Toyota R&D Creating $800 Million Investment Fund

On Thursday, Toyota Motor Corp.’s research division announced it would create an $800 million global investment fund. While important news, Toyota’s dispatch was expected. The business had previously mentioned it was assembling a new holding company called Woven in July, noting that the entity would be focused on heavily upon software development and finding new partners for its most advanced projects.

Most of those seem to be in support of the “mobility as a service” concept that seeks to remove customers’ ability to own vehicles. The rest are interested in promoting alternative energy solutions or social engineering how we’ll be living in the future via “smart cities.” The fund also seems to be helping replace Toyota Research Institute-Advanced Development (TRI-AD). In fact, the Japanese R&D arm was actually the one that announced the $800 million “global growth-stage investment fund” that officially creates Woven Capital.

Read more
Toyota Is Becoming a Software Company

Toyota announced the creation of a new holding company that will oversee its software development initiatives this week. While our default response is to gripe about the nebulous concept of “mobility companies” and the industry’s obnoxious emphasis on shifting data, we also understand that it pays to have someone on hand who knows their way around a line of code.

It wasn’t all that long go that Volkswagen was bragging about taking software seriously, only to be publicly shamed by the media when bunk programming screwed up the launch of numerous physical products. The cynical side of the brain knows this could have been avoided by ignoring unnecessary connectivity features and a potentially ill-conceived attempt to digitize the entire cabin.

We’re sympathetic to the nature of competition and the appeal “newness” has on customers. The automotive industry has seen the sea of riches amassed by tech companies harvesting data and knows which way the wind is blowing. No brand wants to be seen as technologically inferior, even if many of the newer features in modern cars aren’t really in service of anything other than marketing. Yet the “software first” mentality that has started presiding over vehicle development seems somewhat counterproductive, and Toyota may have just bought into it hook, line and sinker.

Then again, maybe it’s a great play and we’re just not seeing the big picture. So let’s dive in and see what we find.

Read more
  • Theflyersfan No Chevy SS, No Camaro, No Monte Carlo, hell, no Lumina. Behold the 2024 Hendricks Chevy Suburban stock car.
  • Theflyersfan 2023 Nissan Rogue: Coming soon to a rental car lot near you! So it can be driven at 10 below the speed limit in the left lane when the right lane is wide open. I guess I'm of the age where I remember what Nissan was and still shudder at what they became, although I think I am seeing signs of life. The days when the 300ZX TT was up there with supercars in terms of performance. When the first Altima had the mini-Infiniti J30 styling and interior. When the Sentra SE-R and NX2000 ran with the GTIs and Civic Sis. The Maxima was the Japanese 3-series for those who didn't want to pay that much for the 3-series. And then 20 or so years ago, appliances like this started to appear and the quest for the most sales made as cheaply as possible took over and flushed all of that down the drain. The new Z can help, the new Pathfinder looks like it got the plot back after being lost in the weeds for a while, and I know there's someone in Nissan that would love to go Beast Mode on the Altima. But I look at the Rogue and I see a cheap Toyota. Styling cliches of the times. Gray on Gray on Gray on Gray on Gray with black trim. Name written out in big letters like R O G U E is supposed to have me making a quick U-turn to the next Nissan dealer.What do I see with a Rogue? I see a CUV that was purchased at too high of an interest rate for too long of terms because they wanted something new and the Toyota dealer said no and the Mitsubishi dealer went out of business 10 years ago. I see Point A to Point B transportation where someone prays for reliability, but knows after 80,000 miles, the fuse has been lit on the bomb between the seats. And they justify it by saying that by 80,000 miles, they'll have a better, higher paying job, and one of the kids will be out of braces, and they can refinance the home they overpaid on, and so on. But the better paid job never came. And the braces turned into other medical bills. And the interest rates never went down and you're still overpaying on that house. And there the Rogue sits at 85,000 miles and a dead transmission that will cost thousands to fix. That's what I see when I see a Rogue.
  • MaintenanceCosts My house, currently under renovation, has a L2 charger. Charging via L2 at home is dead simple and way less time-consuming than trips to the gas station. The rental townhouse we’re living in during the renovation only has a regular 120V outlet in the garage. We’ve been using it, and it actually works just fine given the amount we drive, as long as we always remember to plug in. If we forget to plug in for a couple of days straight then it can be tough to get back ahead of the curve. Looking forward to having my L2 back once the project is done.
  • Cprescott Nissan has long become a third rate vehicle maker like Mitsubishi.
  • JMII Not me... but my brother had a hybrid Cayenne for awhile. He charged at home and at work. The vehicle had enough range that 90% of his commute was in EV mode. Since it had a gas engine he was never forced to recharge elsewhere.