U.S. Commission: Raise Federal Gas Tax and Start Monitoring

John Horner
by John Horner
u s commission raise federal gas tax and start monitoring

The recent historic drop in fuel consumption has translated into a $3b drop in taxes going into the Highway Trust Fund year-on-year. It’s a crisis! It’s a good thing that GW Bush signed into law the “ Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Ac t” back in August ’05. The Act empaneled the National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing Commission (NSTIFCT), and directed it to devise a new way to finance the Highway Trust Fund. Reuters has secured a draft copy of the commission’s final report. NSTIFCT’s recommending that Congress should raise U.S. gasoline taxes by 10 cents a gallon later this month, to “fix bridges and ease congested highways.” But that’s not all! “The gas tax is broken, so any increase in gas tax is just a Band-Aid,” commission member Adrian Moore said. “It gets you through a very short term. It doesn’t even remotely solve the problem.” Actually, the only thing broken about the federal gas tax is that it’s fixed at 18 cents per gallon. The tax hasn’t been adjusted for inflation– or any other factors– since it was last increased in 1993. But Mr. Moore doesn’t point out obvious fixes like indexing the federal gas tax to inflation, or otherwise periodically adjusting the tax based on the needs for highway spending. Anyway, Mr. Moore is down with pay-as-you go, we-know-where-you-are road pricing. Privacy concerns? No worry, Big Brother will not be a government agency, but a consortium of private road builders looking for a profit. Sort of like health insurance companies, only more intrusive. So which would you rather have, private toll roads and FasTrack monitoring everywhere, or gas taxes adjusted as needed to keep our highways in an adequate state of repair? Here’s hoping we get to make that choice.

Join the conversation
2 of 27 comments
  • MattPete MattPete on Jan 04, 2009

    I'm a fairly libertarian kinda guy, but the last thing we need to do is to privatize the roads. I'd happily pay an extra 50cents a gallon if that went to fund highway/road and other transportation projects. The infrastructure here in Northern Virginia is embarrassingly poor, if not outright crumbling.

  • PeteMoran PeteMoran on Jan 05, 2009

    How complex is road funding in the USA? I'm keen to know. In Australia we have three tiers; nationally important, state and then city/county roads. National roads get funding from our federally raised via a flat excise on fuel (which doesn't cover the costs) and income taxes. State roads are funded from state budgets with their revenues from our national GST (or VAT) 10% consumption tax, plus state's get grants from the federal government and for special projects. City/county roads are paid for by resident rate-payers mostly, but they can apply to a pool of state or federal grant money as well. There are very few toll roads (loss making mostly), and car registration is reasonable. Trucking (as in articulated prime movers, not pickups) have more expensive registrations but certainly not paying for the road damage they do. Our nation is trying to get more freight onto rail by changing that cost-of-damage imbalance. Our roads are pretty good compared to what I've experienced in many countries and our system results in few arguments. We haven't solved the political pork problem however....yet.

  • Art Vandelay Dodge should bring this back. They could sell it as the classic classic classic model
  • Surferjoe Still have a 2013 RDX, naturally aspirated V6, just can't get behind a 4 banger turbo.Also gloriously absent, ESS, lane departure warnings, etc.
  • ToolGuy Is it a genuine Top Hand? Oh, I forgot, I don't care. 🙂
  • ToolGuy I did truck things with my truck this past week, twenty-odd miles from home (farther than usual). Recall that the interior bed space of my (modified) truck is 98" x 74". On the ride home yesterday the bed carried a 20 foot extension ladder (10 feet long, flagged 14 inches past the rear bumper), two other ladders, a smallish air compressor, a largish shop vac, three large bins, some materials, some scrap, and a slew of tool cases/bags. It was pretty full, is what I'm saying.The range of the Cybertruck would have been just fine. Nothing I carried had any substantial weight to it, in truck terms. The frunk would have been extremely useful (lock the tool cases there, out of the way of the Bed Stuff, away from prying eyes and grasping fingers -- you say I can charge my cordless tools there? bonus). Stainless steel plus no paint is a plus.Apparently the Cybertruck bed will be 78" long (but over 96" with the tailgate folded down) and 60-65" wide. And then Tesla promises "100 cubic feet of exterior, lockable storage — including the under-bed, frunk and sail pillars." Underbed storage requires the bed to be clear of other stuff, but bottom line everything would have fit, especially when we consider the second row of seats (tools and some materials out of the weather).Some days I was hauling mostly air on one leg of the trip. There were several store runs involved, some for 8-foot stock. One day I bummed a ride in a Roush Mustang. Three separate times other drivers tried to run into my truck (stainless steel panels, yes please). The fuel savings would be large enough for me to notice and to care.TL;DR: This truck would work for me, as a truck. Sample size = 1.
  • Ed That has to be a joke.