Abandoned History: Ford's Cruise-O-Matic and the C Family of Automatic Transmissions (Part VI)
We return to the final entry in our Cruise-O-Matic and C transmission series, at a time when the former’s Fifties-tastic name had faded from the memory of most. The C family was the wave of the future when it arrived as a rework of the Cruise-O-Matic in 1964. The first of the line was the C4, a medium-duty box that was followed two years later by the heavy-duty C6.
Read more
Abandoned History: Ford's Cruise-O-Matic and the C Family of Automatic Transmissions (Part V)

We resume our Ford Cruise-O-Matic transmission coverage today, as the original two- and three-speed automatics of the Fifties transition into the new C family. C transmissions were designed to be lighter (aluminum) and more efficient than their cast iron predecessors. The wonder of alloys!

In our last entry, we covered the first two C transmissions, the C4 (1964-1981) and C6 (1966-1996). Since we’re proceeding chronologically, we step back to Cruise-O-Matic for a moment, and a mix-and-match transmission: FMX.

Read more
Abandoned History: Ford's Cruise-O-Matic and the C Family of Automatic Transmissions (Part IV)

Last time on our Abandoned History coverage of Ford’s historical Cruise-O-Matic automatic transmission, we spent some time in Russia. Communist automaker GAZ liked Ford’s automatic and decided to lightly rework it into their “own” transmission rather than pay Ford to build it under license. The GAZ two- and three-speed automatics remained in use in the company’s passenger cars well into the Eighties, which was a very long time for a late Fifties transmission to live.

Shortly after GAZ made its copies, the real versions of the FX/MX Cruise-O-Matic and Ford-O-Matic were nearing the end of their respective service lives. The two-speed was naturally the first to go.

Read more
  • Bkojote I'll offer some real consumer insights here based on product rather than low-iq political takes:[list=1][*]A lot of legacy automaker EV's are mostly transitional and expensive. There's little incentive to spend $70k on something that uses outmoded voltage architecture. So a lot of legacy automakers that rushed into the EV space are now realizing that nobody's going to finance a $70k vehicle good for 180 actual miles at 8% APR.[/*][*]Tesla has been crapping the bed on all fronts. See: Cybertruck.[/*][*]The charging network outside of Tesla has serious growing pains. Anything sold without NACS right now might as well by Hydrogen powered.[/*][*]Future EV products are already announced that are more in line with mainstream consumer demands. See: Rivian R3, Lucid Gravity, et. al. Any EV purchased now is going to be exponentially overshadowed by what's on the market in 24-36 months.[/*][*]PHEV vehicles simply make more sense for most people right now. It's why a Rav4 Prime is unobtanium as it offers the best of both worlds, allowing someone to commute on electricity but still take their vehicle on a road trip. [/*][/list=1]
  • Jeff Tesla should have never committed to the Cybertruck. A better choice would have been an inexpensive EV compact pickup which at 30k or below would sell.
  • AZFelix At felony level speeds the HOV lane transition from southbound SR 5 1 to eastbound I-10 in Phoenix mimics driving the curves, dip, and rise of Eau Rouge online.
  • Doug brockman Zero interest in EVs. Right now my Tundra with 38 gallon tank will roll about 500 miles before refueling which takes about five minutes.
  • Jpolicke They sold these with manual trans? Wow, this may be the only one left.