Your Tax Money Hard at Work: GM Offers Discontinued Dealers a $1M Kiss Off

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

For the last ten years or so, the United Auto Workers (UAW) has pretended to make “concessions” to General Motors while doing nothing more than accepting pay-offs consisting of lump sums and promises to pay lump sums from fictional future earnings. Exhibit R: the fed’s recently promised $2.5 billion cash “top-up” of the UAW’s health care VEBA, ahead of other payment of other lump sums AND a slice of fictional future earnings. Automotive News [sub] reports that GM’s deep-sixed dealers are now playing grease my palm at wounded knee. “General Motors is offering some dealerships $100,000 to $1 million to wind down their businesses over the next 17 months, according to three sources familiar with the proposals.”


Let’s assume the average dead dealer gets a $500,000 kiss off. GM announced it was terminating 1124 dealers. I make that a $562 million pay off (as opposed to a zero dollar FO&D possible under bankruptcy law). I reckon we got a bargain mate! GM’s Oldsmobile termination reported cost GM a billion bucks, back when a billion was more than a rest stop on the way to $100 billion. Or a trillion. So, what do we get for our money?

The money is intended to help dealers sell their remaining inventories. But if the dealer accepts the payment, GM will not buy the unsold inventory. In addition, the dealer must agree not to sue GM until their franchise agreement expires. The terminated dealers also will not be allowed to order new cars from GM, yet they must stay in business until January.

GM’s army of the undead! And what’s with the “until their franchise agreement expires?” Does that mean we’re looking at hundreds of millions in federally-funded lawyers fees defending Government Motors against dealer lawsuits? Sure!

This, no doubt, at the same time that those discontinued dealers will land themselves the Small Business Administration loan guarantees to buy product GM won’t sell them. While we’re at it, I wonder where the funding for the freshly mandated GM dealership upgrade is gonna come from? Hey Tony?

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 9 comments
  • John Horner John Horner on Jun 03, 2009

    I'm on record saying these dealer closures are a bad idea. Paying them cash money to go away just makes it dumber. Paying employees to go away at least reduces a real, measurable ongoing cost. Paying a customer to go away, doesn't.

  • Golf4me Golf4me on Jun 03, 2009

    I don't get it...wasn't one of the advantages of C11 the ability to pare the dealer network without such payouts? They could have done this years ago ala Oldsmobile! At least Chrysler had the balls to cut the cord clean. GM is dithering already in only it's 2nd day of C11. That can't be good.

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I'd rather they have the old sweep gauges, the hhuuggee left to right speedometer from the 40's and 50's where the needle went from lefty to right like in my 1969 Nova
  • Buickman I like it!
  • JMII Hyundai Santa Cruz, which doesn't do "truck" things as well as the Maverick does.How so? I see this repeated often with no reference to exactly what it does better.As a Santa Cruz owner the only things the Mav does better is price on lower trims and fuel economy with the hybrid. The Mav's bed is a bit bigger but only when the SC has the roll-top bed cover, without this they are the same size. The Mav has an off road package and a towing package the SC lacks but these are just some parts differences. And even with the tow package the Hyundai is rated to tow 1,000lbs more then the Ford. The SC now has XRT trim that beefs up the looks if your into the off-roader vibe. As both vehicles are soft-roaders neither are rock crawling just because of some extra bits Ford tacked on.I'm still loving my SC (at 9k in mileage). I don't see any advantages to the Ford when you are looking at the medium to top end trims of both vehicles. If you want to save money and gas then the Ford becomes the right choice. You will get a cheaper interior but many are fine with this, especially if don't like the all touch controls on the SC. However this has been changed in the '25 models in which buttons and knobs have returned.
  • Analoggrotto I'd feel proper silly staring at an LCD pretending to be real gauges.
  • Gray gm should hang their wimpy logo on a strip mall next to Saul Goodman's office.
Next