Fitch Ratings Forecasts Massive Toll Increases

The Newspaper
by The Newspaper

A major credit rating agency yesterday released a report reinforcing a negative outlook on the financial stability of the toll road industry. Fitch Ratings analyzed the performance of forty US toll road facilities during 2007 and 2008. It predicted that the roads would not see a recovery from the recession until 2011 at the earliest and that motorists would be paying more money in tolls as a result.


“Fitch expects the cost of highway travel to increase in real terms — something that generally hasn’t happened in the US historically,” the report stated. “In other words the days of declining real toll rates may be gone. And while beneficial in the near term, higher toll rates over time could present challenges in the next downturn as the value of a low toll rate has borne itself out in this recession.”

The report emphasized how industry performance is at an all-time low. Traffic on thirty-three toll facilities dropped 4 percent in December 2008 compared to 2006 — the largest such plunge since data was first collected in 1970. Revenue did not fall as sharply as traffic because most of the toll roads introduced sharp rate hikes to cover losses. During the same period, stand-alone toll road revenue dropped only 1.5 percent. For some roads, that may not be enough.

“Most toll facilities have debt-service obligations that grow to varying degrees over the next several years, so anything more than a temporary decline in revenue would be problematic,” the report explained. “Several facilities within the dataset have actually raised rates and shown little to no revenue growth — indicating that they are already maximizing revenue and, at least for the near term, have no real ability to stem the losses. These assets also have a growing debt burden and, not coincidentally, they have the lowest ratings.”

Turnpikes, on the other hand, used their “near monopoly position” to boost rates on drivers so much that revenue increased 4.3 percent even though traffic plunged 6.4 percent. The New Jersey Turnpike, for example, raised driving costs by fifty percent. Still, no matter how high the rates are now, tolls will likely increase yet further after the economy recovers.

“Many of the toll increases put in place over the last year are funding essential system rehabilitation and/or expansion,” Fitch stated. “As a result, while revenue trends have outperformed traffic, more debt is being taken on — pushing the day of reckoning out a few years. It is Fitch’s view that traffic will remain stagnant over the next few years as the economy struggles to regain its footing and toll increases beyond those planned for will likely be needed on many facilities to maintain financial flexibility in the face of growing debt service.”

Fitch used the threat of rating downgrades to compel toll roads to make the desired toll hikes. A bad credit rating increases the cost of financing and could seriously harm the financial viability of a highly leveraged toll deal.

“To the extent individual facilities do not cut back on capital or are politically unable to raise tolls, rating action could be taken,” the report stated.

Overall, Fitch has downgraded or changed the outlook to negative on ten out of forty projects since its August report. Only two facilities improved.

The Newspaper
The Newspaper

More by The Newspaper

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 15 comments
  • RichardD RichardD on Jun 12, 2009

    "Currently, 50 percent of bus and ferry operations are funded by Bridge tolls," http://goldengatebridge.org/research/facts.php Pretty much answers the question of why the bridge toll is so high -- to subsidize uneconomic and inefficient modes of transport. From the same fact sheet: "Painting the Golden Gate Bridge is an ongoing task and the primary maintenance job."

  • Long126mike Long126mike on Jun 12, 2009

    Yes, the bridge is such a money pit. It only attracts a bajillion tourists from around the world and tolls are 2/3 less today than they were when it opened. Oy.

  • Slavuta Motor Trend"Although the interior appears more upscale, sit in it a while and you notice the grainy plastics and conventional design. The doors sound tinny, the small strip of buttons in the center stack flexes, and the rear seats are on the firm side (but we dig the ability to recline). Most frustrating were the repeated Apple CarPlay glitches that seemed to slow down the apps running through it."
  • Brandon I would vote for my 23 Escape ST-Line with the 2.0L turbo and a normal 8 speed transmission instead of CVT. 250 HP, I average 28 MPG and get much higher on trips and get a nice 13" sync4 touchscreen. It leaves these 2 in my dust literally
  • JLGOLDEN When this and Hornet were revealed, I expected BOTH to quickly become best-sellers for their brands. They look great, and seem like interesting and fun alternatives in a crowded market. Alas, ambitious pricing is a bridge too far...
  • Zerofoo Modifications are funny things. I like the smoked side marker look - however having seen too many cars with butchered wire harnesses, I don't buy cars with ANY modifications. Pro-tip - put the car back to stock before you try and sell it.
  • JLGOLDEN I disagree with the author's comment on the current Murano's "annoying CVT". Murano's CVT does not fake shifts like some CVTs attempt, therefore does not cause shift shock or driveline harshness while fumbling between set ratios. Murano's CVT feels genuinely smooth and lets the (great-sounding V6) engine sing and zing along pleasantly.
Next