Saturn Aura XE Review

Megan Benoit
by Megan Benoit
saturn aura xe review

You gotta admire the chutzpah of an automaker that asks buyers to “rethink American” by pitting a German derived sedan against’s third “most American” automobile (Toyota Camry) and a sedan with 70 percent domestic content (Honda Accord). Although Saturn’s ads invites interested parties to a side-by-side-by-side comparison of all three “domestics”, like many intenders, I didn’t have time. So I decided to test the Saturn Aura XE and call it good. You know, if it was.

The Aura XE is certainly easy on the eyes, though you need the alloy wheel package to make its stand out from the Camcord. Given Saturn’s usual pug-fugly fare, the anodyne Aura is, relatively speaking, supermodel swank. Those Pokemon-adorable eyes, that misaligned chrome door trim… wait, what? Saturn is definitely raising its game, but I’d fire whoever did QA on the Monet-style exterior trim (it’s great from a distance, but don’t look too close).

Once inside, it’s immediately clear the look and feel of the Aura’s plastics won’t keep VW haptic hit squad up at night, but they’re definitely a cut above standard GM fare. As is the surprisingly hefty steering wheel and the sensible, ergonomically sound gauges and controls. The XE’s faux wood trim is cringe-worthy and the cloth seats seem carefully crafted to encourage a leather upgrade. Still, taken as a whole, the Aura’s cabin matches the transplants’ ability to raise unobjectionality to the next level (invisibility?).

The Aura driver can play with a large number of convenience options– eight-way adjustable power seat, tilt and telescopic steering wheel. Back seat passengers get plenty of room, but nary a floor vent or armrest to relieve the monotony.

Fire-up the Aura XE and the salesman fills your right ear with idle gossip. For less than a base Camcord, Saturn gives you a V6! Yes, well, the XE holsters a 224hp 3.5-liter six-pot mated to four-speed transmission. The base Camry and Accord may only have in-line fours, but they're damn good I4’s (158hp and 166hp respectively) connected to five-speed boxes that don’t hunt for gears like a pig looking for truffles in a French department store.

A few minutes on the road brings this fundamental deficiency to light; anytime you attempt to induce a downshift by mashing the throttle the pushrod V6 proves as responsive as David Hasselhoff on a drinking binge (and about as much fun). At least when the Aura XE’s tranny eventually decides to shift, it does so without appreciable lag.

The Aura’s engine whines increases with the rpm count, but there’s little of the finesse offered by its Japanese competition. As long as you don’t plan on any last-minute overtaking maneuvers or merging via short on-ramps, the Aura XE’s progress is pleasant enough.

Until you try to stop. The Aura’s brake pedal is stiffer than Detroit’s opposition to updated CAFE regulations and retard the car’s forward motion at roughly the same rate regardless of pedal pressure. It’s an entirely disconcerting binary proposition. The salesman was most enthusiastic about the Aura's standard electronic brakeforce distribution (EBD), but on a practical level, deacceleration was indistinguishable from standard fare.

Through the twisty bits, the Aura's front struts and independent rear suspension maintain their composure with admirable aplomb. The four-door feels solid and surprisingly toss-able, with no more body roll than many sport sedans. The steering meets the Goldilocks’ standard: responsive without being too heavy or too light. This excellent handling screams out for a decent transmission (please Sir, can I have a manual?).

I shudder to think what would happen to the Aura’s gas mileage with a more responsive throttle. The Aura XE may have lots more poke than the base Camry and Accord, but its EPA fuel economy clocks in at 20/30mpg. I’m thinking great landing, wrong airport. Anyone shopping for a sedan at this price point will probably consider the Camry (24/33) and Accord’s (24/34) fuel economy figures more important than their accelerative abilities.

After driving the Aura XE, I came away with new respect for the Saturn brand. If they’d somehow managed to offer the larger engined, six-speed Aura XR at the same price as the XE, they would have bested two of the most highly developed mid-size cars in the world, built by longstanding market leaders. But they didn’t.

What’s more, the new Accord’s coming out this fall, Honda’s clean diesels are on their way and Toyota isn’t exactly known for standing still on the automotive development front. And then there’s the automotive elephant in the room: the 234hp, five-speed Sonata. For a grand more, Hyundai gives you stability control, automatic climate control, alloy wheels and “America’s Best Warranty.”

While you’ve got to hand it to Saturn for building a credible contender in the most deadly automotive sector, it’s what they do next that will ultimately determine the model’s success or failure.

Join the conversation
2 of 82 comments
  • Njnikusha Njnikusha on Nov 20, 2008

    well better than pontiac i guess

  • Ponchoman49 Ponchoman49 on Jan 07, 2009

    The Saturn Aura is hands down a better car than the rental car base bland Camry with it's wheezing 4 cylinder and hesitating 5 speed automatic tranny that almost everyone in car forums has complained about and very noticeable on 3 out of 4 Camrys I have tested. The 3500 V6 which is the same setup in my 2007 Malibu is a rock solid powertrain and I would never in a million years trade it for a Camry or Accord 4 banger. And for those worried about mileage, the 3500/4 speed automatic cars I have driven on pure highway trips have have seen as high as 35 and quite often 34 MPG with a 4 cylinder spanking V6 and 224 HP. The Auras exterior is much more pleasing than the bland generic plain Camry with it's taxi cab cheap plastic wheel covers, no bodyside moldings and frumpy front end treatment.

  • 56m65711446 Well, I had a suburban auto repair shop in those days.
  • Dukeisduke Yikes - reading the recall info from NHTSA, this sounds like the Hyundai/Kia 2.4l Theta II "engine fire" recall, since it involves an engine block or oil pan "breach", so basically, throwing a rod:"Description of the Safety Risk : Engine oil and/or fuel vapor that accumulates near a sufficiently hot surface, below the combustion initiation flame speed, may ignite resulting in an under hood fire, and increasing the risk of injury. Description of the Cause :Isolated engine manufacturing issues have resulted in 2.5L HEV/PHEV engine failures involving engine block or oil pan breach. In the event of an engine block or oil pan breach, the HEV/PHEV system continues to propel the vehicle allowing the customer to continue to drive the vehicle. As the customer continues to drive after a block breach, oil and/or fuel vapor continues to be expelled and accumulates near ignition sources, primarily expected to be the exhaust system. Identification of Any Warning that can Occur :Engine failure is expected to produce loud noises (example: metal-to-metal clank) audible to the vehicle’s occupants. An engine failure will also result in a reduction in engine torque. In Owner Letters mailed to customers, Ford will advise customers to safely park and shut off the engine as promptly as possible upon hearing unexpected engine noises, after experiencing an unexpected torque reduction, or if smoke is observed emanating from the engine compartment."
  • Dukeisduke In an ideal world, cars would be inspected in the way the MoT in the UK does it, or the TÜV in Germany. But realistically, a lot of people can't afford to keep their cars to such a high standard since they need them for work, and widespread public transit isn't a thing here.I would like the inspections to stick around (I've lived in Texas all my life, and annual inspections have always been a thing), but there's so much cheating going on (and more and more people don't bother to get their cars inspected or registration renewed), so without rigorous enforcement (which is basically a cop noticing your windshield sticker is out of date, or pulling you over for an equipment violation), there's no real point anymore.
  • Zipper69 Arriving in Florida from Europe and finding ZERO inspection procedures I envisioned roads crawling with wrecks held together with baling wire, duct tape and prayer.Such proved NOT to be the case, plenty of 20-30 year old cars and trucks around but clearly "unsafe at any speed" vehicles are few and far between.Could this be because the median age here is 95, so a lot of low mileage vehicles keep entering the market as the owners expire?
  • Zipper69 At the heart of GM’s resistance to improving the safety of its fuel systems was a cost benefit analysis done by Edward Ivey which concluded that it was not cost effective for GM to spend more than $2.20 per vehicle to prevent a fire death. When deposed about his cost benefit analysis, Mr. Ivey was asked whether he could identify a more hazardous location for the fuel tank on a GM pickup than outside the frame. Mr. Ivey responded, “Well yes…You could put in on the front bumper.”