Chevrolet Aveo5 Review

Frank Williams
by Frank Williams

General Motors is at it again. After failing to flog captive imports from Opel, Isuzu and Suzuki, The General’s drafted in Daewoo to give Chevy’s “American Revolution” something to sell. Considering GM’s lack of success with captive imports in the past, and Daewoo’s Titanic troubles in the US market, you have to wonder about RenCen’s reasoning vis-à-vis the rebadged machine known on this side of the Pacific as the Chevrolet Aveo. Has GM made yet another logistical mistake, or will they have the last laugh as vendors of the only domestic nameplate selling a high-mileage subcompact car in the US?

As part of the overseas adoption process, Chevy subjected the Aveo to a bit of automotive bow-tox, grafting the family Chevy logo across the Korean’s grill-less grill opening. From there backwards, it’s pure Daewoo. Although the four-door’s been restyled for ’07, the five-door hatchback soldiers on with slab sides, broken by character lines lifted from a 30-year old Datsun B-210. Depending on your age and gender, the overall reaction varies from “like, totally cute!” to “WTF is that thing?”

The interior is lousy with cheap. The instruments and warning lights occupy two humps on a dashboard that fell off a minivan assembly line. The center AC vents perch on the leading edge of the dashboard like an overnight tree fungus. Hollow-sounding doors, fake carbon fiber trim, carpeting with pile shorter than the hair on a Chihuahua’s ears and a headliner made of the same felt found on $100 pool tables complete the ambiance. No matter which of the senses you engage, you know you’re in the bargain basement’s basement.

With the seat up, Aveo’s stubby tail provides enough cargo space for a couple of adolescent contortionists. Fold the seat down and you can add a family of midgets. More worryingly, the top of the rear seat is only about 15 inches from the rear hatch. To put it into perspective, roughly 24 inches separate your rear seat passengers’ heads from the H2’s brush bar at your rear bumper. The sturdily upholstered front seats are wide enough to accommodate your gluteus even if it’s a bit more than maximus. Unfortunately they also provide the lateral support of a barstool. Factor in the short bottom cushions and lack of lumbar support, and you have the automotive equivalent of Chuck E. Cheese–- you’ll go there if you have to, but you’re not going to stay any longer than necessary.

The driving dynamics aren’t. Throttle response is eventual, acceleration is leisurely and steering feel is implied. Applying the brakes is like stepping on a day old jelly-filled Krispy Kreme. The 103hp “little engine that couldn’t” runs out of steam in a hurry, especially when pulling long hills, at which point all it’s good for is converting petrochemicals (with or without ethanol) into noise. Compounding the problem is a four-speed automatic transmission that hunts for gears like a madwoman looking for the bargains at a shoe sale.

The underpowered drivetrain provides a single benefit: knowing you’ll never overpower the suspension. The Aveo will safely negotiate gentle corners at moderate speeds, but its puny tires and lack of acceleration mean the fun ends before you start the engine. Between the squealing 14-inch rubber and Poseidon Adventure body roll, you’ll lose your nerve long before the car loses control.

The only shiny spot in the Aveo’s bland existence is also its raison d'être: fuel economy. Let’s face it: even without the “sudden” demand for fuel efficient cars, GM needed an mpg superstar to offset the CAFE problems caused by its full line of efficiency-challenged SUV’s and pickups. And so the Korean penalty box travels 27 miles for every gallon of petrochemical rotgut its more “careful” owners are likely to buy. On the highway, they’ll score 37 EPA miles per gallon. Owners can bask in the knowledge that they’re enduring GM’s highest mileage US product, ignoring the fact that every Aveo sold helps GM crank-out even more gas-sucking trucks.

Unfortunately the General’s best ain’t good enough. The rental-friendly Aveo faces off against some highly evolved competition including the Fit and Yaris, both of which break the 40mpg barrier on the highway. In reality, I can’t find a good reason to choose the Aveo over either of those or even over a Kia Rio. Honda and Toyota offer reliability of mythic proportions, while Kia provides a warranty even better than Chevy’s “best in America” five year/100,000 mile powertrain coverage.

When Chrysler enters the fray with a rebadged Chery and Ford finally realizes they actually need a marketable small car to survive, the competition will heat up even more. GM needs to move quickly to improve the Aveo and bring it up to world-class standards. Otherwise they’ll have to send yet another captive import back home in shame.

