Chevrolet Corvette Review

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

Ever since I can remember, the Chevrolet Corvette has been the fat Elvis of sports cars. Every few years, someone would try to convince me that “America’s sports car” had received the engineering upgrades it needed to restore faded glory. But no. The latest ‘Vette was always a dynamic disaster: a feeble chassis married to lackluster brakes and an incompetent suspension, with more than enough horsepower to make it swap ends with frightening ease. Oh, and the car’s interior remained the only place capable of making a Motel 6 bedroom seem luxurious.

When the latest generation Corvette convertible hoved into view, my expectations were lower than its pavement-scuffing front fascia. Within a week I went from outright hostility to perplexed suspicion, to grudging admiration, to total addiction. The new Corvette still provides plenty of grist for a critic’s mill, but it is, finally, a car an enthusiast can grab by the scruff of its neck, thrash to an inch of its redline, throw into a corner and live to tell the tale.

And oh, what tales! Of vicious corners conquered at heroic speeds, to the sound of ripping rubber and Odin’s induction hammer. Of careening down open highways, posting an ascending stream of triple digit numbers on an ethereal display, knowing there are two more gears left in the V8’s quiver. Of leaping trains of stupefied traffic in a single bound, downing that heady cocktail of schadenfreude and temporal freedom that comes from leaving fellow road users for dead.

Of course, there’s nothing particularly sophisticated about Chevy’s supercar soufflé: light weight, low center of gravity, loads of power, epic torque and sticky tires. By the same token, Lenox Lewis’ right hook isn’t the most elegant of punches, but it gets the job done. That said, the credit for the ‘Vette’s transformation from gold chain goliath to serious sports car goes to its controllable chassis and indefatigable brakes.

Whereas previous ‘Vettes felt as skittish as a new born foal, the new, smaller C6 is planted and predictable all the way to the limits of adhesion– and beyond! Whereas previous ‘Vettes had a Harley Davidson’s ability to make you think ‘OK, I’d really like to stop now’, the C6 ceases forward motion with all the finality of a period hammered into the end of a declarative sentence. [NB: The test car included the nominally optional Z51 Performance Package.]

The Corvette’s inability to maintain lateral stability over broken pavement is its Achilles heel. Blast the ‘Vette over a stretch of rippled concrete and the machine dry-quaplanes. For an infinite instant, the Corvette’s helm has no effect whatsoever on the car’s direction. Bottom line: a Porsche pilot can attack a road without undue concern about surface quality, while a sensible ‘Vette driver must constantly monitor the situation, back-off when necessary, or die. With that limitation in mind, caning a C6 Corvette is as much fun as you can have with your clothes on– unless you drive naked.

In every other way, the Corvette is the same old piece of kit. Aesthetically, it’s so not a classic it hurts. Faired-in projector headlights, descending front and rear strakes (that make the car look like it’s sagging in the middle), blobular side mirrors, circular taillights– the Devil’s in the details. The previous Corvette’s Rubenesque body displayed a purity of form and simplicity of line that a Ferraristi could [grudgingly] admire. The new shape is more Viper than voluptuous.

Once again, still, the ‘Vette’s interior is cheaper (and nastier) than malt liquor. The cabin is suffused with model airplane plastic– from the world’s flimsiest ashtray to the most unconvincing metal-effect binnacle ever created by hand of man. The wet-look plastic cowls behind the seats is existentially horrendous; why do bad things happen to good polymers? The ‘Vette’s seats lack sufficient lateral bolstering for maximum G’s, or thigh support for long distance love. And the steering wheel looks like a decapitated dwarf.

Chevy’s usual defense is to reprise the Bang for The Buck theme song and hope the audience hums the tune as it leaves the showroom, forgiving and forgetting the Corvette’s ergonomic and aesthetic failings. The truth is that the C6’s action sequences are compelling enough for endless repeats, while the V8’s soundtrack (above 4000rpm) haunts the enthusiast’s dreams. Sure, but is the new Corvette better than a 911 or, for that matter, a Boxster S? That depends on whether you prefer the perfectly polished energy of the young, RCA Elvis; or the raw power of Mr. ’68 Comeback Special. Either way, open-minded pistonheads can rejoice: fat Elvis has left the building.

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Thankfully I don't have to deal with GDI issues in my Frontier. These cleaners should do well for me if I win.
  • Theflyersfan Serious answer time...Honda used to stand for excellence in auto engineering. Their first main claim to fame was the CVCC (we don't need a catalytic converter!) engine and it sent from there. Their suspensions, their VTEC engines, slick manual transmissions, even a stowing minivan seat, all theirs. But I think they've been coasting a bit lately. Yes, the Civic Type-R has a powerful small engine, but the Honda of old would have found a way to get more revs out of it and make it feel like an i-VTEC engine of old instead of any old turbo engine that can be found in a multitude of performance small cars. Their 1.5L turbo-4...well...have they ever figured out the oil dilution problems? Very un-Honda-like. Paint issues that still linger. Cheaper feeling interior trim. All things that fly in the face of what Honda once was. The only thing that they seem to have kept have been the sales staff that treat you with utter contempt for daring to walk into their inner sanctum and wanting a deal on something that isn't a bare-bones CR-V. So Honda, beat the rest of your Japanese and Korean rivals, and plug-in hybridize everything. If you want a relatively (in an engineering way) easy way to get ahead of the curve, raise the CAFE score, and have a major point to advertise, and be able to sell to those who can't plug in easily, sell them on something that will get, for example, 35% better mileage, plug in when you get a chance, and drives like a Honda. Bring back some of the engineering skills that Honda once stood for. And then start introducing a portfolio of EVs once people are more comfortable with the idea of plugging in. People seeing that they can easily use an EV for their daily errands with the gas engine never starting will eventually sell them on a future EV because that range anxiety will be lessened. The all EV leap is still a bridge too far, especially as recent sales numbers have shown. Baby steps. That's how you win people over.
  • Theflyersfan If this saves (or delays) an expensive carbon brushing off of the valves down the road, I'll take a case. I understand that can be a very expensive bit of scheduled maintenance.
  • Zipper69 A Mini should have 2 doors and 4 cylinders and tires the size of dinner plates.All else is puffery.
  • Theflyersfan Just in time for the weekend!!! Usual suspects A: All EVs are evil golf carts, spewing nothing but virtue signaling about saving the earth, all the while hacking the limbs off of small kids in Africa, money losing pits of despair that no buyer would ever need and anyone that buys one is a raging moron with no brains and the automakers who make them want to go bankrupt.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Usual suspects B: All EVs are powered by unicorns and lollypops with no pollution, drive like dreams, all drivers don't mind stopping for hours on end, eating trays of fast food at every rest stop waiting for charges, save the world by using no gas and batteries are friendly to everyone, bugs included. Everyone should torch their ICE cars now and buy a Tesla or Bolt post haste.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Or those in the middle: Maybe one of these days, when the charging infrastructure is better, or there are more options that don't cost as much, one will be considered as part of a rational decision based on driving needs, purchasing costs environmental impact, total cost of ownership, and ease of charging.(Source: many on this site who don't jump on TTAC the split second an EV article appears and lives to trash everyone who is a fan of EVs.)
Next