Tesla to Begin Charging Subsription for Connectivity Services

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky


Not to be outdone by the likes of BMW and Volkswagen Group, Tesla has decided to begin linking its connected services to a subscription-based payment plan. German automakers may be careening headlong into an era where you have to pay a monthly fee just to activate already installed hardware like heated seats. Though Tesla remains the master at conning customers into overpaying for nebulous features and we need only look at the Full-Self Driving suite, that has yet to manifest into genuine vehicular autonomy and just keeps getting more expensive, for an example.


While the standard connectivity package has always been free for the vehicle's lifespan, Big T is now saying that's only going to be true for the first eight years of ownership. The rationale here is that automotive companies have to continue supporting connectivity services and that there needs to be something to help offset that ongoing financial investment.


Considering just how many automakers now offer connectivity as standard equipment these days — often using it as a method for hoovering up customer driving data — seeing Tesla deciding to charge owners after just eight years is slightly disheartening. But the whole industry is pivoting to new payment schemes manufacturers think will yield better margins in the long run and it'll be easier to leverage via all-electric vehicles using over-the-air (OTA) updates. Volkswagen and Mercedes are currently trying to suss out how to charge subscriptions for advanced driving features whereas BMW is already placing hardware-based features behind a digital paywall. However they're just a handful of examples out of an entire industry comprised of manufacturers thinking similarly. In fact, the only large companies I can think of that have indicated some amount of hesitancy toward the notion of having to perpetually support connectivity features on older cars were Toyota and Dodge. But the former seemed mainly concerned about how this would impact long-term reliability, whereas the former just didn't seem to care — something that may change now that it's owned by Stellantis and not Fiat Chrysler Automobiles.


Tesla's cutoff date for a lifetime of free connectivity was July 20th of this year. Customers will now have eight years to enjoy the service (which includes navigation) and then opt into a monthly or annual subscription fee. Pricing hasn't been announced yet but it's likely to be less than the fancier option that comes with things like video streaming, an internet browser, and upgraded traffic info. The premium service is $99 per year at present and appears fairly popular, so we're doubting most die-hard Tesla shoppers will be all that outraged.


Though something about the brand's history leaves one dubious on the prospect of the company adhering to the full eight years. More than likely, we'll see that goalpost moved a little closer sooner than expected. It also needs to be said that Tesla vehicles don't support Apple CarPlay or Android Auto, making the enhanced connectivity a little more important for drivers who are accustomed to a feature-rich infotainment system. Though the group that's going to be affected most are those shopping on the secondhand market, something Tesla has already been a little goofy about.


We've been worried about subscription services run amok for ages. Granted, manufacturers have said these items won't manifest fully for years to come. But most are also saying that with dollar signs in their eyes. Unless the market shows its unwilling to play along, there may soon be a day where drivers have to shell out monthly payments on items that used to be standard equipment or live with the knowledge that it's embedded within the vehicle and they're simply too poor to afford it.


[Image: BoJack/Shutterstock]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 18 comments
  • DenverMike DenverMike on Jul 26, 2022

    Just on principle, not happening. Not just that the aftermarket can it do better, if I can't live without, but not before simply trying a hot-wire. Every gadget is 12volts at its core, like heated seats for example.


    Except I'd rather opt out in the showroom to begin with. I'm all about the "base model" or one notch or package up, depending features. Some are clearly at the automaker's loss, if you can handle it, staring at blockoff plates and whatnot.




  • Kendahl Kendahl on Aug 08, 2022

    A Tesla feature has been free, periodic, over-the-air, software updates that add new features or improve existing ones. Owners brag that their x-year-old car is better today, because of the updates, than it was brand new. Will Tesla start charging for these updates after a few years? Teslas hold their value very well. I suspect losing free updates will do serious damage to that.

  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
  • SPPPP I am actually a pretty big Alfa fan ... and that is why I hate this car.
  • SCE to AUX They're spending billions on this venture, so I hope so.Investing during a lull in the EV market seems like a smart move - "buy low, sell high" and all that.Key for Honda will be achieving high efficiency in its EVs, something not everybody can do.
Next