Remember The Aztek!

When Pontiac’s infamously retina-searing Aztek pops up in popular auto industry analysis, it’s usually as little more than a throwaway punchline. So credit Thebigmoney.com‘s Matthew DeBord for trying to leave the Thesaurus entry for “ugly” out of a recent piece dedicated entirely to one of the great modern styling miscalculations. Unfortunately, his admirable restraint serves only to further a wholly unsupportable thesis:

GM needs to remember the Aztek, because it represents the kind of risk-taking design that the post-bankruptcy firm will need to go forward. The temptation for the New General will be to copy successful market formulas, rather than try to define new market segments.

Read more
  • Dave M. On one hand Honda tends to make a strong, competitive product that should give you years of excellent service. On the other hand it's built on the bones of a GM product, who has a tendency to underbake their products until right before cancellation. NUMMI worked out well for GM; I wonder if this will work out well for Honda....
  • RICHARD @mebgardner I have no issues with the way the car is configured. No offensive nannies.
  • RICHARD @el_scotto above
  • RICHARD @SPPP. It's the perfect use case. Most of my wife's driving is short trips around town. The car will get better MPG in that environment than interstate cruising.
  • RICHARD The longest interstate trip I have been on so far is about 45 minutes. We live in Tennessee so that included significant elevation changes and travel at 75 mph. Next weekend, we will take a 3-hour trip for a wedding. I would not hesitate to drive long distances in this car. It is much more comfortable, quiet, composed than my wife's previous Ford Fusion Titanium while matching that car's performance. We drove from TN to Santa Fe, NM in the Fusion earlier this summer and that car became uncomfortable and tiring after about 3 hours behind the wheel.