By on October 20, 2008

No major surprises here, as ChryCo’s AWD option box is ticked on fewer than five percent of Caliber purchases and even less often on Avengbrings. “For the Avenger, the take rate was 1.5% for 2008, and for the Sebring it was at 0.7%.” Chrysler spokesman Jiyan Cadiz tells Ward’sAuto. “So obviously the bottom line is people want fuel economy, and the AWD modules are not profitable for us. That’s something we can get rid of as we’re consolidating products and finding what’s profitable.” And while we wish Chrysler the best of luck in their hunt for “what’s profitable,” AWD supplier BorgWarner has a case of sour grapes for Chrysler. “What we’re seeing in terms of market forecasting is that (AWD) in the B-, C- and D-segments is growing globally,” say BorgWarner’s product business director, Chris Cook, who calls Chrysler’s move an “aberration.” And Cook blames Chrysler’s Jim Press, lately of ToMoCo. “Press comes from Toyota (Motor Corp.), where they don’t have AWD on a lot of vehicles (in those segments),” Cook says. “So (the decision) was philosophical.” Or rational. Anyone who wants an AWD Caliber can always spring for a Jeep Compass, and AWD has always been an under-advertised afterthought on the Sebring and Avenger. In fact, Press’s Toyota roots don’t make him “anti-AWD.” Toyota’s partial ownership of Subaru proves that a dedicated AWD-peddling niche brand (hello, Jeep) allows the mainstream brand to focus on efficiency and affordability. And with CAFE bumps looming, offering AWD on every model “because you can” makes less and less sense every day.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

15 Comments on “Chrysler Dropping AWD From Sebring, Avenger And Caliber...”


  • avatar
    psarhjinian

    There was an AWD Sebring? Really?

    (goes and looks)

    Well, I’ll be damned…

    I’ve seen more than a few Calibers with that option box checked, but nary a single AWD Sebring. And this is Canada, where Chrysler actually sells very well.

    Any stats on the Fusion’s sales? I’ve seen a fair percentage of those with AWD badges on the rear.

  • avatar
    Point Given

    AWD is huge for our winters up here. A shame it’s lost on the Caliber. Was one of the only redeeming features on it.

  • avatar
    Bancho

    Didn’t the top model Caliber come with AWD standard or am I mistaken?

  • avatar
    Point Given

    Up here it only came as an option on the R/T model.

  • avatar
    Albnyc

    Rationality from a US automaker? I’m shocked, shocked.

  • avatar
    Casual Observer

    If you want someone to buy it, you need to give it a cool name a la 4motion, quattro, 4matic.

  • avatar
    John Horner

    Chrysler did something smart, wow. I wonder how all those Nordic folks have been making due with few AWD vehicles for all these years?

    A well balanced front or rear wheel drive car with a limited slip differential and good winter tires on all four corners is well suited to tackling the vast majority of inclement weather conditions. I wonder how many people buy AWD vehicles to avoid the hassle of changing tires over by the season?

  • avatar
    Michael Ayoub

    Haha.

    I had no idea AWD was even an option on those cars.

  • avatar
    psarhjinian

    If you want someone to buy it, you need to give it a cool name a la 4motion, quattro, 4matic.

    Or let people know that it exists.

  • avatar
    Albnyc

    Or let people know that it exists.

    Nah, that costs money!

  • avatar
    JuniorMint

    Point Given :
    A shame [AWD is] lost on the Caliber. Was one of the only redeeming features on it.

    Still, there’s not much point in having AWD if the car drops its transmission after five years, huh? :)

  • avatar
    willbodine

    Roger that, Michael Ayoub. I vaguely remember the awd for the Caliber, but as an option for Avenger/Sebring, that’s news to moi. Yesterday’s news.

  • avatar
    Areitu

    They cancelled a car I didn’t know existed!

  • avatar
    Wolven

    Based on the low “take rates”, apparently the buying public are brighter than the automakers thought… i.e. Why should you add a bunch of weight and complexity to swap around which SINGLE wheel is driving the car? That’s just stupid.

  • avatar
    Gary Read

    Very wrong Wolven. I have an AWD Caliber and it is the most sure footed AWD or 4WD vehicle I have ever driven. It became especially clear to me after heavy rains iced over roads last year. I was climbing grades effortlessly with no indication of wheel slippage while FWD and 4WD vehicles were unable to climb the same grades with multiple tries and pushing their luck on speedy approaches. I agree with other writers – AWD was shamefully under advertised. For someone who is in to outdoor sports but doesn’t care for gas guzzling SUVs the AWD Caliber hits the sweet spot in balancing between economy, capacity, and capability. I get 23mpg in town and 27+mpg on hiway trips. Mountain bike fits inside with the wheels on. The Caliber is not an off road vehicle but the AWD Caliber gets me effortlessly over any sorry excuse for a road in ANY weather conditions. I have a unique gem and will keep it until teleportation becomes feasible!

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • ttacgreg: I remember getting home and out of rush-hour freeway traffic in Denver in the 60s and my clothes reeked of...
  • ttacgreg: Try to attempt some constitutional legalisms to justify your position that states can’t set their own...
  • SoCalMikester: funny, because rivian isnt going to be able to meet amazons demand. theyll take your money no prob.
  • ajla: “Anything else I missed?” Apparently how laws work. And, how to not give the most knee-jerk...
  • SoCalMikester: its still more than what F paid, so wheres the loss?

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber