Editorial: Curbside Classic: Pontiac Trans Sport and Transvertible

Paul Niedermeyer
by Paul Niedermeyer

Curbside Classics is all about serendipity. Good thing too, because how else would I be inspired to write 800 words about the Pontiac Trans Sport? And I don’t just mean stumbling across this bizarre Transvertible. Well, yes, that was good. But I also needed a regular Trans Sport to complement this flight of fancy. Easy, and boring enough. But take a look at the paperback tucked into the dash: John Steinbeck’s “The Wayward Bus”. Two for Two.

Steinbeck’s pessimistic story revolves around the stories of several “stuck” personalities, waiting at Rebel Corners for the

broken-down bus “Sweetheart”. We’ll skip all the human drama that can happen in one evening, and get back on the bus, after Sweetheart finally is running again.

It’s a rainy night, and the bridge to their “destination” is deemed unsafe. The choice put to the passengers by Juan, the driver, is to return to Rebel Corners, or take a dirt road. They choose the road. En route, he deliberately runs the bus into a ditch, telling the passengers it was an accident. After some more drama, the bus eventually heads for its destination. The passengers have resolved to make changes in their lives. Will they? And has a better metaphor for GM and the Pontiac Trans Sport ever been written?

Enough with the literary allegories. The Trans Sport was based on Pontiac’s 1986 eponymous concept. Yes, GM’s excitement division was given the lead in coming up with a response to the fabulously successful Caravan/Voyager mini-vans. The result was essentially a deliberate drive into

the ditch. Whereas Chrysler’s boxy family haulers were all about practicality, GM’s were about . . . well, what where they about?

GM’s had a curse when it comes to people haulers. It could never get past its Jetsons Motorama styling tendencies or technical overkill/suicide. Or both, simultaneously, like in this 1955 L’Universelle. The task was to come up with a VW bus competitor. The result: so baroque, complicated and expensive, with a FWD system powered by a Pontiac V8 engine, that it could not be put into production.

The Corvair Greenbrier almost got it right. Actually, it was a nifty piece of work, one of my favorites, and merits its own CC feature. But profitability was always the devil with the relatively complicated Corvair, especially compared to the cart-axle Econoline. GM’s equally dumb and cheap Chevy Van/GMC HandiVan soon killed the Greenbrier.

And history repeats itself, especially at GM, which seems to specialize in corporate amnesia. The Trans Sport concept was ambitious stylistically and in its packaging, gull doors and all. And it was built on GM’s vaunted space-frame technology, first pioneered on the Pontiac Fie

ro. If GM had done it right, they would have figured out a way to make a more prosaic boxy Chevy Lumina to compete against the Caravan, while still building a swoopy Trans Sport for the lovers of exciting mini-vans. All eighteen of them.

Instead, the dust-buster was badge engineered for Chevy and Oldsmobile too, for their um . . . oh, yes, the highly forgettable Silhouette. And they all were a big royal flop. And GM did the predictable: responded with the next generation minivans so conservatively styled to be utterly invisible.

But in GM’s desperation to salvage the first generation Trans Sport, radical ideas were solicited from the marketing mavens and development experts. A few niches were discovered and described, and the result was several prototypes were commissioned, including this “Transvertible”. Why not an open-air mini-van? And not really a convertible either, as a folding top for a van was

way beyond the technical expertise of the vaunted GM “skunk works.”

To be sold only in the Sun Belt, the Transvertible had a completely water-proof interior, borrowed from the boating industry. In fact, an advanced amphibious version was underway when the metaphorical plug was pulled on that overly-ambitious project. The prototype was last seen being towed out on a lake near the GM proving grounds, due to the difficulty in engineering a driveshaft for the proposed propeller.

But the “conventional” Transvertible prototype has survived, and miraculously ended up just blocks from my house. I’ve always hoped to run across a vaunted GM Motorama concept, like a Futureliner, but living in Eugene, I feel mighty privileged to be able walk past the Transvertible anytime I feel the need to steep myself in GM’s creative genius.

