By on July 21, 2009

Red light cameras have come under fire recently for focusing on vehicles that make right turns on red, a maneuver that is rarely responsible for causing an accident. But even cities that do not issue many right turn tickets focus on another type of violation that is not dangerous. According to data obtained from the city of Fullerton, California, tickets mailed to the owners of vehicles entering a through intersection less than a second after the light turned red added up to nearly $1 million last year. These technical violations rarely cause accidents. A 2004 Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) study showed that right angle accidents—the type caused by straight-through violations of red signals at intersections—do not happen until an average of nine seconds after the signal had changed from yellow to red (view study).


“With one exception, all of the right-angle crashes occurred after five seconds or more of red,” the TTI study explained. “Closer inspection of the one exception revealed that it occurred very late at night with both vehicles violating their respective red indications at about the same time.”

According to figures compiled by The Newspaper, the dangerous violations — those issued for entering an intersection five or more seconds after the light turned — accounted for just eight percent of Fullerton’s citations. By comparison, twelve percent of the $396 tickets went to vehicles that missed the light by the duration of the blink of an eye — 0.3 seconds or less. A total of fifteen tickets worth $5940 went to vehicles that entered an intersection less than 100 milliseconds after the light had turned red. These 2008 data are consistent with a report by the California State Auditor that found 77 percent of red light cameras tickets were issued for split-second violations in 2001.

Had Fullerton extended the duration of the yellow light at its intersections by just one second, these violations would not have happened. The 2004 TTI study confirmed that when an extra second of yellow was added to the bare minimum amount of yellow time, both accidents and violations decreased. A Georgia law that took effect in January required the addition of a second of yellow at camera intersections. It resulted in a drop in violations of between 70 and 80 percent.

Fullerton’s data also show that the number of tickets issued does not necessarily decline over time as a result of changing driver behavior. First, each month, the percentage of citations issued varied between 46 and 73 percent of the detected violations. Both the city and the vendor can reject a citation for any reason. By adjusting this variable, the vendor can reduce or increase the number of tickets, as desired. Second, the red light camera vendor constantly adds new monitored approaches to ensure a steady increase in profit, as Fullerton attempted to do. Third, the cameras are prone to frequent malfunctions that keep the devices from functioning, reducing the number of tickets issued. For example, zero citations were issued at the intersection of Harbor and Chapman over a two week period in 2008.

“Context and signal views (are) playing in fast speed and not at same time,” a maintenance log entry reads for March 6. “Every Event. Cannot Cite. Checked newest events, they have same problem.”

The records show dozens of additional computer errors, the need to re-aim cameras and the need to install glare filters. These problems came to an end in December after a December appellate ruling declared the city’s red light camera contract illegal view ruling. Since then, Fullerton’s red light camera vendor, Nestor Traffic Systems, has gone into receivership.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

2 Comments on “California: Fullerton Makes a Million From Split Second Mistakes...”


  • avatar
    Wolven

    “Since then, Fullerton’s red light camera vendor, Nestor Traffic Systems, has gone into receivership.”

    Hurray!!! One small victory for Americans.

  • avatar

    Red light intersections where the yellow interval is set according to engineering principles have low rates of red light running.

    Red light intersections with cameras have an unusual problem. When violations drop off (everyone knows there is a camera there) the yellow intervals get shorter. No one can ever prove who did it.

    Check http://www.motorists.org for more. Happens all over the country.

    I’ve always thought that if the violation is important enough to ticket you for it is important enough to stop you at the site and let you know, not just send a letter in the mail later.

    Cameras don’t catch fugitives, drunks or suspended drivers.

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • FreedMike: @SCE: Penney’s actually emerged from bankruptcy (want to say it was 2019). My kid worked at a...
  • mcs: Let’s see now: “no infrastructure or capacity on the grid” Plenty of EVs on the road now and...
  • Lou_BC: @JMII – I tried to get a ZR2 Colorado through the small dealer chain my son works for. They had nothing...
  • 28-Cars-Later: I’ll been on both the logic and emotional sides personally and professionally. Professionally it...
  • Lou_BC: “The highest inflation rate in 40 years” Here is a vital bit of information lost on most people....

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber