GM Board of Directors on Chrysler Hook-Up: Are You Nuts?

John Horner
by John Horner

According to [yet more] unnamed sources for The Wall Street Journal, General Motors’ Board of Bystanders put the kibosh on a Chrysler merger deal. “Despite huge losses over the past four years, a plunge in GM’s stock price and growing worries about whether the auto maker has enough cash to turn itself around, GM’s board has continued to support Chairman and Chief Executive Rick Wagoner.” Nice set-up. “But the board’s cautious reaction to the proposed merger suggests it may assert itself more than in the past if Mr. Wagoner and his team try to move ahead with a Chrysler deal.” You would think that in times like this the board would be asserting its authority in, I dunno, setting the strategic direction for the company, rather than, say, simply reacting to the latest thoughts of the CEO whose wiped tens of billions off the company’s worth and plunged it into a terminal nosedive. But then again, reacting instead of leading is the GM way from top to bottom. Anyway, as that’s that, let’s hear what AutoNation’s CEO Michael “No Not That One” Jackson has to say about all this meshugas. Jump!

When it comes to the 2.8’s overall position in the marketplace, Michael Jackson said GM, Ford and Chrysler are “not going to dominate in the U.S. and elsewhere in the world as they have in the past, and they’ll have to find a piece of the pie where they can be successful and profitable.” In other words, Detroit’s former lions are all shrinking and the game of musical chairs continues. But as you made the jump, and probably already knew that, how about this, buried at the bottom. “In an effort to boost Ford’s liquidity, its board has approved the sale of at least part of Ford’s controlling stake in Mazda Motor Co., according to several people briefed on the matter [unnamed sources rule!]. “Selling some of it 33.4 per cent stake in Mazda is viewed as an attractive option for Ford because unlike some assets, the stake wasn’t used as collateral when the auto maker secured $US24 billion in financing two years ago.” Huh.

John Horner
John Horner

More by John Horner

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 24 comments
  • Denial Denial on Oct 13, 2008

    Is it not possible that GM would want to merge with Chrysler in order to create the single biggest dysfunctional, debt-ridden entity in the history of human civilization, thereby scraping open a hole in the fabric of space/time and in so doing releasing, into this dimension, a species of interstellar life forms who, by no accident, are able to survive only within, say, a G5 or this lovely Sebring that, you know, another couple were just looking at today...I think they've gone to the bank in fact...

  • Mgme Mgme on Oct 28, 2008

    When Gm stock hit 5 bucks a share I bought 1000 shares. This was less then 2 weeks ago. My thought was it was a good buy. Now this borrowing money to buy a loosing Chrysler has me concerned. Lou Dobbs doesn't like it either. He states the bail out merger is like paying GM to cut Jobs.

  • MaintenanceCosts I wish more vehicles in our market would be at or under 70" wide. Narrowness makes everything easier in the city.
  • El scotto They should be supping with a very, very long spoon.
  • El scotto [list=1][*]Please make an EV that's not butt-ugly. Not Jaguar gorgeous but Buick handsome will do.[/*][*] For all the golf cart dudes: A Tesla S in Plaid mode will be the fastest ride you'll ever take.[/*][*]We have actual EV owners posting on here. Just calmly stated facts and real world experience. This always seems to bring out those who would argue math.[/*][/list=1]For some people an EV will never do, too far out in the country, taking trips where an EV will need recharged, etc. If you own a home and can charge overnight an EV makes perfect sense. You're refueling while you're sleeping.My condo association is allowing owners to install chargers. You have to pay all of the owners of the parking spaces the new electric service will cross. Suggested fee is 100$ and the one getting a charger pays all the legal and filing fees. I held out for a bottle of 30 year old single malt.Perhaps high end apartments will feature reserved parking spaces with chargers in the future. Until then non home owners are relying on public charge and one of my neighbors is in IT and he charges at work. It's call a perk.I don't see company owned delivery vehicles that are EV's. The USPS and the smiley boxes should be the 1st to do this. Nor are any of our mega car dealerships doing this and but of course advertising this fact.I think a great many of the EV haters haven't came to the self-actualization that no one really cares what you drive. I can respect and appreciate what you drive but if I was pushed to answer, no I really don't care what you drive. Before everyone goes into umbrage over my last sentence, I still like cars. Especially yours.I have heated tiles in my bathroom and my kitchen. The two places you're most likely to be barefoot. An EV may fall into to the one less thing to mess with for many people.Macallan for those who were wondering.
  • EBFlex The way things look in the next 5-10 years no. There are no breakthroughs in battery technology coming, the charging infrastructure is essentially nonexistent, and the price of entry is still way too high.As soon as an EV can meet the bar set by ICE in range, refueling times, and price it will take off.
  • Jalop1991 Way to bury the lead. "Toyota to offer two EVs in the states"!
Next