Why Choosing a White Car Could Save Your Life

TTAC Staff
by TTAC Staff
Photo credit: Virrage Images / Shutterstock.com

Recent studies have shed light on how the color of a car might affect its likelihood of being involved in an accident. Research from Monash University’s Accident Research Centre in Australia has provided insightful data on this matter. Their analysis indicates that white cars have a roughly 10 percent lower chance of being involved in an accident during daylight compared to darker-colored vehicles, such as black, blue, gray, green, red, and pink. This conclusion is based on a thorough examination of police-reported crash data in two Australian states.


Further supporting these findings, the University of Auckland analyzed over 36,000 two-car collisions spanning from 1998 to 2012. They discovered that white cars, which represented 21 percent of all registered vehicles, were only involved in 13.3 percent of these accidents. In contrast, black cars, accounting for 11.5 percent of the vehicle population, were involved in 23.4 percent of collisions.


These studies underscore the critical role of visibility in accident occurrence. Light colors like white and yellow stand out more, especially in low-light conditions or adverse weather, whereas darker shades tend to blend with the road environment, reducing visibility.


Beyond Color: Other Accident Influencers

While the color of a car is a factor in its visibility, it's not the sole element affecting accident rates. Aspects such as the driver's skills, environmental visibility, weather conditions, and the car's mechanical state also play significant roles in road safety.


Safety Considerations in Car Color Selection

Advised Colors for Enhanced Safety

In light of these findings, choosing a car's color with safety in mind could be a wise decision. Colors that offer better visibility and hence may be safer include:

  • White
  • Silver
  • Yellow


Guidance for Car Buyers

Dominic Wyatt from the International Drivers Association suggests that car buyers weigh the color of a vehicle as part of their purchase decision. While it shouldn't be the sole criterion, opting for a more visible color could potentially lower the risk of accidents. This consideration is especially pertinent for individuals who place a high emphasis on safety.


Car purchasers should deliberate their color choice, balancing personal taste with safety implications. A preference for darker shades might carry increased accident risks. Therefore, giving car color careful consideration might contribute to a safer driving experience. Sometimes, a safer journey could be as simple as choosing the right color for your car.


This article was co-written using AI and was then heavily edited and optimized by our editorial team.

TTAC Staff
TTAC Staff

More by TTAC Staff

Comments
Join the conversation
 3 comments
  • Peter wyatt Peter wyatt on Feb 23, 2024
    Is this reflected in insurance rates? Always heard red was the most expensive to insure and the highest likelihood of being pulled over by police.
    • 28-Cars-Later 28-Cars-Later on Feb 23, 2024
      I've read the same, but also heard yellow is up there (due to muscle cars and exotics being painted as such).
  • Grg Grg on Feb 24, 2024
    I am not sure that this would hold up in snow country. It used to be that people in snow country would not be caught dead in a white car. Now that white cars have become popular in the north, I can't tell you how many times I have seen white cars driving in the snow without lights. Almost all cars are less visible in a snow storm, or for that matter, rain storm, without lights. White ones become nearly invisible.
  • Lorenzo This car would have sold better if there was a kit to put fiberglass toast slices on the roof.
  • Lorenzo The Malibu is close to what the 1955 Bel Air was, but 6 inches shorter in height, and 3 inches shorter in wheelbase, the former making it much more difficult to get into or out of. Grandma has to sit in front (groan) and she'll still have trouble getting in and out.The '55s had long options lists, but didn't include a 91 cubic inch four with a turbo, or a continuously variable transmission. Metal and decent fabric were replaced by cheap plastic too. The 1955 price was $1765 base, or $20,600 adjusted for inflation, but could be optioned up to $3,000 +/-, or $36,000, so in the same ballpark.The fuel economy, handling, and reliability are improved, but that's about it. Other than the fact that it means one fewer sedan available, there's no reason to be sorry it's being discontinued. Put the 1955 body on it and it'll sell like hotcakes, though.
  • Calrson Fan We are already seeing multiple manufacturers steering away from EVs to Hybrids & PHEVs. Suspect the market will follow. Battery tech isn't anywhere close to where it needs to be for EV's to replace ICE's. Neither is the electrical grid or charging infrastructure. PHEV's still have the drawback that if you can't charge at home your not a potential customer. I've heard stories of people with Volts that never charge them but that's a unique kind of stupidity. If you can't or don't want to charge your PHEV then just get a hybrid.
  • AZFelix The last time I missed the Malibu was when one swerved into my lane and I had to brake hard to avoid a collision. 1 out of 5⭐️. Do not recommend.
  • 2ACL I won't miss it; it was decent at launch, but in addition to the bad packaging, GM did little to keep it relevant in the segment. I'd prefer that another domestic automaker doesn't just give up on the mainstream sedan, but unlike some of Ford's swan songs, the Malibu made an indifferent case for why they should live.
Next