Frank Williams
Frank Williams

More by Frank Williams

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 113 comments
  • Amywaco30 Amywaco30 on Feb 05, 2008

    I love cars, and the Aveo's not the most stylish or sporty car in the world. It is, however, dog gone inexpensive. I purchased a new Aveo for $7200 out the door. The driving experience is fine--better than any 10-year-old compact or subcompact, which was what i was driving. The warranty is a key feature for a car at this price point. Others in this thread have said it well. When you rely upon one car as primary transportation, a new car with a 5-year warranty is a good value. The way I figure it, I got this car for three times the price of a Tata Nano. This car is probably four times better than the Nano in terms of build quality, functionality, useability, safety, and reliability. On that scale, this is probably the best cheap car available anywhere.

  • 1tonvans 1tonvans on Dec 06, 2009

    I own an 05, got it new for less than $4000 with rebates. It was worth that but not much more. I have the hatchback; I took out the back seat so there is lots of room to haul stuff. I have 80,ooo miles on it and it is starting to get very loud. I doubt it will hit 100k. Other than this disturbing noisy development, I have not had any major mechanical problems with the aveo. I would buy another new one if I could get it for the under $4k price again. It looks like an orange shoebox, so at least it is not as boring looking as all of those fugly sedans out there. I have the manual tranny, get about 33 mpg on Colorado e-ways, almost all highway miles. It gets up to 80 with no problem, and has decent pick-up if you know how to use a stick. Handles OK in the snow if you put some extra weight in it in the winter. Glad I bought it.

  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Thankfully I don't have to deal with GDI issues in my Frontier. These cleaners should do well for me if I win.
  • Theflyersfan Serious answer time...Honda used to stand for excellence in auto engineering. Their first main claim to fame was the CVCC (we don't need a catalytic converter!) engine and it sent from there. Their suspensions, their VTEC engines, slick manual transmissions, even a stowing minivan seat, all theirs. But I think they've been coasting a bit lately. Yes, the Civic Type-R has a powerful small engine, but the Honda of old would have found a way to get more revs out of it and make it feel like an i-VTEC engine of old instead of any old turbo engine that can be found in a multitude of performance small cars. Their 1.5L turbo-4...well...have they ever figured out the oil dilution problems? Very un-Honda-like. Paint issues that still linger. Cheaper feeling interior trim. All things that fly in the face of what Honda once was. The only thing that they seem to have kept have been the sales staff that treat you with utter contempt for daring to walk into their inner sanctum and wanting a deal on something that isn't a bare-bones CR-V. So Honda, beat the rest of your Japanese and Korean rivals, and plug-in hybridize everything. If you want a relatively (in an engineering way) easy way to get ahead of the curve, raise the CAFE score, and have a major point to advertise, and be able to sell to those who can't plug in easily, sell them on something that will get, for example, 35% better mileage, plug in when you get a chance, and drives like a Honda. Bring back some of the engineering skills that Honda once stood for. And then start introducing a portfolio of EVs once people are more comfortable with the idea of plugging in. People seeing that they can easily use an EV for their daily errands with the gas engine never starting will eventually sell them on a future EV because that range anxiety will be lessened. The all EV leap is still a bridge too far, especially as recent sales numbers have shown. Baby steps. That's how you win people over.
  • Theflyersfan If this saves (or delays) an expensive carbon brushing off of the valves down the road, I'll take a case. I understand that can be a very expensive bit of scheduled maintenance.
  • Zipper69 A Mini should have 2 doors and 4 cylinders and tires the size of dinner plates.All else is puffery.
  • Theflyersfan Just in time for the weekend!!! Usual suspects A: All EVs are evil golf carts, spewing nothing but virtue signaling about saving the earth, all the while hacking the limbs off of small kids in Africa, money losing pits of despair that no buyer would ever need and anyone that buys one is a raging moron with no brains and the automakers who make them want to go bankrupt.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Usual suspects B: All EVs are powered by unicorns and lollypops with no pollution, drive like dreams, all drivers don't mind stopping for hours on end, eating trays of fast food at every rest stop waiting for charges, save the world by using no gas and batteries are friendly to everyone, bugs included. Everyone should torch their ICE cars now and buy a Tesla or Bolt post haste.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Or those in the middle: Maybe one of these days, when the charging infrastructure is better, or there are more options that don't cost as much, one will be considered as part of a rational decision based on driving needs, purchasing costs environmental impact, total cost of ownership, and ease of charging.(Source: many on this site who don't jump on TTAC the split second an EV article appears and lives to trash everyone who is a fan of EVs.)
Next