Speaking of steeping, Eugene’s rainy winters have not been overly kind to the interior components of the open-air concept. Perhaps that’s why it’s here, as part of a long-term weathering test. Although, according to a neighbor, it’s there because of “something to do with a divorce.”

Now that’s hard to figure. How could anyone’s wife not want to make sure she ended up with the ’vertible as part of a divorce settlement? Oh well; her loss is my serendipitous gain.

Paul Niedermeyer
Paul Niedermeyer

More by Paul Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 33 comments
  • Transvertible Transvertible on Jan 01, 2013

    Ok, first of all Mr. Niedermeyer, Do you make it a habit of trespassing onto people's property, (namely MINE) and photographing cars when someone (namely me) was going thru a very brutal divorce of 20 years and just lost my 4 kids. This car was GOING to be a car for my older kids prom at Crow High school. Your disclosure of my situation and posting it all over the internet is not only sleezy but shows that you have no respect for anyone including yourself. Yes this car was half done. Let me guess though for a moment: You have probably NEVER done anything custom in your life except for the critical commenting you do on various cars around Eugene Oregon you display on your curbside classics. I have been a machine shop owner for 25 years and a craftsman and to have some stranger as you not even have the decency to ASK ME if you can post potentially litigious material during my time of crucifixion is nothing short of uncalled for. As for the ensuing shark feeding frenzy, again, probably a bunch of non creative types that dont even know how to rebuild an engine, or weld, but experts at criticism. So I say to the automotive king of paparazzi Mr.Niedermeyer: MIND YOUR OWN BUSINESS and stop trespassing and hurting others just for your own twisted pleasure. For the record the car was supposed to just be for fun, and it was right up until the time I stumbled across your journalistic abortion. Due to my private matter of divorce (that you made public) I didn't get to finish it in time for the prom. At 70 mph your hair would not even move, try that in a 65 mustang!

  • RatherhaveaBuick RatherhaveaBuick on Feb 22, 2013

    Love these things...

  • TheEndlessEnigma These cars were bought and hooned. This is a bomb waiting to go off in an owner's driveway.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Thankfully I don't have to deal with GDI issues in my Frontier. These cleaners should do well for me if I win.
  • Theflyersfan Serious answer time...Honda used to stand for excellence in auto engineering. Their first main claim to fame was the CVCC (we don't need a catalytic converter!) engine and it sent from there. Their suspensions, their VTEC engines, slick manual transmissions, even a stowing minivan seat, all theirs. But I think they've been coasting a bit lately. Yes, the Civic Type-R has a powerful small engine, but the Honda of old would have found a way to get more revs out of it and make it feel like an i-VTEC engine of old instead of any old turbo engine that can be found in a multitude of performance small cars. Their 1.5L turbo-4...well...have they ever figured out the oil dilution problems? Very un-Honda-like. Paint issues that still linger. Cheaper feeling interior trim. All things that fly in the face of what Honda once was. The only thing that they seem to have kept have been the sales staff that treat you with utter contempt for daring to walk into their inner sanctum and wanting a deal on something that isn't a bare-bones CR-V. So Honda, beat the rest of your Japanese and Korean rivals, and plug-in hybridize everything. If you want a relatively (in an engineering way) easy way to get ahead of the curve, raise the CAFE score, and have a major point to advertise, and be able to sell to those who can't plug in easily, sell them on something that will get, for example, 35% better mileage, plug in when you get a chance, and drives like a Honda. Bring back some of the engineering skills that Honda once stood for. And then start introducing a portfolio of EVs once people are more comfortable with the idea of plugging in. People seeing that they can easily use an EV for their daily errands with the gas engine never starting will eventually sell them on a future EV because that range anxiety will be lessened. The all EV leap is still a bridge too far, especially as recent sales numbers have shown. Baby steps. That's how you win people over.
  • Theflyersfan If this saves (or delays) an expensive carbon brushing off of the valves down the road, I'll take a case. I understand that can be a very expensive bit of scheduled maintenance.
  • Zipper69 A Mini should have 2 doors and 4 cylinders and tires the size of dinner plates.All else is puffery.
Next