Bailout Watch 425: Chrysler is NSFWed. Still.

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

OK, first Chrysler Co-Prez Jim Press flies to Geneva (first class?) to schmooze with . . . not Fiat. Oh no. Press told the press that their alleged small car partner had already been to Auburn Hills and called it good. So no need to hang out with what the company’s touted as Chrysler’s savior. “No formal meetings planned,” to use the proper PR parlance [via Automotive News]. So . . . how’s that “satisfying the government’s conditions to score another $5 billion from the federal bailout buffet” thing doing? Great! “Jim Press said today that the automaker was ‘hopeful’ the automaker had all the criteria necessary to receive additional U.S. government loans.” Automaker, automaker, let me come in! Tell me exactly who owns shares in ChryCo. No? Well, then, let’s have a closer look at Press’ hopes, dreams and fears re: Chrysler’s progress on Uncle Sam’s loan criteria, shall we?

Bloomberg reports that the banks—who are required to swap $5 billion worth of debt for equity before Chrysler can mount its second raid on the public purse—aren’t playing ball. At all. And for good reason.

Chrysler LLC, needing lender concessions by March 31, isn’t negotiating with its banks because it can’t persuade them to discuss trading loans for uncertain equity, people familiar with the companies’ actions say . . .

“It’s going to be a tough sell to get the banks to give up their position for worthless equity,” said Don Workman, a bankruptcy attorney at Baker & Hostetler LLP in Washington. “The best Chrysler can hope is that the government is going to force them to do it.”

And how, pray tell could the U.S. government force banks to take the Mother of All Buzz Cuts? Well . . .

The banks, which include Citigroup Inc., Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Morgan Stanley and JPMorgan, would be first to be repaid in the case of a bankruptcy. By taking equity in exchange for debt, the banks would lose that standing they now have. The caveat is that each of the banks has taken U.S. government aid from the Troubled Asset Relief Program and may be subject to Treasury’s influence, Workman said.

“Influence?” Sounds like a job for current Cerberus Chairman and former U.S. Treasury Secretary John Snow! On this and other matters, none of the principals are saying anything—other than the extremely well compensated, jet-setting and hopeful Jim Press. Back to the art of the steal . . .

Owners take on liabilities and normally lose everything if the company goes into bankruptcy. Meanwhile, bank loans are secured against assets, such as plants, other buildings and brand names. These can be sold and the loan amounts recovered in the case of a restructuring or liquidation . . .

Chrysler told the government that banks may get 11 percent to 43 percent of their loans repaid in an “orderly wind-down” of the business.

Kaplan said the banks likely would prefer restructuring or liquidation to equity.

“If I am a secured lender, I can’t be worse off by staying the way I am,” he said. “I can only be worse off if I make the exchange, so I am not doing it. I’ll take my chances in bankruptcy.”

Our sources tell us that Cerberus has already mortgaged the entire company. In other words, assets? What assets? Unless there’s a huge Snow job afoot, ChryCo’s toast.

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 4 comments
  • Fincar1 Fincar1 on Mar 03, 2009

    RetardedSparks, you ask "how could the government, after castigating banks for a decade of reckless risk-taking, force them to make the mother of all bad investments?" I'd say, the same way they pretty much shoved them into lending mortgage money to people who should have been renters. Remember the Community Reinvestment Act? That was just the start. Then they got help from Freddie Mac and Fannie May; Farney Brank and his boyfriend.

  • Mtypex Mtypex on Mar 04, 2009

    So .... are there Chrysler assembly plants still operating, or are they shut for good? Not clear to me.

  • Justin You guys still looking for that sportbak? I just saw one on the Facebook marketplace in Arizona
  • 28-Cars-Later I cannot remember what happens now, but there are whiteblocks in this period which develop a "tick" like sound which indicates they are toast (maybe head gasket?). Ten or so years ago I looked at an '03 or '04 S60 (I forget why) and I brought my Volvo indy along to tell me if it was worth my time - it ticked and that's when I learned this. This XC90 is probably worth about $300 as it sits, not kidding, and it will cost you conservatively $2500 for an engine swap (all the ones I see on car-part.com have north of 130K miles starting at $1,100 and that's not including freight to a shop, shop labor, other internals to do such as timing belt while engine out etc).
  • 28-Cars-Later Ford reported it lost $132,000 for each of its 10,000 electric vehicles sold in the first quarter of 2024, according to CNN. The sales were down 20 percent from the first quarter of 2023 and would “drag down earnings for the company overall.”The losses include “hundreds of millions being spent on research and development of the next generation of EVs for Ford. Those investments are years away from paying off.” [if they ever are recouped] Ford is the only major carmaker breaking out EV numbers by themselves. But other marques likely suffer similar losses. https://www.zerohedge.com/political/fords-120000-loss-vehicle-shows-california-ev-goals-are-impossible Given these facts, how did Tesla ever produce anything in volume let alone profit?
  • AZFelix Let's forego all of this dilly-dallying with autonomous cars and cut right to the chase and the only real solution.
  • Zelgadis Elantra NLine in Lava Orange. I will never buy a dirty dishwater car again. I need color in my life.
Next