VW To Magna: "Us Or Opel"

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

It has been commented widely (and it doesn’t take a tall IQ to do so) that Magna might get problems with its parts customers (a.k.a. OEMs) when Magna starts competing with them through Opel. Didn’t take long: “Volkswagen AG said Wednesday Canadian auto parts supplier Magna International Inc. will face conflicts of interest following the planned takeover of General Motors Corp.’s (GM) Adam Opel GmbH unit,” Dow Jones Newswire reports from Germany. The threats are carefully worded:


According to VeeDub’s spokesperson Michael Brendel, “Volkswagen will monitor this development very closely.” Translation: Volkswagen Purchasing is talking to other bidders.

Volkswagen is a direct rival of Opel. Volkswagen is also a major customer of Magna. Magna also supplies components to Porsche, Volkswagen’s largest shareholder. Conflict of interest? Looks like it.

Large parts suppliers enjoy a tight relationship with auto makers. They often are embedded in the development process of a new car. If you want to know in detail what a auto maker plans for five years down the road, become one of their components suppliers. You will work with them, and they will work with you. Unless you also own a direct competitor like Opel. If you do that, your mugshot will be posted at Wache Sandkamp, the main entrance to Volkswagen’s HQ in Wolfsburg.

Volkswagen has another beef: “Tax money has been used to a large extent for Opel’s rescue.” Volkswagen would have rather seen Opel dead. Being propped up with tax money, AND run by one of their suppliers is a bit much for them to swallow. Other makers most likely see it the same way as Volkswagen.

Magna will have to decide: Auto maker or parts maker. I’d choose the latter.

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 21 comments
  • Kurt. Kurt. on Jun 05, 2009

    Agree with psarhjinian, All the automakers are tied up with each other anyway. The parts suppliers sell to multiple makers. The makers buy from each other (Routan ring a bell?). This is just political posturing.

  • Bimmer Bimmer on Jun 05, 2009
    psarhjinian and charly, it's not Serbank, it's Sberbank. And why would you add shares of Magna (with Canadian owner) to Sberbank (Russian government owned)? I don't see any logic in it.
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh A prelude is a bad idea. There is already Acura with all the weird sport trims. This will not make back it's R&D money.
  • Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
Next