Why Isn't ChryCo Dodging NASCAR?

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

Dodge doesn’t compete in NASCAR to test new technology. Nor does NASCAR highlight fundamental attributes of Dodge vehicles the way, say, Subaru’s rally competition does. So why stick around when resources are so tight? “NASCAR fans love performance and Dodge fans love to win,” explains Michael Accavitti, Director of Dodge Brand and SRT Marketing at Chrysler Blog. “It’s always been a match made in heaven and we intend to remain involved in the NASCAR sport for the foreseeable future.”

We currently have seven teams representing Dodge, which we truly believe is the right level this year. In the past, we’ve sponsored as many as 12 cars at one time. Our experience showed that we spread our resources a little bit too thin. We’ve never been a big organization; we’ve always prided ourselves on being more nimble and smaller than the other guys to succeed. We’ll strike that appropriate balance where we can have a good Sunday afternoon for our Dodge fans. That’s what it’s really all about. So we’ve refocused our resources on fewer teams to produce better results, and I think that’s what you’re seeing on the track this year.

Refocused? So why are Dodge-backed teams still waiting on ChryCo for money? And yet, despite the “procedural issues,” even the new Italian bosses are behind the effort.

It’s worth noting that Fiat has already proven to be a valuable partner. From a corporate and engineering standpoint, Fiat is quickly offering us new technologies for production vehicles, and that technology sharing can carry over to motorsports. Anything that we could use, and that NASCAR would allow us to use in this sport, is something that we would certainly want to look at.

But in this statement lies the essence of why NASCAR simply isn’t worth the effort. Specifically, the “anything NASCAR would allow us to use” part. New fuel injection technology? Forget it. Traction control? Ha! Hybrid powertrains? What is this, Formula 1? If Dodge is going to enter the 21st Century, technology has to be fundamental to its performance image.

In this sense, NASCAR is a historical deadweight anchoring Dodge to the past. Which would be bad enough on the brand level alone, but this atavistic approach is more than just evident in Dodge’s products: it defines them. Challenger sales have already started to drop off as the novelty of its retro looks falls victim to its utter lack of value as a sports car. Yet, as long as NASCAR remains Dodge’s sole motorsport focus, there’s little chance of developments filtering their way into retail products. Creating sporting vehicles which attract sustained interest and enthusiasm requires more than NASCAR’s time-warp retro racing as a draw. It might not make sense for Dodge to withdraw from NASCAR completely, but the time has come to think about making a right-hand turn.

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 21 comments
  • Ronnie Schreiber Ronnie Schreiber on Aug 23, 2009

    My prediction is that the Koni Challenge series, running real production based Mustangs, Camaros and Challengers, will be a hit. The smartest thing NASCAR could do is switch the Nationwide series to actual "stock" cars based on the above revived pony cars.

  • Rpol35 Rpol35 on Aug 23, 2009

    Why single out Dodge? If it is true for them, then it is true for GM, Ford & Toyota. As a matter fact, I don't believe Toyota ever had a push-rod V8 engine from which to draw and they, I believe, are the least likely of all NASCAR participants though they have adapted and done well. Dodge is probably the most likely candidate as a Dodge Charger more closely resembles its Sprint Cup car version. While admittedly not real close, it's closer than a FWD Impala, Fusion or Camry. NASCAR is not designed to be a R&D workbench for the auto industry. I'm not sure what it is really supposed to be as the old mantra of "Win on Sunday, sell on Monday" is long gone. It's entertainment I guess; I think it's a stretch calling it a sport.

  • Lorenzo Soon, the rental car lots will be filled with Kia's as far as the eye can see!
  • Lorenzo You can't sell an old man's car to a young man, but you CAN sell a young man's car to an old man (pardon the sexism, it's not my quote).Solution: Young man styling, but old man amenities, hidden if necessary, like easier entry/exit (young men gradually turn into old men, and will appreciate them).
  • Wjtinfwb Hmmm. Given that most Ford designs are doing relatively well in the marketplace, if this was forced I'd bet it was over the S650 Mustang. It's not a bad looking car but some angles seem very derivative of other makes, never a good trait for a car as distinctive as Mustang. And if he had anything to do with the abysmal dashboard, that's reason enough. Mustang doesn't need the "Tokyo by Night" dash arrangement of a more boring car. Analog gauges, a screen big enough for GPS, not Netflix and some decent quality plastics is plenty. The current set-up would be enough to dissuade me from considering a new Mustang.
  • Lorenzo Aw, they don't need a designer - just put modern underpinnings on a 1955 Ford Fairlane. Stellantis could revive Chrysler and Dodge by putting modern mechanicals on a 1955 Imperial and 1955 Dodge Coronet.
  • Lorenzo For both models, and their larger Accord/Camry models, the crash test ratings are very close, but only for late year models. The pre-2010 Civic and Corolla both fold like a cheap suit in a crash. If you're looking for a safer 10 year old vehicle, buy a truck.
Next