Piston Slap: Bad Information, Badder Boxsters
TTAC commentator Detroit-Iron writes:
I am in the process of buying a new car (despite Steven Lang’s admonitions). I would like to get a 2009 after the 2010’s come out, maybe a Legacy or Ralliart. My problem is that there is zero information on the specific month that a given manufacturer is going to release the 10s. I can understand the manufacturers and dealers wanting to keep that info under wraps considering the inventory but I would think that a journalist or consumer advocate would have it, but I can’t find anything.
One more item: did TTAC ever get a figure for the percentage of Boxsters that had their engines die? Were any years better or worse than others? I came very close to buying one until I found out about that.
Sajeev answers:
I have friends in the car business (who aren’t car people, per se) and I am amazed at their isolation from the operational activities of their respective manufacturers. While The Best and Brightest might disagree, dealer communication channels seem inferior to the rich tapestry of corporate information that “we” get on the automotive blogosphere. Aside from the release date of 2010 models, of course.
Speaking of friends, I grabbed a Porsche Tech from a local dealer for your second question. That’s mostly because I didn’t find conclusive information on Boxster engine problems from Google and Forum searching. It seems like Porsche owners prefer to not air their dirty laundry, unlike damn near any other brand loyalist.
So here’s the scoop, in plain English: the first three years (1997-1999) had cylinder sleeve problems that lead to engine failure. The inventory of Epic Fail engine blocks ran out after 1999. Which is exactly what Wikipedia says on the matter. After that, the only problem (I found) was a leaky rear main seal: Porsche made a redesigned seal, and said Porsche Tech says it’s a good fix.
Of course, my answer is to buy an original Boxster with a blown motor for cheap. Then do a RUF-style big-bore Boxer upgrade from a wrecked 997.
No wait, that’s not ME talking: I suggest spending less (in parts) and get a complete LS4 from a (transverse engine’d) Impala SS, a custom bellhousing adapter from one of many fabricators on the Internet, and re-wire the hell outta that little Porker for unbelievable amounts of mid-corner torque. Now that’s a spicy meatball!
[Send your technical queries to mehta@ttac.com]
More by Sajeev Mehta
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Tassos I’d rather own two low-value homes in low cost areas. And two of the same low-value cars at both homes. The rest of my worth would be used to buy up DJT stock. I’m a serious person.
- Redapple2 Subaru Forester is the only small SUV to earn a good rating in the updated test.As I have said 10 times. Class best resale, safety, quality, features, outward visibility, All wheel drive system, and a 9 square foot sunroof -hate all you want. clearly the best. Two others, the Honda CR-V and Toyota RAV4, are rated acceptable. The Ford Escape, Hyundai Tucson and Jeep Compass earn marginal ratings, while the Chevrolet Equinox, Mazda CX-5, Mitsubishi Outlander and Volkswagen Taos are all rated poor and poor, deadly, unacceptable. Add in low mount low light producing headlamps and......... kill away.
- Kwik_Shift_Pro4X I prefer the "Classic" look along with getting a reg cab, RWD with 8ft bed and 5.7 V8.
- Redapple2 I like the classic ram. Kinda like vinyl vs CD. Low cost. Low frills. Low bs. Simple controls.
- MKizzy A price bump? Give it a couple of bad months + an unpredictable Musk mood swing and the M3 Performance could be selling at Altima prices.
Comments
Join the conversation
Thanks everyone. I think I am going to wait a couple years and see how the next gen engine turns out.