2 Views
Car and Driver Endorses McCain. More or Less.
by
Robert Farago
(IC: employee)
Published: August 8th, 2008
Share
{
"id": "9494172",
"alt": "",
"title": "",
"video_link": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/nw60RIrFXJs",
"youtube_video_id": "nw60RIrFXJs"
}
{
"width": 634,
"height": 357,
"showRelated": true
}
Robert Farago
More by Robert Farago
Published August 8th, 2008 11:17 PM
Comments
Join the conversation
psarhjinian: I'm not attempting to open a second debate (seriously- I have a meeting in seven and a half hours and I've already spent too much time on this); I would simply like to explain where my views come from (you state that you do not understand the apparent dissonance in those that support a robust military and limited healthcare spending). I support having a strong military (certainly we have undertaken several actions of questionable merit- I mean only that I support in general having a strong national defense). I do not support government run/funded healthcare. This stems from my belief in a government limited to the powers enumerated in the US Constitution. The Constitution explicitly calls for common defense through a Navy and Army. The obvious counterargument is to speak of the provision whereby the government is to provide for the general welfare of the United States (a source of legitimate debate). Again, I post this not to debate, but to explain how I (and possibly others) hold beliefs that you found inexplicable.
It is actually simple. We need a smaller government and less regulation. Like the Constitution intended.
I think what is important is that most people are upset about paying $4/gallon and wish they were still paying $2. I'm sure Obama wasn't trying to say that inflating your tires will solve $4/gal gas, but to point out the absurdity that drilling will. Furthermore proper tire inflation helps your pocket book a 4% (3% Alaska + 1% coastal) increase in US oil production increases the global oil supply 1%, with uncertain consequences on price.