E85 Boondoggle Of The Day: Reborn In Obama?

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

In the last E85BOTD, Farago had the temerity to suggest that perhaps E85 and E10 are DOA. And we have surely come a long way from even nine months ago, when corn-based ethanol was still publicly accepted as an environmentally-friendly fuel for American energy independence. You know, a tortilla riot and media feeding frenzy ago. But mandates are still in place, and as the Chicago Tribune reports, the ethanol industry is awaiting the Obama inauguration with quivering anticipation. After all, Obama has long touted ethanol as a cornerstone of his energy independence plan, even pledging that all new cars would be flex-fuel by 2013. And a quick look at opensecrets.org (tsk, no ethanol breakouts) shows that a number of big names in biofuels gave heavily to Obama and the Democrats. Also, the recent announcement that Dr. Stephen Chu, Lisa Jackson, and Carol Browner will fill key energy and environmental roles in the Obama administration has the biofuel bizz cheering. Of course the all-flex-fuel-by-2013 pledge was qualified with a hearty “if elected,” and these things have a habit of changing. Just ask the UAW.

According to Sanjay Shrestha, an alternative-energy analyst for Lazard Capital, Obama’s victory was an “incremental positive” for ethanol, but he says “we shouldn’t draw the conclusion that it’s going to revitalize the corn-based ethanol industry.” After all, “If you just give them more money, it’s just going to make the price of corn higher, which is going to make the situation worse for them,” says Tom Elam, of FarmEcon. “As a result of their unbridled enthusiasm, they have built an industry bigger than the government mandate and the ability of corn growers to provide.”

And though his midwest roots meant his campaign rhetorically supported ethanol, the high prices, reduced mileage, environmental damage, corn market disruption and endless other downsides could see Obama reneging on old loyalties. More likely than seeing a flex-fuel-based policy, Obama will direct money towards research on cellulosic biofuels. Meanwhile, in the dark and cold of the open market, corn ethanol refineries are shutting down, plans for new ones are being canceled and firms are going bankrupt.

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 13 comments
  • David C. Holzman David C. Holzman on Dec 12, 2008

    Menno already made the point I would have made in response to Chuck's biodiesel, that if it became popular, they'd run out of waste and start growing crops. That, in turn, would cause more carbon emissions than it would save for anywhere from about 30-400 years, depending on the land where it was produced. Richard1's suggestion not to let locals know is also on point. Anyone who wants the big picture on biofuels in detail should read my article at www.ehponline.org/members/2008/116-6/focus.html

  • Jonnyguitar Jonnyguitar on Dec 12, 2008

    The image is hysterical. Even if you guys still aren't taking your own shots, you're looking pretty hard. For a smart guy, Obama is clearly off on auto/transportation issues. Likely strategic to get votes in corn producing/auto producing states.

  • Ige65815723 Oh, lookie, another EV fanatic disconnected from reality.The "reality" being the low fruit has been picked by Tesla. The market has little desire for EVs at 2X/3x the price of ICE and zero desire for EV trucks. To quote Fords CEO, sub $20k Chinese EVs are an "extinction level event" for the Big3.
  • 28-Cars-Later "“It’s a very serious offense,” Friedlander said. “It’s not a parking ticket, let’s put it that way.""Well if it doesn't involve jail time, what's the difference?
  • Syke Seriously looking at one for next spring (and I've pointedly NEVER owned a full-sized pickup). Pity I'll be trading in a Bolt.
  • Cprescott The truck was a deal when first launched. It is not a deal now and appears to be only good to be an urban cowboymobile instead of a serious truck based on range issues.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X It is a money losing venture. Like a country that is $35 trillion in debt and still able to give away tens of billions of dollars when asked.
Next