2008 Mustang Bullitt Review: Take Two

Jonny Lieberman
by Jonny Lieberman

I've driven a lot of new Mustangs. Specifically, the V6 Convertible, GT, GT Convertible, GT California Special, Hertz GT-H, Shelby GT and the Shelby GT500 (coupe and convertible). The only ones I've missed are the V6 hard top (I'll pass) and the Shelby GT500KR. After last week, I can check the 2008 Bullitt Mustang off my pony car to-do list. Limited to "just" 7700 examples, the Bullitt follows the path laid down by its cinematic inspiration: green paint, black wheels, limited badging and more power. As a veteran ‘Stang wrangler, let me tell you how the latest iteration stacks up against the other stallions…

The fundamental theorem of all modern Mustangs: Somewhere, on some road, at some point in time, you will understand why V8 gumption mated to a rear wheel-drive chassis is a winning formula. In other words, they're supposed to be throwbacks.

In a run-of-the-mill Mustang GT, you may only get that rebel without a cause feeling on a big straight highway when you downshift and drop hammer for the Hell of it. In the GT Convertible, the car’s only evocative when you're driving next to an ocean. In the psychotic highly-tuned GT500, ‘Stangstacy only arrives when you crack 4,000 rpm and the supercharger whines louder than a newborn with dysentery. In the rare GT-H Rent-a-Racer (solely slushbox), you only achieve that special sensation when others are gawking and pointing. Alone in the desert? Snore.

But the Bullitt Mustang gets it right everywhere, all the time. You feel lucky and invincible while putting around town, devouring a freeway, whipping through corners or just standing still.

Case in point: I let a pal-o-mine drive the Bullitt (he begged) back from a night out in Hollywood. We were on Sunset, barely cracking 40 mph and he couldn't shut up. "Dude, this feels awesome!" Then we turned north into the hills and he gunned it. "Oh man, oh man, oh man! I love this car!" My friend was Frank Bullitt for perhaps fifteen minutes. I, on the hand, had the pleasure of running up more than 700 miles of burbling V8 seat time. And I never felt any different.

There are only two downsides. One is fuel economy. Driving to and from San Diego, I never went below 80 mph (or above 110 mph). The Bullitt returned an honest 25 mpg. When my week was over, I had averaged 17.6 mpg. Not counting the free tank my tester came with, I spent $171.10 on 87 octane gas. And I returned it on fumes. The other negative is (of course) the Bullitt’s interior.

Ford knows better than us that their car interiors suck. But there is mounting evidence, however tenuous, that FoMoCo is moving beyond acceptance to transformation. A few minutes spent in the new Ford Flex CUV are all Mustang fans need to light the candle of hope. The new 2010 Mustang will be a nice place to sit. The 2008 Mustangs, however, just aren’t.

Returning to my friend's off the cuff comments: "Why would they do this?" He was rapping his fingers against the hard, horrible dash cover. "Why not raise the price a little and make the inside as cool as the outside?" Birds chirping.

Let me give you another example of the bad and ugly. There's a button next to the cupholder that has a picture of a shoe on a pedal with a light shining on top of it. For four days I kept pressing it and looking at my feet, waiting for some sign of illumination. Nada. Then one day my girlfriend pressed it and noticed that the ring of light around the cupholder changed colors. Parts binnage at it's very, very worst.

Luckily, the Bullitt’s exterior is so spot-on that only us auto scribes would bother bitching about the interior. The Bullitt is nearly debadged. Only the wheel centers have the Mustang pony logo and with the exception of the lone "Ford Bullitt" badge on the trunk, there's no other indication. I especially dig the front, which is less fussy than the V6. Talk about stealth. If you're a fan of the Mustang's shape, then the Bullitt is the ideal form.

In fact, the Bullitt is what the GT should have been from day one. The sounds it makes are intoxicating. Them modest 15 hp and five lb-ft power bumps (315 hp, 325 torques) feel massively underrated. Thank the 3.73:1 final drive ratio and heightened redline.

But honestly, you can throw your numbers out the window. Who cares if an STI can stop shorter or that a 335i has sharper steering? Not I, and certainly not a Bullitt owner. Ford has crafted a very special Mustang that feels fantastic, mile after thundering mile.

[Ford provided the vehicle reviewed, insurance and a tank of gas.]

Jonny Lieberman
Jonny Lieberman

Cleanup driver for Team Black Metal V8olvo.

More by Jonny Lieberman

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 50 comments
  • Seano32b Seano32b on Nov 24, 2008

    jstnspin82, No, you're correct, most younger drivers don't know about the film, Bullitt, and I couldn't care less. I know and appreciate the history of the film and the history behind the car. By, the way, I am a member of the, "older generation," and I don't give a rip about gas prices. I born and raised in Detroit, grew up around muscle cars, and decided to buy one that has a sizable collectors value and a meaning to me. Thanks for your concern over my mental state of mind be behind my recent purchase, but you can save it for someone who cares.

  • Hayward Hayward on Aug 21, 2013

    2008 Mustang Bullitt: 1. Quality and legacy will eventually matter to younger auto enthusiasts 2. You can get much better fuel mileage 30 average depending on how you drive and simple mods (easily reversible) that will not hurt the value of this potentially valuable model. 3. This car is "retro", do you want a modern European interior in this car, or more authentic? 4. this car will handle and accelerate comparably with any other car BMW/Subaru/etc in or above its class except a "supercar", easy to modify/reverse 5. this car may be very collectible

  • Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
  • B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
  • Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
  • Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
  • FreedMike If Dodge were smart - and I don't think they are - they'd spend their money refreshing and reworking the Durango (which I think is entering model year 3,221), versus going down the same "stuff 'em full of motor and give 'em cool new paint options" path. That's the approach they used with the Charger and Challenger, and both those models are dead. The Durango is still a strong product in a strong market; why not keep it fresher?
Next