Oil Prices

William C Montgomery
by William C Montgomery
oil prices

Halleluiah! Oil prices are falling. Despite Nigerian revolutionaries attacking Royal Dutch Shell facilities. Despite hurricanes Gustav and Ike disrupting gulf production. And despite all of the hysteria of the last six months trumpeting the end of the era of cheap oil, oil prices have fallen as much as $55 per barrel after being pushed to a peak of $147.27 in July. Once the residual shock to gasoline refining by Ike dissipates over the next couple of weeks, consumers will begin to see a substantial difference at the pump. So is it safe for Americans to recommission their mothballed SUVs and muscle cars? A close look at financial events in recent days indicates otherwise.

First, let’s recap what we’ve seen.

Beginning in 2004 the price of Light Sweet Crude on NYMEX began an almost uninterrupted ascent that added more than $100 to the price of every barrel. A circus ensued. Consumers swooned (precipitously). Automakers faltered (dangerously). Speculators hyped (aggressively). News media sensationalized (despicably). Inflation grew (corrosively). Environmentalists cheered (quietly). Politicians protested (hypocritically). Oil company execs defended (piously). Saudi’s pumped (merrily). Oil peaked (allegedly). Demand evaporated (predictably). Prices fell.

A more revealing analysis shows that the surge in prices was the result of two seldom mentioned factors: a weakening dollar that required that Americans spend more of them to get their fix of black gold. And index fund managers discovered that the commodities market was a good place to shelter their money from falling real estate and stock markets. In May, BusinessWeek summed the market distortion this way:

“[Commodities] are experiencing demand shock from a new category of speculators: institutional investors like corporate and government pension funds, university endowments, and sovereign wealth funds,” said Michael Masters, managing member of Masters Capital Management, a Virgin Islands-based hedge fund.“Index speculators are the primary cause of the recent price spikes in commodities.

Speculative activity in commodity markets has grown dramatically over the last several years. In the past decade, the share of long interests – positions that benefit when prices rise – held by financial speculators has grown from one-quarter to two-thirds of the commodity market. In only five years, from 2003 to 2008, investment in index funds tied to commodities has grown twentyfold, from $13 billion to $260 billion.

Additionally, hedge fund director Masters points to data showing that over a five-year period, China’s demand for oil has increased by 920 million barrels, while over the same period, index speculators’ demand has increased by 848 million barrels.”

Whew! So it is safe to say that if you are invested in any of these index funds or if you are due a pension, you likely benefited from the higher commodity prices at the same time you are paying higher prices at the pump.

Since that time, we have seen the market peak followed by a rapid deflation in prices. While it can be argued that demand destruction accounts for some of the effect, it alone cannot approach the 37% fall in price. Rather, the dollar has strengthened (erratically) and investors have stampeded out of the notoriously risky commodities market.

This is good news, right? The bubble, which energy economist Edward Morse calls it the “Oil Dot-com,” has burst. Now consumer prices can be restored to normal supply and demand price points. Yes, but… (There’s always a big but and I cannot lie.)

Monday morning financial markets were ambushed by the announcement that troubled investment bank Lehman Brothers, a 158-year old fixture on Wall Street, has folded. The big B-K. Horrified, the Dow Jones industrials plummeted more than 500 points, the worst day of trading since terrorists slammed hijacked airliners into the World Trade Center.

What of oil futures? Based on recent history one would think that fleeing investors would seek refuge for their money back in the commodities market. Didn’t happen. Instead it followed the trend of the broader market. The inverse relationship between the markets appears to have broken. Which is a good thing – I would rather index fund managers look elsewhere when stocks falter so energy prices that directly impact my pocketbook don’t become unnaturally inflated.

But this is a dire indicator. Rather than the correction of an over-inflated price (I still believe that oil is overpriced and has room to fall further before it achieves an undistorted equilibrium price), this week’s decline shows that investors well and truly have lost faith in the economy. Rather than divert their funds to alternate investments they sold off for cash or stayed pat and suffered a loss in equity.

In other words, factories will idle, business will stop growing, and the transport of goods will slow because no one is buying. All of this points towards corporate downsizing and layoffs.

B&B, be advised: keep your gas guzzlers parked. It’s going to get worse before things start to get better.

Join the conversation
2 of 106 comments
  • Tankd0g Tankd0g on Sep 27, 2008

    PCH101: Oil companies didn't accept anything, they were not in a position control the price in the 1990s. The 1990s are the darkest time in history as far as oil companies are concerned, they saw their profits strangled by Clinton era oversight that kept them from doing what they are doing now. I'm not going to say it again, the consolidated their monopoly AFTER Bush took office. AFTER he removed price controls, AFTER he told the FTC to stop looking at them. http://www.wtrg.com/oil_graphs/oilprice1970.gif You don't find that graph the least bit fishy?

  • Tankd0g Tankd0g on Sep 27, 2008

    Pch101: By the way, the $150/barrel price that traders loved, well only traders who bought in when it was low loved that. It does nobody any good if the price is stable. It will be $150 again soon, you can bet on it, and it will be the oil companies themselves that trigger it, NOT the traders.

  • 3SpeedAutomatic And this too shall pass.....Ford went thru this when the model T was introduced. It took the moving assembly line to make real money. As time progressed, it got refined, eventually moving to the Model A. Same kind of hiccups with fuel injection, 4 speed automatic, Firestone tires, dashboards with no radio knobs, etc, etc, etc. Same thing with EVs. Yep, a fire or two in the parking lot, espresso time at the charging stations, other issues yet to be encountered, just give it time. 🚗🚗🚗
  • Art Vandelay 2025 Camaro and Challenger
  • Mike Beranek Any car whose engine makes less than 300 ft-lbs of torque.
  • Malcolm Mini temporarily halted manual transmission production but brought it back as it was a surprisingly good seller. The downside is that they should have made awd standard with the manual instead of nixing it. Ford said recently that 4dr were 7% manual take rate and I think the two door was 15%.
  • Master Baiter It’s hard to make predictions, especially about the future. It will be interesting to see if demand for Ford’s EVs will match the production capacity they are putting on line.