TTAC Outs Chrysler Investors. For Real.

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

TTAC has been working with our Best and Brightest to uncover the hidden investors behind Chrysler. We’ve made some headway. First, the name of Cerberus’ Chrysler funds: Cerberus CG Investor I LLC, Cerberus CG Investor II LLC, Cerberus CG Investor III LLC. The information came from Daimler [click here then search for “CG Investor”; it’s under structure of the transaction]. Searching for hits on the CG funds, we’ve unearthed Franklin Templeton Investments’ Mutual Recovery Fund. Here’s the money shot: the fund’s 2008 Annual Report. Scroll down to page 5 (their numbering), second footnote. And there it is. And now we can drill down to some interesting info…

Scroll down to page 24 (of the document itself). The Cerberus CG Investor funds (I – III) are listed under “Consumer Finance.” Why? As far as we know, these CG funds did NOT include investments in Chrysler Financial and/or GMAC.

And here’s something else that’s curious. Scroll down to the bottom of page 27 (their numbering). Those same amounts are listed as “Corporate Bonds and Notes.” It appears that Cerberus has agreed to pay Franklin Templeton 12 percent on this investment on 7/31/14.

I leave it to our Best and Brightest to further interpret/explain (please!) the implications of this data. Meanwhile, another hit, in my backyard no less: the Factory Mutual Insurance Company of Johnston, RI. Search within the document for “Cerberus.” It appears pals at Morgan Stanley (another thread revealed) sold Factory Mutual $1.6m worth of CG goodness.

Here’s another one: York Enhanced Strategies Fund, LLC. They own $12m of “Cerberus CG Investor, LLC”, as seen on a SEC form N-Q filing.

The information raises some interesting questions. Well, lots. How was the original deal structured? Why are there three separate funds? Were these investors co-investors in the original Chrysler purchase, or “general” investors in Cerberus assuming risk? How much Chrysler-related paper does Cerberus own? Who owns the majority?

Thanks to Phil Turland and Brian E for the detective work. A quick email from Cerberus (robertfarago1@gmail.com) to clarify these issues would be most appreciated.

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 29 comments
  • Ihatetrees Ihatetrees on Feb 12, 2009
    countryboy: It is somewhat interesting, but I too don’t really understand the point of it all. It is EXACTLY like looking at one’s mortgage if it has been securitized and sold. My personal mortgage has changed hands now 5 times. You missed Mr Farago's point. Responsible investment houses are hiding / not labeling Cerberus CG Investor funds (I - III) as 'Automotive' or 'Auto Manufacturing'.
  • Leland Witter Leland Witter on Feb 17, 2009

    I'm late to this conversation, but this sure sounds like some sort of conspiracy theory group. Cerberus is a private equity firm which is pretty much like it sounds. They take in private (read individual, not secretive) investments and then use that pool of capital to purchase or invest in companies. I am no expert in the PE world, but have worked with a few in a consulting role. If you have enough money, it is relatively simple for anyone to become an investor in a private equity fund. Depending on the PE company, the hurdle could be tens or hundreds of thousands or even millions. Investors could be the rich who are looking for additional opportunities outside the stock market, or pension funds, colleges, etc. There is nothing at all nefarious about the multiple funds that some people seem to think means something. PE firms start up new funds periodically to raise a chunk of money and it is generally invested separately from previous funds. Basically, they will decide to start, say, a new $100 million dollar fund and when they get that amount raised, they start buying and selling portfolio companies or portions of them. If you are bought into Fund 4, you win or lose based on that portfolio's performance. What happens in Fund 3 really is irrelevant to you as an investor. After some period of buying, holding, and selling companies the fund is, many times, finished after the last sale and the profits (hopefully) disbursed to the investors. Some PE firms are specific in the types of investments they make, such as retail, manufacturing, etc. and sometimes the individual fund will be as well. Other times the fund is made up of a mix of different portfolio companies. Generally speaking, PE firms are looking for distressed or undercapitalized companies that can be turned around or merged into other portfolio companies to create synergies. Or perhaps a division can get spun off into a more successful standalone company if it isn't encumbered or overshadowed by the current parent. Once they become successful (by whatever criteria) they could go public or be sold to private investors or another PE firm. People seem to want to make Private Equity out to be some sort of exotic investment vehicle, but it is probably the closest to "pure" investing there is outside of buying a company yourself. A bunch of people pool their money in a PE fund and then their (the PE firm's) smart people figure out what companies to buy and how they can improve them so that they can be sold for more later.

  • Steve Biro At a $27K starting point - often with additional dealer discounts - the Equinox was an attractive option for many on a tighter budget. Especially when the FWD model came with a traditional six-speed automatic.Now, with a starting point of just under $30K (and discounts much smaller and/or less likely for a couple of years) and a CVT, the Equinox is suddenly much less competitive.Add to that the need to pay an extra $2K for AWD just to get a real transmission, and the Equinox isn't very competitive at all. An AWD base version will start at about $32K and an RS or Activ will be $36K and change - quite laughable. And one is still stuck with that 1.5-liter turbo powerplant.If this is what Chevy is demanding for the ICE Equinox, it's no wonder a $30K EV version turned out to be vaporware.
  • AZFelix I know someone who spent a night in a Dodge Dynasty. The velour interior was the best part of the experience.
  • MKizzy Looking at the high-nosed Equinox and its assumed huge front blind spots, I see why Mayor Pete wants to mandate improved AEB on all vehicles.In addition, GM's lack of commitment to its ICE powertrains is on full display with its continued use of its class-trailing 1.xT engines. The new Equinox may be all show/no go, but at least after a decade of shoving its 1.5T into the Equinox and Malibu, you'd think GM would've at least made it top flight reliable by now.
  • Daniel China can absolutely make quality products when contracted at the right prices or their car companies trying to compete. However, I doubt any of their nearly 100 EV companies would even want to try to break into the US market with a 25% tariff (Polestar pays this) and the huge service and support network needed other than *maaaaybe* BYD eventually and only then if they end up using their upcoming plant in Mexico for not just Latin America, but decide to try the US market without the tariffs. They def would need to have excellent quality and support to be taken seriously, we'll see!
  • VoGhost I know one commenter who would love to live in Kia towers.
Next