would be large enough for me to notice and to care.TL;DR: This truck would work for me, as a truck. Sample size = 1.
- Ed That has to be a joke.
This article helps to provide some context: http://www.automotive-fleet.com/News/Story/2009/10/Ford-Fleet-Sales-Up-in-September.aspx
@TEXN3: Yes, but VAG uses the Passat platform on several models and marquees and I would gander, in several more countries than where Ford offer’s the D3-cars. I don’t know if that is a fair comparison. The current Passat platform is used for exactly three cars: VW Passat, VW Passat CC (if you count that as a separate model rather than a bodystyle) and Skoda Superb. Additionally, there are the VW Sharan and SEAT Alhambra minivans, which I forgot about (and which add about 40K of annual volume). That's no more models than the Ford D3. Selling in more countries? Well, that's up to Ford and VW, is it not? The point really is that the D3 does not fully benefit from platform economies of scale, whereas the Passat does. (Notably VW's new MQB architecture will cover over 3M cars per year ...) What Marchionne wants to achieve for Fiat is VW-style platform volumes, not what Ford gets with the D3. I will note here that the new Focus platform (once unified on a single platform again) should see volumes close to 1M units per year, so it will not suffer from the D3 platform's high costs.