By on June 20, 2009

Despite a brewing public revolt over the issue of photo radar, the Arizona State Legislature may be circling the wagons in an effort to defend lucrative automated ticketing programs. The Senate Public Safety and Human Services Committee voted 4-2 on Wednesday to increase the pressure on motorists by adding points to the drivers’ licenses of anyone receiving a freeway camera ticket, instead of offering relief by banishing the machines from the highways, as some had expected. A statewide signature drive to ban photo ticketing continues to pressure lawmakers, but influential lobbyists in the statehouse have won the first battle.


The following lobbied on behalf of adding points to freeway tickets:

  • Wendy Briggs, American Insurance Association
  • Lanny Hair, Independent Insurance Agents and Brokers of Arizona
  • Don Hughes, American Family Insurance
  • Don Isaacson, State Farm Insurance
  • Ellen Poole, USAA Insurance
  • Mike Williams, Arizona Highway Patrol Association
  • Redflex Traffic Systems of Australia

Each time a motorist receives a license point, his insurance provider can raise his rates anywhere from $50 per year to $1000 or more, depending on his driving record and the severity of the offense. With hundreds of thousands of photo tickets being issued on Arizona freeways, the legislative change represents the potential for millions in extra revenue for the industry.

The original push to remove license points actually came from American Traffic Solutions (ATS), the company that lost on on a bid to operate the freeway ticketing program to its arch-rival, Redflex. When points are not added to licenses, drivers are less likely to contest the ticket. ATS CEO James Tuton, 48, understands the plight of drivers in a personal way as he has been a frequent recipient of traffic citations himself.

On Wednesday, Tuton was scheduled to be arraigned before McDowell Mountain Justice Court Judge Michael Reagan for a violation. Tuton will not be able to get out of this ticket by going to traffic school since he already attended a class in December to avoid the consequences of a citation issued by one of his own photo vans.

Observers inside the state capital offered several explanations for the apparent change of heart of some lawmakers. The most obvious is that facing a $3 billion budget deficit, legislators need the $100 million brought in by the freeway program to avoid having to make tough choices about cutting state spending or raising taxes.

The second is that $16.50 from each photo radar ticket goes into a fund paid to the personal campaign accounts of politicians. Most importantly, however, sources noted that some lawmakers want insurance companies to have more of a reason to pour millions into a political campaign to defeat the citizen’s ballot initiative that would shut down the cameras for good.

In addition to adding points to licenses, the legislation introduced by state Representative John Nelson (R-Glendale) was amended to make a number of minor changes to the way photo ticketing programs operate. Signs notifying of the presence of speed cameras would also have to indicate the speed limit. Speed traps would have to be placed more than 200 yards from a speed limit change.

The state Department of Public Safety would have to release a report every six months on the amount of revenue collected by the ticketing program. The proposal now faces a debate in the full Senate and House where it would have to be approved before being sent to the governor.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

10 Comments on “Arizona Legislature Prepares to Defend Photo Radar...”


  • avatar
    ravenchris

    You want justice? Do not reelect incumbents.

  • avatar
    Corky Boyd

    I have a problem with points being assigned as a result of photo radar. The owner of the car is often not the operator, and it is up to the state to determine who was guilty of the moving violation to assign points. It is not the responsiblity of owner to prove he or she was not the operator. Unless the photo can prove who the operator was, the state has no case.

    About two years ago in a class action suit, the Minnesota Supreme Court determined that to be true under their laws. Points can no longer be assigned by photo radar, unless the state can prove who was operating the vehicle.

  • avatar
    fiasco

    Do you want justice? Don’t elect a Republican or Democrat.

    I see a representative of my auto insurance provider is one of those lobbying to add points to photo tickets. I’d write a letter to complain, but would probably get canceled.

  • avatar
    ttacgreg

    I am seriously developing a strong distaste for insurance companies.

  • avatar
    zoneofdanger

    I find it appalling that our elected representatives see fit to declare war on their constituents by passing oppressive speed camera laws, supported by an Australian company and insurance companies.

  • avatar
    Kurt.

    It’s not as easy as “don’t vote incumbants” or “rep/dem”. It is your responsibility to know who you are voting for and what they stand for.

    It is easier to say “If you vote this way, I will not vote for you” and then even if your vote has to go to a competing party, then so be it.

    Being pigeon holed into Blue and Red has blinded us to our ultimate responsibility.

    “Vote your Conscience!”

  • avatar
    vento97

    ravenchris:
    You want justice? Do not reelect incumbents.

    In NJ, there’s a grass-roots movement called GRIP (Get Rid of Incumbent Politicians). This movement needs to spread like wildfire nationwide….

  • avatar
    vento97

    Kurt:
    It’s not as easy as “don’t vote incumbants” or “rep/dem”. It is your responsibility to know who you are voting for and what they stand for.

    It is easier to say “If you vote this way, I will not vote for you” and then even if your vote has to go to a competing party, then so be it.

    Being pigeon holed into Blue and Red has blinded us to our ultimate responsibility.

    “Vote your Conscience!”

    To that I say – remember this:

    “Democrats and Republicans – First-world prosperity for themselves, third-world prosperity for the rest of us…”

  • avatar
    enigmaforever

    We must unite in this and vote out any money grubbing legislator who votes for this. How much is your legislator getting. (Just from a few of my files) From camerafraud.com This is Arizona=”Money from each photo enforcement ticket breaks down as follows: $16.50 to statewide public campaign financing, $13.48 to the Department of Public Safety, $25.17 to the Supreme Court of Arizona’s Administrative Office of the Courts, $29.70 to Redflex (the private photo enforcement company) and $96.65 to the State of Arizona’s general fund”. http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/27/2712.asp , Arizona “a ten percent surcharge was imposed on all traffic tickets to create the “Citizens Clean Election Fund.” The fund allows politicians to avoid tedious fundraising efforts.
    After raising just $5 each from 220 people in a district, candidates for public office qualify for public financing money to match private expenditures. In effect, these lawmakers collect $16.50 for their campaigns each time a photo radar ticket is issued on an Arizona freeway.
    This adds up to big money. In 2008, traffic tickets generated $10,095,771 in revenue for the clean elections fund. Out of this amount, $7,710,739 million was disbursed to lawmakers and candidates during the primary and general elections — an average of $72,063 each. In just the past four months, the new freeway speed camera program has already added another $3.3 million to the total amount collected for lawmakers. Over the past four election cycles, Arizona politicians collected a total of $36,265,795 in campaign cash from the tax on speeding tickets.

  • avatar
    enigmaforever

    OH, don’t forget the maybe in extra millions that insurance companies, and employers will have to pay to get a copy of the information on you. Your legislators care crap about you, that is now a proven fact.

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Imagefont: Excellent article and well said, every word.
  • HotPotato: If you plan to keep it long term, I don’t know about a twin-turbo Ford. Turbos are pricey to...
  • HotPotato: Seems like a great vehicle for a 1-car family. Quick, practical, refined, affordable, and you can charge...
  • HotPotato: Good for you, Tim. It would be nice if the troll brigade that dominates this blog’s comments section...
  • jalop1991: “We will bring back Infiniti as Nissan-plus…” Hey, Nissan–I know it’s 20 years old...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Matthew Guy
  • Timothy Cain
  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Chris Tonn
  • Corey Lewis
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber