Acura RSX Review

William C Montgomery
by William C Montgomery

Dearly beloved, we are gathered here to honor the Acura RSX, whose life was cut short by overlapping products and muddled brand identity. Since 2002, this, the US version of the fourth generation Honda Integra, has enjoyed strong consumer support and numerous awards from erstwhile auto critics, including two consecutive year’s on Car and Driver’s 10Best list. But we are not here to debate the value of ad-sponsored gongs or mourn the passing of a beloved automobile. We are here to celebrate a life well lived.

Until it ceased production this summer, the Acura RSX was an upgraded seventh generation Civic coupe. To differentiate the two models, Acura’s brandgineers gave the RSX a lower and wider stance than its Honda counterpart. It also blessed the RSX’ snout with a vertical crease, bisecting the model’s nose from bumper to windshield, forming an aerodynamic point. The model’s steeply raked windshield starts an arc that terminates down the rear of the steeply raked rear window. The lift back design reveals the RSX for what it is: a longish three-door hatchback. Overall, the RSX’ clean and uncluttered looks lacked both brand identity and charisma, a lethal combination (ipso facto).

Once inside, Steve Jobs himself would applaud the RSX’ no-brainer ergonomics. The car’s curved dash pod is blissfully, elegantly Spartan; free from the infestation of dials and buttons, bells and whistles that clutter most new cars. You get three Playskool knobs for your climate control, a few glove-friendly radio buttons for your BOSE blaster, a hazard switch and that’s all she wrote. Also delightfully absent: in-dash GPS, car phone, onboard computer and all the other electronic tchotchkes that distract enthusiasts from the art of driving.

The top of the RSX’ dash is lined with a substance of uncertain origin called “textured titanium.” While the dashboard’s clothing isn’t particularly attractive or sporty-looking, props to Acura for deploying a material that hasn't [apparently] been pumped from beneath Saudi sand or peeled off the butt of a dead cow. The front seats hug driver and passenger. The rear chairs are inescapable invitations to experiment with yoga; anyone taller than five feet will find themselves craning for comfort. I can’t imagine that many RSX buyers are overly concerned about cargo, but with seats up, the Acura can stash more stuff than a Mitsubishi Eclipse or Scion tC.

A suave demeanor and a thick Russian accent masked the enthusiasm of my Acura guide, Serguei. But his love for the coupe became evident the moment he hurled the RSX through a cloverleaf interchange. (He may not have many RSX left to sell, but sell them he does.) Once we made the changeover, the RSX’ thick steering wheel inspired immediate confidence. The variable power assist rack-and-pinion steering is razor sharp, delivering precise information on the front hoops, and outstanding control of same.

The coupe’s light curb weight (2734 pounds) and sport-tuned suspension (McPherson struts in front, double wishbone at the back) give the RSX superb flickabilty. The car stays flat through the corners, yielding moderate and predictable understeer when pushed. Yet the progressive-rate rear shocks float over small bumps without harshness, with the all-season 16’s delivering daily driver compliant comfort.

That said, there is no question whatsoever that this is the high-strung member of the Acura family. To wit, the RSX’ 2.0-liter engine produces 155hp @ 6500rpm. That may be as nothing to the Type-S’ sky-high 8100rpm redline, but caning the RSX involves regular forays to the iVTEC powerplant’s penthouse. Meanwhile, torque steer is virtually non-existent; there’s not enough torque to pull the helm sideways. In other respects, the RSX' smooth-spinning mill is impressive in the typical Honda fashion, achieving Low-Emissions Vehicle (LEV-2) standards while traveling 27 miles per gallon in the city and 34mpg on the highway.

The RSX’ brakes are its biggest disappointment. The four-wheel disk ABS-controlled binders tell the right story on paper. In practice, they struggle to get the job done. Under emergency stops, the left and right ABS channels do not appear to be synchronized, creating a disconcerting Jitterbug vibration. Pistonheads would be well advised to factor-in the price of a major brake upgrade when considering an RSX.

As is, the RSX is the perfect car for a driver that wants a sports car without a lot of horsepower (e.g. unmarried people that gravitate to careers that involve chalk and erasers, white shoes or telephone headsets). Rumor has it that the RSX may not be the last Acura to dabble in the sub-$30k segment. Although nothing has been officially announced, only a couple of model years are likely pass before Acura produces another small coupe. Acura is sure to festoon any new model with a raft of techno-baubles that blight the TL, which were artfully absent in the RSX. Until then, RSX RIP.

William C Montgomery
William C Montgomery

More by William C Montgomery

Join the conversation
2 of 53 comments
  • Davada Davada on Jan 27, 2013

    I own a 2006 Acura RSX Type S love it! I don't particularly want to sell this car to get a truck for pulling an Airstream I can settle on a small light model of airstream if it is possible to pull it with my RSX Type S. Wondering who knows what the possibilities are, of this car pulling an 4000 lb 19 ft Airstream trailer? Thank you kindly

  • North Country North Country on Feb 18, 2019

    Late to the article, just stumbled upon—couple months ago I was in the market for a new car and rather than going newer than my Subaru decided I best pick up an RSX, a car I'd long admired and a car it's getting tough to find decent miles, not modded, Canada here so not rusted out as well. Take what you can find—low mileage Premium (three model variants were released in Canada), auto, gotta say first impressions are what I'd hoped for: crisp fantastic handling, decent acceleration, Acura quality finish, and as someone else said here, it fits, sliding into the car it's like you're putting it on. Love the simplicity of the interior, knobs! no touchscreen thank you, my bare min mod cons are present with heated seats and mirrors (again, Canada) and sunroof. Stock stereo was swapped out by previous owner, is decent. Gas mileage to me after years of AWD only is phenomenal. We've had some wickedly cold winter days this year, car has sat for 2-3 at a time, starts right off (winter tires otherwise it was pretty useless in any snow). I love the shape and I love smaller cars, wish Acura would do another, it's remarkable this car at 17 years old still garners looks. Haven't had it for too long but after having the RSX on my 'some day' shortlist for a very long time I'm glad I found one, it's a great sporty hatch (I love a hatch). It does carry higher insurance rates however.

  • Teddyc73 We need a new president.
  • Teddyc73 The bigger question is when did automaker or auto manufacturer become "OEM".
  • Dave M. This certainly seems like a decent vehicle for the money. Have to say I like the design as well.
  • Redapple2 Oh. Spent some time in a newish Lexus ES 350 with V -6. What a lovely motorcar. It has surpassed the 300 as my favorite sedan.
  • Redapple2 So the folks want CUV and not sedans. Why? 1- up higher, see better. 2 Ingree egress higher H point. 3 CUV s are seen as more outdoorsy, rugged than a car. 4 My personal thought. Given a cars footprint. A CUV with it s upright build (upright sitting, heels much lower than hips) has more interior room than a car.