Piston Slap: 2006 Saleen Mustang Convertible S281: Pedigree Pony or a Handful of Horse—?

by Sajeev Mehta

Published: August 5th, 2009

piston slap 2006 saleen mustang convertible s281 pedigree pony or a handful of

Joe writes:

Last Christmas, my wife bought me a 2006 Saleen Mustang Convertible s281. As it was winter in Idaho and the last week of the year, what with Saleen Corp announcing that it would be filing for bankruptcy, the dealership was very eager to remove this very beautiful car from their showroom.

I would like to think that the Saleen could be a decent long-term investment. That being said, it is just an S281 model, no supercharger. So do I hope I made a good investment and keep the car as built? (Really sucks that a kid in a 300zx can keep up with me.)

To protect the car’s collectibility, should I upgrade the power with very expensive Saleen parts, or forget about long term resale and go with other superchargers that provide more bang for the buck?

Sajeev replies:

Unless you’re happy waiting 30 years, paying thousands a year to keep her pristine and putting fewer than 10,000 miles (3000 miles per year) on it, the Saleen Mustang Convertible s281’s collectibility factor is minimal. Even if you do, it’s a crap shoot. With or without superchargers. Want a good long term investment? Buy a condo in Miami in the next year or two . . . or something like that.

Please, stop thinking of this car as an investment: it’s a black hole. Only now are certain (i.e., low mile, fairly unique) Fox Body Saleens pulling out of their depreciation curve with a somewhat large number of followers. And I don’t see them fancy-Fairmonts reaching Barrett-Jackson boner-worthy BOSS 429 status any time soon. Or maybe ever.

That said, having fun while your money burns isn’t so bad. Upgrading your “pedigree” with a Saleen supercharger and the necessary upgrades to bump it to a higher-echelon package is a good idea. Saleen receipts and anything else “Saleen” (that you can get your hands on) accomplishes what you want: keeping kids in Z-cars away; and the period-correct upgrades stand the test of time.

But the Mustang’s beauty lies in its blizzard of performance options available from countless entrepreneurs: not just the guys with savvy marketing, cozy relationships with Ford and a turnkey solution to a problem. After speaking to Mr. Saleen and other famous names at press/enthusiast conferences, I’ve noticed their solution changes when a new answer makes them more money. While not always a bad thing, it kinda broke my heart when they’d marginalize past accomplishments at the altar of the almighty dollar.

And the Fox Body generation (once again) proved that the best Mustangs are wild and free: not show horses with pedigree-enhancing papers. I’m remembering the INCON twin turbo kit, TFS Twisted-Wedge heads, Griggs road-race suspension and Baer brakes: with zero support from the likes of Ford or Saleen. I spent my formative years reading tech articles of such manufacturers in MM&FF magazine, so Saleen never really excited me. (Or Roush, for that matter.)

But you are not me. (That’s a compliment . . . trust me.) And you already have a Saleen, a vehicle I’d never consider in the first place. So do whatever you think is right for your money’s future and be happy. Then wait for the right buyer to come along when you’re ready to sell.

[Send your technical queries to mehta@ttac.com]

Sajeev Mehta

More by Sajeev Mehta

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 21 comments

RogerB34 on Aug 05, 2009

"That’s true, cheap gas and horsepower go hand in hand."... My only brand new personal car was a 57 Bel Air HT, 3278 lbs, V8 283, 185 HP BRAKE. My 05 Accord Coupe, V6, 3124 lbs, V6 183, 240 HP SAE NET. The Honda has brakes, suspension, ride, handling, reliability, mpg that weren't dreamed of 1957. You can't go home again. Who would want to?

Like Reply
Joemoc1 on Aug 06, 2009

Thanks to all of and especially Sajeev for posting my question. I will probably keep this a while and go with a SC in the near future. For now this car is a whole lot of fun and I intend to enjoy it while I can afford to drive it and still look young enough to own it. The car does constantly bring a smile to my face and so very many compliments. The kid in the 2nd gen 300z was modified. (I do like the 2nd gen 300 Z's by the way.) As far as the corvette comments against Mustangs, I bought this low enough to say dollar for dollar I am sure I got the better deal. I could put 8 or 9 k$ into this car and still be half the price, with equal or better performance. In the past we have been thru a couple of mustangs and they are an emotional attachment to the past and the great marrage I have. Joe

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
FreedMike If Dodge were smart - and I don't think they are - they'd spend their money refreshing and reworking the Durango (which I think is entering model year 3,221), versus going down the same "stuff 'em full of motor and give 'em cool new paint options" path. That's the approach they used with the Charger and Challenger, and both those models are dead. The Durango is still a strong product in a strong market; why not keep it fresher?