GM Tries to Sell Investors on Chrysler Merger "Synergy"

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

C’mon now, don’t laugh. As The Wall Street Journal points out, this GM – Chrysler deal is some serious shit for people who live and work in and around Detroit. “Analysts estimate more than half of Chrysler’s 66,000 employees would lose their jobs in a merger,” the Journal reports. “Thousands more would be affected at GM and at suppliers and service companies that rely on work with Chrysler.” In a related story, helpfully titled “What If the U.S. Auto Makers Don’t Survive?”, the Journal’s Heidi N. Moore asks “How close are we to an ‘ Omega Man‘ scenario? Lache, who expects that in the event of a serious cash crunch ‘sales among the Big Three will decline virtually overnight,’ provides a nice overview of what would happen to the Big Three-dependent businesses: auto-parts suppliers and retailers including American Axle, Autoliv, BorgWarner, Johnson Controls, Lear, Asbury and AutoNation.” I’ll sum-it up for you: nothing good. And in yet another related story ( in fact the one I set out to blog oh so many control Cs ago), we learn how GM’s pitching the Chrysler hookup in this, the worst all possible times to pitch a major merger…

“In recent days GM, its lenders, and Chrysler owner Cerberus Capital Management, have been trying to woo investors with a pitch about the transaction. That pitch touts a combined GM-Chrysler as delivering cost savings of up to $10 billion, an immediate boost in revenue and an increase in cash available to the merged firm… Those cuts could total as much as 40,000 jobs if a deal comes together, said people briefed on the talks.” Yes, the proverbial person “involved in the deal” maintains that “There is simply the savings that comes with both companies not trying anymore to be all things to all people. There are lots of meaningful cost rationalizations.” OK, now you can laugh. But only sardonically.

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 17 comments
  • Conslaw Conslaw on Oct 21, 2008

    The odds of there actually being $11 billion in the bank after GM & Chrysler merge are about 11 billion to one. If Chrysler really had $11 billion in the bank, why would they be negotiating to be acquired by General Motors, a company with a market cap (total market value) of $3 billion. Plus GM is losing at least $1 billion per month? At best, Chrysler's real non-committed cash is in the $3-5 billion range, and the only reason Chrysler has money is that they have cut back on R&D. Chrysler has virtually nothing in the pipeline to replace the models that are already selling 33% less than they did last year. Let's say Chrysler has 3 billion in cash to devote to the deal. For Chrysler to lay off 30,000 redundant employees and give them the typical $100,000 per employee buyout package, it would take $3,000,000,000 in cash.

  • Geotpf Geotpf on Oct 21, 2008

    Conslaw-That's a good point. If Chrysler really has 11 billion in cash just lying around, and they really want to merge with GM, why don't they just buy up all of GM's stock (at a cost of 3 billion)? Then, they could sell the rest of GMAC to Cerberus itself (selling GMAC to itself, in effect, but taking all of GMAC out of GM-Chrysler and into Cerberus's head office), and then Cerberus could spin off the GM-Chrysler combo (such stock would have to be worth at least the 3 billion they paid for GM initially). This would result in exactly the same result as what appears to be proposed. They don't do this because there is no 11 billion.

  • Bill Wade I think about my dealer who was clueless about uConnect updates and still can't fix station presets disappearing and the manufacturers want me to trust them and their dealers to address any self driving concerns when they can't fix a simple radio?Right.
  • FreedMike I don't think they work very well, so yeah...I'm afraid of them.
  • ChristianWimmer I have two problems with autonomous cars.One, I LOVE and ENJOY DRIVING. It’s a fun and pleasurable experience for me. I want to drive my cars, not be driven by them.Two, if autonomous cars have been engineered to a standard where they work 100% flawlessly and don’t cause accidents, then freedom-hating governments like the POS European Union or totally idiotic current German government can literally make laws which ban private car ownership in their quest to save the world from climate change bla bla bla…
  • SCE to AUX Everything in me says 'no', but the price is tempting, and it's only 2 hours from me.I guess 123k miles in 18 years does qualify as 'low miles'.
  • Dwford Will we ever actually have autonomous vehicles? Right now we have limited consumer grade systems that require constant human attention, or we have commercial grade systems that still rely on remote operators and teams of chase vehicles. Aside from Tesla's FSD, all these systems work only in certain cities or highway routes. A common problem still remains: the system's ability to see and react correctly to obstacles. Until that is solved, count me out. Yes, I could also react incorrectly, but at least the is me taking my fate into my own hands, instead of me screaming in terror as the autonomous vehicles rams me into a parked semi
Next