Bailout Watch 232: CS First Boston on FoMoCo Plan: "Not Much Here"

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

“There is very little in the way of new initiatives/efforts/changes to improve the cost structure or profitability of the company, in our view. Most of the document submitted to the Congress is an outline of the company’s existing ‘Plan’ and actions that either have already been taken or are slated to play out over the next couple of years (especially as it relates to new product development). Ford is now calling for its existing plan to deliver profitability of at or above breakeven by 2011 at both the corporate level and in North America. On a cash flow basis, the plan is to be breakeven or above on a Corporate basis by 2011 (no mention of North American cash flow). Ford’s base case US sales assumption for 2011 is 15.5 million total vehicle sales. Following are some things that we think are lacking in the plan:

1. A more aggressive plan to significantly and quickly shrink the dealer network.

2. Any concrete, further reductions to hourly wages, benefits, work rules – and especially the JOBS bank. Ford said that it is “presently engaged in discussions with the UAW with the objective to further reduce our cost structure and eliminate the remaining labor cost gap that exists between Ford and the transplants.” The company asked the incoming Congress and the Obama Administration to “establish a process to address in a comprehensive way the conditions that inhibit competitiveness of the domestic industry”, including, “creditors, dealers, the UAW, and suppliers.”

3. Any further near term balance sheet restructuring. Because Ford has significant liquidity, the company is in a more flexible position than GM, and therefore is able to submit a plan with less draconian actions to stem the significant cash burn it is experiencing at current volume levels. Indeed, the document submitted to Congress does not seem to acknowledge the profound rate of cash burn that Ford is currently dealing with.”

[thanks to you-know-who-you-are]


Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 4 comments
  • Crackers Crackers on Dec 03, 2008
    "Ford’s base case US sales assumption for 2011 is 15.5 million total vehicle sales" They are far too optimistic and should be planning for no more than 12 million with contingencies for +/- 1 million.
  • Skor Skor on Dec 03, 2008

    Since I didn't see John Cleese or Eric Idle, I believe those really are classic Ford commercials (adverts?).

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh Market saturation .. nothing more
  • Lou_BC I've been considering a 2nd set of tires and wheels. I got stuck in some gooie mud that turned my Duratrac's to slicks. I personally would stick to known brands and avoid Chinesium knock-offs.
  • Carson D How do you maximize profits when you lost $60K on every vehicle you produce? I guess not producing any more vehicles would be a start.
  • Carguy949 You point out that Rivian and Tesla lack hybrids to “bring home the bacon”, but I would clarify that Tesla currently makes a profit while Rivian doesn’t.
  • Cprescott I'm sure this won't matter to the millions of deceived Honduh owners who think the company that once prided itself on quality has somehow slipped in the real world. Same for Toyoduhs. Resting on our Laurel's - Oh, what a feeling!
Next