2 Views
Was This Trip Necessary? Pt. 2
by
Edward Niedermeyer
(IC: employee)
Published: February 13th, 2009
Share
There’s little debate that the Corvette is one of the things GM does do right. As in really right. But does this mean that the program deserves the resources for new concepts like this Stingray? Or does it mean that the money would be better spent working on mass-market offerings, where the track record is not so good? It’s your money (if you pay taxes); you decide!
{
"id": "9123920",
"alt": "",
"title": "",
"video_link": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/-iXXUjz7o28",
"youtube_video_id": "-iXXUjz7o28"
}
{
"width": 634,
"height": 357,
"showRelated": true
}
Edward Niedermeyer
More by Edward Niedermeyer
Published February 13th, 2009 11:52 AM
Comments
Join the conversation
If history repeats itself, then this is GM's Avanti. (Except the Avanti wasn't just a wet dream.)
This is merely an exaggerated concept, tone down the heavily accented design cues a bit, maintaining the stated elements and this is a good looking Vette. Loose the split window though, ugh!
Yes its EXTREME! Just what the Vette Needs! Not perfect but you talk about a traffic stopper!!! Ill bet the rest of the EXOTIC manufacturers HOPE G.M. doesn't build it. The Corvette is already a world class sports car and this design would Finally put in the SUPERCAR arena. I say 'go for it' and watch the rest of the automobile world reel in response..what would Jeremy Clarkston say? How about"outrageous" and that's what we Americans are and need to show the automobile world!!! as far as my tax dollars go,Id rather spend it on this than trying to educate some gun carrying thug, or giving a house to every American that whines in front of Obama.
Ok RF so how is the corvette brand, mis-branded?