U.S. Commission: Raise Federal Gas Tax and Start Monitoring

John Horner
by John Horner

The recent historic drop in fuel consumption has translated into a $3b drop in taxes going into the Highway Trust Fund year-on-year. It’s a crisis! It’s a good thing that GW Bush signed into law the “ Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Ac t” back in August ’05. The Act empaneled the National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing Commission (NSTIFCT), and directed it to devise a new way to finance the Highway Trust Fund. Reuters has secured a draft copy of the commission’s final report. NSTIFCT’s recommending that Congress should raise U.S. gasoline taxes by 10 cents a gallon later this month, to “fix bridges and ease congested highways.” But that’s not all! “The gas tax is broken, so any increase in gas tax is just a Band-Aid,” commission member Adrian Moore said. “It gets you through a very short term. It doesn’t even remotely solve the problem.” Actually, the only thing broken about the federal gas tax is that it’s fixed at 18 cents per gallon. The tax hasn’t been adjusted for inflation– or any other factors– since it was last increased in 1993. But Mr. Moore doesn’t point out obvious fixes like indexing the federal gas tax to inflation, or otherwise periodically adjusting the tax based on the needs for highway spending. Anyway, Mr. Moore is down with pay-as-you go, we-know-where-you-are road pricing. Privacy concerns? No worry, Big Brother will not be a government agency, but a consortium of private road builders looking for a profit. Sort of like health insurance companies, only more intrusive. So which would you rather have, private toll roads and FasTrack monitoring everywhere, or gas taxes adjusted as needed to keep our highways in an adequate state of repair? Here’s hoping we get to make that choice.

John Horner
John Horner

More by John Horner

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 27 comments
  • MattPete MattPete on Jan 04, 2009

    I'm a fairly libertarian kinda guy, but the last thing we need to do is to privatize the roads. I'd happily pay an extra 50cents a gallon if that went to fund highway/road and other transportation projects. The infrastructure here in Northern Virginia is embarrassingly poor, if not outright crumbling.

  • PeteMoran PeteMoran on Jan 05, 2009

    How complex is road funding in the USA? I'm keen to know. In Australia we have three tiers; nationally important, state and then city/county roads. National roads get funding from our federally raised via a flat excise on fuel (which doesn't cover the costs) and income taxes. State roads are funded from state budgets with their revenues from our national GST (or VAT) 10% consumption tax, plus state's get grants from the federal government and for special projects. City/county roads are paid for by resident rate-payers mostly, but they can apply to a pool of state or federal grant money as well. There are very few toll roads (loss making mostly), and car registration is reasonable. Trucking (as in articulated prime movers, not pickups) have more expensive registrations but certainly not paying for the road damage they do. Our nation is trying to get more freight onto rail by changing that cost-of-damage imbalance. Our roads are pretty good compared to what I've experienced in many countries and our system results in few arguments. We haven't solved the political pork problem however....yet.

  • Funky D The problem is not exclusively the cost of the vehicle. The problem is that there are too few use cases for BEVs that couldn't be done by a plug-in hybrid, with the latter having the ability to do long-range trips without requiring lengthy recharging and being better able to function in really cold climates.In our particular case, a plug-in hybrid would run in all electric mode for the vast majority of the miles we would drive on a regular basis. It would also charge faster and the battery replacement should be less expensive than its BEV counterpart.So the answer for me is a polite, but firm NO.
  • 3SpeedAutomatic 2012 Ford Escape V6 FWD at 147k miles:Just went thru a heavy maintenance cycle: full brake job with rotors and drums, replace top & bottom radiator hoses, radiator flush, transmission flush, replace valve cover gaskets (still leaks oil, but not as bad as before), & fan belt. Also, #4 fuel injector locked up. About $4.5k spread over 19 months. Sole means of transportation, so don't mind spending the money for reliability. Was going to replace prior to the above maintenance cycle, but COVID screwed up the market ( $4k markup over sticker including $400 for nitrogen in the tires), so bit the bullet. Now serious about replacing, but waiting for used and/or new car prices to fall a bit more. Have my eye on a particular SUV. Last I checked, had a $2.5k discount with great interest rate (better than my CU) for financing. Will keep on driving Escape as long as A/C works. 🚗🚗🚗
  • Rna65689660 For such a flat surface, why not get smoke tint, Rtint or Rvynil. Starts at $8. I used to use a company called Lamin-x, but I think they are gone. Has held up great.
  • Cprescott A cheaper golf cart will not make me more inclined to screw up my life. I can go 500 plus miles on a tank of gas with my 2016 ICE car that is paid off. I get two weeks out of a tank that takes from start to finish less than 10 minutes to refill. At no point with golf cart technology as we know it can they match what my ICE vehicle can do. Hell no. Absolutely never.
  • Cprescott People do silly things to their cars.
Next