Honda Civic Hybrid Review
In the waning years of the twenty first century, when the world's petroleum reserves finally near exhaustion, hydrogen fuel cells will most likely propel our personal transportation. These cars of the future will be practical, safe, fuel efficient, clean-running and dull. The gas – electric Honda Civic Hybrid (HCH) could well be the prototype for this new breed of automobile; where all the car's harmful social and environmental byproducts have been minimized, and all the fun of driving has been designed out of existence.
Strangely enough, the HCH's exterior isn't dreary. From some angles, you could even call it rakish. While this site has criticized the Civic's severely tilted windscreen, I consider the HCH's near-horizontal glasshouse a welcome bit of drama on an otherwise conventional shape. The details are equally well-judged. In a world of cars with enormous projector beam headlamps, the HCH's eyes are dignified and restrained. And the sedan's rear– complete with its all-important hybrid badge– is as handsome as the Audi sedans it slavishly copies.
The HCH's interior is cutting edge contemporary– provided you set the Way Back machine to 1973. The cabin's [petroleum-based] plastics are well-formed and satisfying to the touch, but their omnipresence soon becomes oppressive. Seat adjustments are few (what happened to the lumbar support?) and our tester's fabric covers reminded me of the great mass velour extinctions of the late Disco Era. The HCH's raked windscreen places so much dash in front of you that only the protruding speedo prevents drivers from developing horizontal vertigo. Although the distance to the window creates an illusion of unlimited space, the HCH's cabin is no larger than a standard small car's.
The HCH's music system plays all manner digital files with faithful reproduction– which is just as well. The sound helps mask the stripped-down car's endless road roar. The navigation system listens attentively, understands your commands intuitively and reacts appropriately. If you need to find the closest Korean restaurant to Topeka, Kansas, it dutifully directs you to drive 1560 miles to Los Angeles for dinner. The one toy we expected to see– some kind of hi-tech Prius-like readout showing battery power regeneration– takes the form of a relatively pedestrian digital display on the left of the gigantic tacho.
Twist the HCH's key and there is little reward, just a quiet hum. Tipping the progress pedal unleashes an initial surge of acceleration– that immediately tails off to a slow canter. Woe to the operator whose accelerative expectations are calibrated to vehicles born during the days of cheap and plentiful fossil fuel. While driving an HCH in traffic, a sextant may prove useful. A call down to the engine room brings varying pitched moaning sounds depending upon how much one's ears can tolerate. Regardless, the rate of acceleration remains fairly constant and completely relaxed.
While the brakes get credit for recharging the HCH's battery pack, pressing the stoppers feels like you've lowered a wooden beam onto the tarmac. Panic stops are. The HCH's slender tires amplify this worrying non-effect in the rain. The Honda hybrid's handling will appeal mostly to those experienced in the two-man bobsled; there's plenty of roll and slippage through the turns. Driving the HCH at highway speeds is also a challenge; any kind of incline drives the CVT transmission crazy. There is simply no way to maintain a constant pace without resorting to cruise control. Even then, the tach ascends to 6000 rpm or more when mounting significant grades.
Of course, no one buys an HCH because they like to drive. They want excellent gas mileage (and the right to solo in California's high occupancy vehicle lanes). In 1400 miles of mixed urban and highway driving, I filled the tank three times. The first time, there were only few miles on the odometer. I didn't expect much in the way of economy and still calculated 43 miles per gallon. With the second tank, I tried harder to conserve fuel. I was rewarded with 47 miles per gallon. By the third tank, I'd lost all interest in economy and just wanted to get the test drive over and done with– and still wound up getting 47 miles per gallon.
The HCH may be the perfect car for fuel misers, but it only offers pistonheads one major advantage: it's so unrewarding to drive fast that you eventually give-up and drive under the speed limit. Of course, when you do that, it's win – win – win. You're helping to save the earth. You're making the safety Nazis happy. And you're protecting your driver's license. Of course, a slowly-driven Honda hybrid also blocks people who love to drive, and drive fast. But don't worry. One way or another, they're doomed. Yes, I've driven the future. It's safe, clean, frugal and tedious.
Join the conversation
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- Prabirmehta I charge my EV at home 100% of the time. The EV is used for in-town driving and the gas guzzling SUV is used for out of town trips. This results in a huge cost saving and rare trips to the gas station.
- Conundrum Three cylinder Ford Escapes, Chevy whatever it is that competes, and now the Rogue. Great, ain't it? Toyota'll be next with a de-tuned GR Corolla/Yaris powerplant. It's your life getting better and better, yes indeed. A piston costs money, you know.The Rogue and Altima used to have the zero graviy foam front seats. Comfy, but the new Rogue dumps that advance. Costs money. And that color-co-ordinated gray interior, my, ain't it luvverly? Ten years after they perfected it in the first Versa to appeal to the terminally depressed, it graduates to the Rogue.There's nothing decent to buy on the market for normal money. Not a damn thing interests me at all.
- Inside Looking Out It looks good and is popular in SF Bay Area.
- Inside Looking Out Ford F150 IMHO. It is a true sports car on our freeways.
- Inside Looking Out Articles like that are nirvana for characters like EBFlex.
Way off base on the report...I've driven this car and it drives nothing like what you say. I think you drove this car thinking it's a SI sports car when it's not made for it. But it still feels like a regular Civic EX Sedan which, by all accounts, feels pretty good and solid and safe. I won't put a 70 mph speed dash through the cones but to slam it because it doesn't and call it the FUTURE?? This is Honda's interpretation of the future...or immediate future option. Who said driving an ecomomical, fuel frugal car has to be boring? I just don't get that mentality.
Ok, I'm a "Piston Head" owning a 1973 Challenger (340=6 MPG), 1969 Charger RT/SE (440MAG = 5 MPG), and a Lincoln Navigator 4X4 (10 MPG). What's funny is I just bought a 2008 Honda Civic Hybird. What's even funnier is I live in Michigan! This "Piston Head" finds the Civic Hybird enjoyable to drive. It's a bit challenging navigating the Detroit Freeway system, but not because it's an import, but rather I feel real small among the SUV's, Semi traffic, and pot holes more like Moon craters. My Civic Hybird averages 32 MPG in cold weather (30 degrees and less), but managed 38 MPG on the HWY doing 70 MPH (still a bit slow for Detroit). I admit the Civic's performance is not impressive, but I choose it over the Prius only because I wanted to drive a fuel efficient vehicle that looked like a car and not an enviornmental statement. I will never drive my Civic in heavy snows because I'm told the plastic skid plates on the undercarriage are designed for areodynamics and would probably get ripped off, so I'll park it in the garage and drive the big gun Navigator (10 MPG). Yes, I love to drive big, fast, 8cyl vehicles, but at $3.00 (+) a gallon for gas, I'm learning to reserve the need for speed for short weekend drives. If I was asked to rate my Civic Hybird on a scale 1 to 10, I would rate it an 8 for comfort, drivability, handeling, Safety, and fuel economy. But no one asked me to rate it! The Civic Hybird does what it's designed to do; save fuel and reduce our carbon footprint. No I'm not a tree hugger....yet!